The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Rolling Stones at their nadir: Charlie Watts is all business
| fishy menage | 11/04/25 |
| vivacious prole mediation | 11/04/25 |
| disgusting box office weed whacker | 11/04/25 |
| curious effete spot sound barrier | 11/04/25 |
| Painfully honest umber house | 11/04/25 |
| Vermilion stag film brethren | 11/04/25 |
| Painfully honest umber house | 11/04/25 |
| disgusting box office weed whacker | 11/04/25 |
| fishy menage | 11/04/25 |
| Vermilion stag film brethren | 11/05/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 4th, 2025 2:41 AM Author: fishy menage This song got forgotten but Charlie is having a blast here
https://youtu.be/3RGhtDjup38?si=Hj7j3MGb-AWm7HX6 |
Date: November 4th, 2025 7:15 AM Author: vivacious prole mediation (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5793255&forum_id=2Elisa#49400257) |
|
Date: November 4th, 2025 7:22 AM Author: disgusting box office weed whacker This is one of my favorite stones songs. They have so many great deep cuts. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5793255&forum_id=2Elisa#49400278) |
|
Date: November 4th, 2025 7:32 AM Author: curious effete spot sound barrier Heard "She's So Cold" the other day and I was struck by how much magic they had.
The entire song isn't even really built on a riff. Its just a kind of half-riff. And the lyric has the same halfway-worked-out quality. Just one idea, really. "Im burning up and she's frigid", repeated 57 times.
And it's not in their pantheon of famous songs, but it just hits so perfectly and is better than what almost anyone else would put out.
I do, in fact, have to hand it to boomers in this regard. |
 |
Date: November 4th, 2025 8:18 AM Author: Painfully honest umber house The Rolling Stones are English. Foreigners don’t have Gens.
American Boomer music is all that tired tripe you hear on your local Scumbag classic rock station. |
|
Date: November 4th, 2025 8:21 AM Author: Vermilion stag film brethren you're so fucking retarded it's unreal (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5793255&forum_id=2Elisa#49400394) |
|
Date: November 4th, 2025 8:22 AM Author: Painfully honest umber house It’s just the facts Jack, you suck btw (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5793255&forum_id=2Elisa#49400395) |
|
Date: November 4th, 2025 8:33 AM Author: disgusting box office weed whacker the stones are my favorite band ever, hands down and nobody comes close imo. this is a big part of that. they were so perfect together, and if you look at the solo stuff they did, it's nothing in comparison.
they harnessed magic from about 1965 until 1982. then they started sucking. |
|
Date: November 4th, 2025 4:25 PM Author: fishy menage Just like the Beatles, they needed a drummer who was a cut above the other musicians in the band in terms of raw talent. Both Ringo and Charlie Watts were established figures in their own right by the the time they became affiliated with these rock and roll bands. The Rolling Stones needed that dood to keep time, for one thing.
The Who had a drummer who couldn't keep time, so they used keyboards and shit for songs like Join Together where drums would normally keep time. The drummer was driving the band, but he wasn't "in the pocket" like Charlie Watts, and the band didn't have 1/50th as many hit singles. |
|
Date: November 5th, 2025 9:21 AM Author: Vermilion stag film brethren Paul McCartney was far and away the best pure musician in the Beatles.
paraphrasing famous John Lennon remark:
Interviewer: "John, is Ringo the best drummer in the world in your view?"
John Lennon: "Ringo's not even the best drummer in The Beatles." |