The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Not a lawyer but why "turn over" incriminating shit during "discovery"?
| hot kitchen double fault | 07/02/25 |
| canary boyish lettuce | 07/02/25 |
| hot kitchen double fault | 07/02/25 |
| flirting soul-stirring church building gaping | 07/02/25 |
| Pearl nighttime legend | 07/02/25 |
| Honey-headed son of senegal step-uncle's house | 07/02/25 |
| Diverse Jew | 07/02/25 |
| avocado candlestick maker | 07/02/25 |
| canary boyish lettuce | 07/02/25 |
| Zombie-like Pit Striped Hyena | 07/02/25 |
| transparent bawdyhouse pistol | 07/02/25 |
| insane dark alpha | 07/02/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 2nd, 2025 5:08 PM Author: hot kitchen double fault The other side doesn't have it and doesn't know it exists, just don't give them the incriminating shit lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2Elisa#49066970) |
Date: July 2nd, 2025 5:10 PM Author: canary boyish lettuce any big enough law firm is going to require that it have access to the clients files and will run search terms, etc. no point in an attorney refusing to turn it over even if the client doesn't want to. and theres going to be some degree of discovery on discovery/preservation efforts made. on a smaller level im sure it happens all the time. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2Elisa#49066974) |
 |
Date: July 2nd, 2025 5:14 PM Author: hot kitchen double fault Ok hide it and then if the opposition somehow finds it you can play dumb and in that case ur furked anyway so game theory says ur best bet is to not voluntarily hand it over (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2Elisa#49066988) |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2025 5:10 PM Author: flirting soul-stirring church building gaping ome weird trick (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2Elisa#49066975) |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2025 5:26 PM Author: Pearl nighttime legend winning isn't winning if it costs you your law license edit. i might have to rethink this |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2025 5:42 PM Author: Honey-headed son of senegal step-uncle's house lol at it ever costing you your law license. Worst case is maybe getting your complaint/answer struck but that would be after multiple orders. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2Elisa#49067042) |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2025 5:43 PM Author: Diverse Jew Enjoy hell. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2Elisa#49067043) |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2025 5:55 PM Author: avocado candlestick maker This is why associates have a "bad docs" tag -- those are collected and sent to the partners so they can brainstorm reasons not to produce them, while the other 2 million pages of trash get produced.
The associates can later say they tagged it for further review and the partners can say "I thought this already got produced" if it ever surfaces through a third party or whatever. |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2025 7:04 PM Author: canary boyish lettuce "hot docs" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2Elisa#49067246) |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2025 7:05 PM Author: Zombie-like Pit Striped Hyena "i don't think this document is even responsive!" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2Elisa#49067249) |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2025 7:23 PM Author: transparent bawdyhouse pistol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2Elisa#49067291) |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2025 7:35 PM Author: insane dark alpha Technically, it's not incriminating if it's not produced. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2Elisa#49067318) |