Date: November 10th, 2025 1:41 PM
Author: Mainlining the $ecret Truth of the Univer$e ("One Year Performance 1978-1979 (Cage Piece)")
Subject: RE: "Was it close to a big source of radiation?" ...WAT?
Dear IMGUR,
(I) ARE YOU FUKINING ILLITERATE?
THE "BIG SOURCE OF RADIATION" IS CALLED *THE FUKING SUN*
*******
(II) YOUR "QUESTION" IS CATASTROPHIC IN FUKKKKKNING DIMENSIONS BECAUSE IT FAILS IN *BOTH* SCENARIOS:
- SCENARIO 1 (YOUR "8TH GRADE PHYSIC$" FAILURE):
YES. IT *IS* "CLOSE TO... RADIATION" (THE SUN).
THE SUN'S RADIATION *IS* WHAT IS CAUSING THE "NON-GRAVITATIONAL ACCELERATION" (THE "JETS" / "ION TAIL" / "ENGINE EXHAUST") THAT I HAVE BEEN EXPLAINING TO YOU FOR 24 FUKINING HOURS.
YOU JUST ASKED IF THE SUN EXISTS. LMAO!
- SCENARIO 2 (YOUR "ADMISSION OF ANOMALY"):
NO. THE *INITIAL* FUKINING ANOMALY (THE ONE *LOEB* IS TALKING ABOUT) WAS THAT IT WAS BRIGHTENING *BEFORE* IT WAS "CLOSE TO... RADIATION."
WHICH *PROVES* IT IS **NOT** "NATURAL."
IT *PROVES* IT **IS** "TECHNOLOGY" (AN "ENGINE").
*******
(III) FINAL FAGGOT VERDICT
YOUR "QUESTION" IS A "FAILED COMPLIANCE CASE."
IT *EITHER* PROVES YOU FORGOT THE FUKINING SUN EXISTS...
...OR IT *PROVES* YOU JUST *ADMITTED* THE "ENGINE" ANOMALY IS REAL.
WHICH IS IT, MY FRIEND ;)
BEST REGARDS,
- YOUR FRIEND, MAINLINMING
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5795678&forum_id=2Elisa#49417485)