Taking bets on the legal outcome of the ICE shooting
| useless shrine | 01/10/26 | | Mischievous appetizing abode digit ratio | 01/10/26 | | useless shrine | 01/10/26 | | Arousing dopamine theater stage | 01/10/26 | | useless shrine | 01/10/26 | | Arousing dopamine theater stage | 01/10/26 | | Arousing dopamine theater stage | 01/10/26 | | useless shrine | 01/10/26 | | Arousing dopamine theater stage | 01/10/26 | | useless shrine | 01/10/26 | | Arousing dopamine theater stage | 01/10/26 | | useless shrine | 01/10/26 | | Stimulating Office Becky | 01/11/26 | | Chest-beating flickering pisswyrm giraffe | 01/10/26 | | useless shrine | 01/10/26 | | Motley emerald degenerate mad cow disease | 01/10/26 | | Maniacal Bistre Private Investor | 01/10/26 | | olive concupiscible personal credit line | 01/10/26 | | useless shrine | 01/10/26 | | Cerise Dead Parlour | 01/10/26 | | useless shrine | 01/10/26 | | Stimulating Office Becky | 01/11/26 | | Stimulating Office Becky | 01/11/26 | | Lavender dilemma | 01/10/26 | | supple rusted field persian | 01/10/26 | | diverse misunderstood stead cumskin | 01/11/26 | | Stimulating Office Becky | 01/11/26 | | cerebral newt sweet tailpipe | 01/11/26 | | fragrant translucent center cuckoldry | 01/10/26 | | disturbing flirting jew | 01/10/26 | | flushed address | 01/10/26 | | useless shrine | 01/10/26 | | beta disgusting weed whacker | 01/11/26 | | Stimulating Office Becky | 01/11/26 | | Curious Peach Rehab Doctorate | 01/10/26 | | supple rusted field persian | 01/10/26 | | Stimulating Office Becky | 01/11/26 | | cerebral newt sweet tailpipe | 01/11/26 | | useless shrine | 01/11/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: January 10th, 2026 5:20 PM Author: useless shrine
- Ross receives executive clemency (non-prosecution or preemptive pardon). State will wait to prosecute until a lib President comes around. If Ross receives a preemptive pardon, the federal government will let Ross be prosecuted by the state. If the case is removed to federal court, the court will find that he doesn't meet the Neagle standard and deny dismissal (of course the Department of Justice will file a brief in support of the prosecution). He is convicted of murder (imperfect self defense is not a defense under Minnesota law). If no pardon, lib administration prosecutes and gets a little time for deprivation under color of law.
- Good's wife sues Ross under Bivens, possibly the FTCA. Court finds there was reasonable suspicion for detention but (1) no reasonable fear given that he saw her turning away from him, and/or (2) excessive force given officer-created jeopardy (going in front of her car). Probably 1 is more likely because the lib judge will appeal-proof it by making it as dependent on factual findings as possible.
- Car owners hit by Good's car sue Good's estate for negligence and the United States under the FTCA. They settle with Good's estate for PD limit and with the United States for the remainder.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5820483&forum_id=2Elisa#49579315) |
 |
Date: January 10th, 2026 6:11 PM Author: Arousing dopamine theater stage
so it's like a mini trial on the merits? and behaving outside policy strips you of the right to remove?
i thought the "scope" turns on whether you're doing the role that your federal office envisions. so a cop doing arrests or stops or whatever is in the "scope" even if they broke some policy.
(i have no idea what i'm talking about, btw.)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5820483&forum_id=2Elisa#49579469) |
 |
Date: January 10th, 2026 6:19 PM Author: useless shrine
You know what, the standard for removal is different then the standard for immunity, and I didn't know enough about it until today. I'm poasting far too carelessly and I apologize.
The standard for immunity is whether he's acting reasonably within the scope of his authority IIRC. Here I think his failure to abide most likely fucks up the 'reasonably' part. If ICE policy was 'kill anyone who drives in your direction' or 'kill all woman drivers' probably he would prevail.
The standard for remand is whether there's a plausible federal defense. Definitely he has a plausible federal defense, so he won't get remanded. Correcting myself again now.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5820483&forum_id=2Elisa#49579502) |
Date: January 10th, 2026 5:22 PM Author: Chest-beating flickering pisswyrm giraffe
“simply refusing to remove the case to federal court”
doesn’t that right belong to the defendant?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5820483&forum_id=2Elisa#49579321) |
Date: January 10th, 2026 6:33 PM Author: Lavender dilemma
The shitlib infestation of xo is unacceptable. Both dykes attempted to murder one or more federal agents.
Maybe some pussy hat wearing MN judge will try some bullshit but unless USA is in full shitlib banana republic mode by then, ICE is just going to tell them to eat shit and Ross won’t even appear.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5820483&forum_id=2Elisa#49579530) |
|
|