John Locke also struggled to understand why we allow inheritance
| effete dilemma | 06/10/25 | | Concupiscible cocky stage | 06/10/25 | | effete dilemma | 06/10/25 | | Indecent tan hell factory reset button | 06/10/25 | | effete dilemma | 06/10/25 | | Indecent tan hell factory reset button | 06/10/25 | | effete dilemma | 06/10/25 | | Indecent tan hell factory reset button | 06/10/25 | | effete dilemma | 06/10/25 | | Indecent tan hell factory reset button | 06/10/25 | | effete dilemma | 06/10/25 | | coral glittery internal respiration | 06/10/25 | | effete dilemma | 06/10/25 | | coral glittery internal respiration | 06/10/25 | | coral glittery internal respiration | 06/10/25 | | effete dilemma | 06/10/25 | | coral glittery internal respiration | 06/10/25 | | effete dilemma | 06/10/25 | | coral glittery internal respiration | 06/10/25 | | effete dilemma | 06/10/25 | | coral glittery internal respiration | 06/10/25 | | effete dilemma | 06/10/25 | | coral glittery internal respiration | 06/10/25 | | effete dilemma | 06/10/25 | | frum arousing rehab degenerate | 06/10/25 | | effete dilemma | 06/10/25 | | sickened poppy stain | 06/10/25 | | effete dilemma | 06/10/25 | | Disturbing adventurous hall | 06/10/25 | | henna mother | 06/10/25 | | obsidian sinister meetinghouse doctorate | 06/10/25 | | Burgundy Violent Prole Liquid Oxygen | 06/10/25 | | effete dilemma | 06/10/25 | | Burgundy Violent Prole Liquid Oxygen | 06/10/25 | | effete dilemma | 06/10/25 | | coral glittery internal respiration | 06/10/25 | | Bateful feces garrison | 06/10/25 | | effete dilemma | 06/10/25 | | Bateful feces garrison | 06/10/25 | | coral glittery internal respiration | 06/10/25 | | Bateful feces garrison | 06/10/25 | | effete dilemma | 06/10/25 | | jet-lagged spot pervert | 06/10/25 | | effete dilemma | 06/10/25 | | jet-lagged spot pervert | 06/10/25 | | effete dilemma | 06/10/25 | | jet-lagged spot pervert | 06/10/25 | | effete dilemma | 06/11/25 | | razzle-dazzle piazza legend | 06/10/25 | | balding chapel | 06/10/25 | | arrogant bronze stag film | 06/10/25 | | effete dilemma | 06/10/25 | | walnut area | 06/10/25 | | arrogant bronze stag film | 06/10/25 | | effete dilemma | 06/10/25 | | abnormal box office | 06/10/25 | | effete dilemma | 06/10/25 | | garnet mad cow disease | 06/10/25 | | effete dilemma | 06/10/25 | | garnet mad cow disease | 06/10/25 | | effete dilemma | 06/10/25 | | garnet mad cow disease | 06/10/25 | | effete dilemma | 06/10/25 | | garnet mad cow disease | 06/10/25 | | effete dilemma | 06/10/25 | | garnet mad cow disease | 06/10/25 | | effete dilemma | 06/10/25 | | garnet mad cow disease | 06/10/25 | | effete dilemma | 06/10/25 | | obsidian sinister meetinghouse doctorate | 06/11/25 | | effete dilemma | 06/11/25 | | cordovan trip goyim | 06/10/25 | | garnet mad cow disease | 06/10/25 | | effete dilemma | 06/10/25 | | opaque territorial antidepressant drug nursing home | 06/10/25 | | arrogant bronze stag film | 06/10/25 | | effete dilemma | 06/10/25 | | arrogant bronze stag film | 06/10/25 | | effete dilemma | 06/10/25 | | deep space jew | 06/11/25 | | effete dilemma | 06/11/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: June 10th, 2025 3:27 PM Author: Indecent tan hell factory reset button
Yeah, that's what organically developed rules and traditions look like. But there has been constant debate over the details and what it should look like.
I recall the first several paragraphs of the Magna Carta are about inheritance, eg. how long you have to wait before kicking a widow out of her dead husband's house.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5735676&forum_id=2Elisa#49002721)
|
 |
Date: June 10th, 2025 2:34 PM Author: coral glittery internal respiration
you're remarkably stupid.
because the natural state of things is that people pass their shit to their kids or the strongest guy takes what he wants.
a system where everything escheats back to the state and is fairly redistributed is extraordinarily complicated even today which is why communism and socialism and tons of other systems designed to solve weath inequality have failed.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5735676&forum_id=2Elisa#49002652) |
Date: June 10th, 2025 1:51 PM Author: Burgundy Violent Prole Liquid Oxygen
The reasons for this seem pretty functional, partly because the way the king keeps his job is my making powerful people happy and partly simply not killing the golden goose. The drive to provide for your children is so strong that parents will resent a regime that prevents them from doing it, and do everything possible to circumvent it (transfer late in life, have children on the title of their properties, etc.). The wealthy are by definition powerful, so this is a great way to anger people who can start the revolution. BUT, even if you succeed, you've destroyed the incentive for your most productive citizens to produce. Once they have enough money for themselves, they'll just soft quit. It's better to have them toil to make the kingdom wealthier even if you only get some of it, rather than to try to take it all and get nothing. If I wasn't building wealth for my children to have some day, I already would have clocked out of the faggot rat race.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5735676&forum_id=2Elisa#49002545) |
 |
Date: June 10th, 2025 3:02 PM Author: coral glittery internal respiration
CONTROL YOURSELF
TAKE ONLY WHAT YOU NEED DUPA
FAMILIY CANT ALL THAT MUTTON
THAT YOU HUNTED
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5735676&forum_id=2Elisa#49002702) |
Date: June 10th, 2025 4:07 PM Author: effete dilemma
RSF's daddy can't tell his clients to hire RSF and pay him to be their lawyer (lmao). So why does society let RSF inherit money his daddy made from those same clients?
https://i.imgur.com/X8OR992.png
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5735676&forum_id=2Elisa#49002778) |
 |
Date: June 10th, 2025 5:50 PM Author: effete dilemma
If we held a referendum today on how Musk's money should be distributed after he dies, which side would win the popular vote?
1. Give Musk's money to his children
2. Divide up Musk's fortune and cut a check to every individual American
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5735676&forum_id=2Elisa#49003150) |
 |
Date: June 11th, 2025 1:40 PM Author: effete dilemma
Wrong again, faggotass.
"After 1923, inheritance of property apparently became firmly entrenched, and the restrictions on its scope have been progressively reduced with each amendment. Thus protection by law of "the right; of inheritance in personal ownership" was incorporated in the U.S.S.R. 1936 Constitution now in force."
https://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=9311&context=mlr
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5735676&forum_id=2Elisa#49005583) |
 |
Date: June 10th, 2025 7:21 PM Author: effete dilemma
Put it to a nationwide vote right now:
1. Should we keep letting rich people donate their money to their kids after they die, or;
2. Should the government confiscate rich people's wealth after they die, and write annual checks to every American for an equal portion of whatever the IRS confiscated from dead rich people that year?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5735676&forum_id=2Elisa#49003347) |
Date: June 11th, 2025 11:41 AM Author: deep space jew
It’s perspective bias on Locke’s part. It has been “voted” on by people and governments often throughout history via personal or social choice. It fails to persist because the strategy loses against people and/or societies that engage in it.
Societies that don’t allow inter generational resource transfers were outcompeted by those that do. Within societies that allow transfers, family units that don’t engage in inter generational wealth transfers were placed at a competitive disadvantage vs those that do and were outcompeted.
People and families are more than free to not engage in inheritance, and the experiment has been run innumerable times throughout history; it’s just a losing strategy.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5735676&forum_id=2Elisa#49005209) |
|
|