hmmm…

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5673416&forum_id=2Elisa#48609352)

thats why consuela never copy and pastes the contents into xo like everyone else

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5673416&forum_id=2Elisa#48609375)

you're retarded

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5673416&forum_id=2Elisa#48609381)

he needs to dump her and get with someone who won't ultimately reject him for being a loser (which she will, because compared to her he is)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5673416&forum_id=2Elisa#48609896)

I care.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5673416&forum_id=2Elisa#48609857)

people like this guy bemoan this paradigm now. they'll be singing a different tune very, very soon

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5673416&forum_id=2Elisa#48609901)

and we already live in a UBI society btw. like 15% of adults have real jobs where they actually create value doing productive tasks. if anything, AI is going to lead to *less* UBI, not more

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5673416&forum_id=2Elisa#48609930)

if you're working for a living, you're either going to be working directly with AI, or you're going to be doing manual labor. there will also continue to be people who own and get returns on capital, and people who get their expenses paid for by the government (public "employees", NGOs, welfare recipients, etc)

all of the "middle ground" jobs are going away. and it's a good thing, actually. they warp society in a negative way and nobody actually enjoys doing them

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5673416&forum_id=2Elisa#48609957)

there actually is no plan other than "allow AI to create so many redundancies that a large swathe of the population is reduced to serfdom"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5673416&forum_id=2Elisa#48609944)

there's no moral or practical "value" to having to have humans fill out excel sheets or send emails. in fact there is negative value in humans having to do these things, just like there was negative value in having to have humans plow fields before better technology was invented that can plow fields for us

and humans are already "serfs" in the sense that we can't provide for ourselves, like wild animals can, without our social systems and division of labor and technology. but there's nothing wrong with that. that's part of being human. it's an unambiguously good thing. being a subsistence slave of nature like a fucking animal is bad, actually. technology is based and awesome and leveraging it to improve our own existence beyond that of lower animals is what has allowed us to become the most advanced life in the known universe

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5673416&forum_id=2Elisa#48609971)

1. He’s an ignominious pink collar house slave. the “job” is probably designed so a Woman can do it even if she has to pick up kids from Practice at random times. If he had self awareness he’d just be like “Im a Loser. Discuss.” He’s probably surrounded by Women and maybe URMs.

2. His comp is unposted. A lot of Losers think blue collar workers all make like $12/hr when a ton make more than Losers, 6 figures isn’t really anything with overtime.

3. The comp of some sinecures is inflated because you’re doing a Thing that the bossprick would have to do if you weren’t there. Because the bosspricks have a high opinion of themselves and need to keep up appearances, the comp is downstream of that. The Fake Job only really exists because of dumb management and the Caste System mindset.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5673416&forum_id=2Elisa#48612048)