The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Honestly like Fuentes, but he needs to talk about J6 aftermath
Poast new message in this thread
Date: August 5th, 2025 11:00 AM Author: 718-662-5970 Zero chance he wasn’t visited and interviewed when there is video, iirc, of him at Capitol encouraging people to go in.
Well I should rephrase that. Zero chance he wasn’t visited unless he was already some kind of spook before J6.
He should say, “yes I was visited and here’s how it went”, or even “I had to sign a bunch of legal docs that mean I cannot even talk about J6.”
If his default is “I’m on video encouraging it, others have gone to prison for that, but nothing happened to me and I never mention it, but I talk about God knows all else”, viewers’ default must be he’s compromised |
Date: August 5th, 2025 11:03 AM Author: animeboi (.) 'Funny story I heard from a GOP insider friend of mine (worked on Trump campaign for Susie Wiles) is that initially when Fuentes met Trump, the Trump team was open to working with him despite everything b/c they thought he had this huge base of support but when they ran analytics on his audience they found out it was mostly bots boosting him on twitter and that the few who were earnestly engaging were in their early to mid teens. They deemed him useless and cast him aside and he's never forgotten it.'
fuck off groyper. |
 |
Date: August 5th, 2025 11:04 AM Author: ,.,.. sounds legit. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5758553&forum_id=2Elisa#49158187) |
|
Date: August 5th, 2025 11:10 AM Author: ,.,.. the fact that he has never addressed it directly, AFAIK, is damning.
i think there is something there. he avoided prosecution somehow.
but the idea that it is somehow a long-term goal of 'the feds' to mainstream antisemitism/white nationalism (that is what he is doing; he is not a 'Klansman' grotesque, like previous fed ops), is ludicrous. |
|
Date: August 6th, 2025 9:55 AM Author: 718-662-5970 i really have little idea of what it means to be a domestic right winger "asset" of intelligence agencies.
i suppose reading up on how they penetrated left wing groups (civil rights, black panthers, yippies, etc) in the 50s-70s might give better indication of their protocols. It may just be something like "we will circle back regularly to take your temperature", it might be "get persons X, Y, Z on the phone and get them talking while we record", it might be as extreme as "your talking points are detailed in this memo". It certainly involves greasing the skids of their career within their left wing / right wing audience.
An example in plain sight is Richard Spencer. Its public record that in the wake of Charlottesville he endured multiple days of 8+ hours "depositions", interviews and such. And he never faced criminal charges. And then he emerged, after a silence, as a reliable critic of MAGA and WNism.
You can tell the Richard Spencer story one way -- he was always an edgelord, always cultivated ironic distance, and after 2016 he just moved to safer and easier terrain from which to be edgy, countersignalling the right. You could explain it that he simply had his balls blown off by a seriously traumatic series of events and realized he no longer wants to play with dynamite.
Or you could tell it such that he is clearly being instructed to divert dissidents away from MAGA.
I have no fucking idea.
But at least he was honest, afaik, about how he was put in the Star Chamber after The Event.
Fuentes doesnt even mention it. Nor, interestingly, do his biggest enemies (BAP, Candace Owens, now Tucker). The biggest, easiest shot to take at him, and no one is taking it.
Hard not to conclude they are all playing in the same sandbox, putting on a "show" about speaking truth to power, but really just obeying all the rules |
|
Date: August 6th, 2025 10:21 AM Author: gram parsons it is perplexing. the more you look into the fed infiltrations of radical politics in the 20th c, the more you are prepared to entertain even the wildest, most outlandish claims about their tactics today. the documented trickery of the FBI/CIA is almost beyond belief.
but what are we being asked to believe about Fuentes? he was saying mostly the same things, as a teenager, 10 years ago; he (or someone else) would likely be saying the same things today. his 'operative' status offers little explanatory power about his behavior. he was also deplatformed for 5 years, with a limited audience. so no one seems to be 'boosting his signal.'
do these theories even make sense? if Spencer's job was to become David Duke 2.0, a scary KKK Bogeyman the feds could wield to tar right-wingers/Trump by association, how does his denunciation of Trump and embracing of Biden/Harris fit into this? I guess there is an argument that he switched to a strategy of imploding/demoralizing the Alt Right, but it seems illogical. why not keep him in Bogeyman mode?
i think at a certain level of notoriety in radical politics, the Feds just start showing up and making informal contact with people as a matter of course. they don't 'run' them as dedicated agents, but there is some kind of line of communication. that is what I get from reading about the 20th c. |
|
Date: August 6th, 2025 10:28 AM Author: 718-662-5970 whatever the fed goals, if any, with people like spencer and fuentes, 99% of them are probably behind the scenes.
introduce our guy to your friends
use this phone device or this laptop that we give you
let us watch every donation you get
etc etc. Stuff that might only result in very clandestine and small-fries stuff (e.g. detaining some guy way down the chain making bombs which will never make the news)
But some of it just might be push a very close election 0.0001% left or right. Spencer pushed for Kamala very hard. Fuentes pushed against Joe Kent very hard, and I think tried to push Kamala in Michigan.
Negligible results, nationally. But you never know.
Thats my best guess. |
|
Date: August 6th, 2025 10:33 AM Author: gram parsons that's what I meant in my last paragraph. I think the Feds' main interest/contact with these people is telling them 'here's our card. if someone is talking about shooting up a shopping mall, call us.'
that is more their interest. Feds keeping Fuentes out of jail to act as a 'known quantity' in far right politcs, which is preferable to the unknown alternative, would explain how he avoided trouble after J6.
no need to assume anything beyond that. |
|
Date: August 6th, 2025 10:55 AM Author: 718-662-5970 based on nothing but knowledge of human nature, I suspect it runs deeper.
premises: the agents in DC offices fucking hate this kid. Despise him. they rose out of prosecutorial / law enforcement backgrounds and literally understand themselves as "putting bad guys in jail". hammers see the whole world as nails, etc.
further premises: they have him dead to rights, others similarly situated are getting assraped in fed pen, he has zero leverage.
conclusion: they are going to get a lot more juice out of him than merely, "call us on your own initiative if you can help, no worries if you don't haha."
my purview is 100 miles lower, with drug dealers and such. these criminal defendants have to walk into rooms where people are armed and pointing guns and introduce their new cop "friends", and then later take public witness stands and testify, etc., and do this kind of work for years just to avoid a cocaine sales charge. Id be surprised if "sedition" level targets don't have to bend completely backwards and sing opera while standing on their head |
|
Date: August 6th, 2025 11:08 AM Author: gram parsons so what is the narrative?
the 'feds' own Nick Fuentes --> literally nothing about his behavior/show changes in 10 years as a result of this --> the feds' agenda is ultimately to maneuver Fuentes into destroying the reputation of Tucker Carlson (a CIA agent) who platforms JD Vance & other fed/ZOG friendlies?
it makes no sense.
i guess he could be giving them information, sure. but about what? he is not part of a militia. he does a podcast.
all the J6 people are free/pardoned now anyway. it was political theater, not real 'sedition'. there is no juice left in J6 with which to credibly threaten people. |
|
Date: August 5th, 2025 11:12 AM Author: cock of michael obama There's no chance he wasn't prosecuted for his role in J6 while all his followers were (after he publicly told them to destroy their phones and evidence) without him being at least a federal asset. Zero.
His funds, seized by the feds, were also quietly returned to him.
He's a homosexual and possible pedophile who shows massive disdain for his audience. Great public speaker though. |
|
Date: August 6th, 2025 10:03 AM Author: 718-662-5970 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-J6-TRANSCRIPT-CTRL0000050583/pdf/GPO-J6-TRANSCRIPT-CTRL0000050583.pdf
lmao how have i never seen this |
|
Date: August 6th, 2025 10:06 AM Author: 718-662-5970 His lawyer starts to chimp and he starts with fifth amendment answers when the questioning immediately turns to his sources of income and whether he has received govt funds (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5758553&forum_id=2Elisa#49161321) |
|
Date: August 6th, 2025 10:14 AM Author: megapoaster summer repeatedly asking your deposition witness if he's livestreaming the interview as he repeatedly takes the 5th amendment tp (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5758553&forum_id=2Elisa#49161344) |
|
Date: August 6th, 2025 10:17 AM Author: 718-662-5970 Q: Do you believe in the superiority of the white race, tp?
A: Fifth Amendment, tp |
|
Date: August 6th, 2025 10:32 AM Author: megapoaster summer they literally asked him that exact question btw (he took the 5th in response) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5758553&forum_id=2Elisa#49161404) |
|
Date: August 6th, 2025 10:33 AM Author: cannon (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5758553&forum_id=2Elisa#49161411) |
|
Date: August 6th, 2025 10:16 AM Author: megapoaster summer Q Hearing none, Mr. Fuentes, are you familiar with the protests against COVID 5 lockdown measures in spring 2020? 6 A Fifth Amendment. 7 Q Mr. Fuentes, I'm just asking if you're familiar with the fact that those 8 happened. 9 A Fifth Amendment actually.
lmfao |
|
Date: August 6th, 2025 10:17 AM Author: megapoaster summer one weird trick, just respond "5th amendment" to every single question you're asked (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5758553&forum_id=2Elisa#49161354) |
|
Date: August 6th, 2025 10:19 AM Author: megapoaster summer Q Fifth Amendment. Do you feel responsible? Fifth Amendment. Mr. Fuentes, also on the same day - 9 exhibit 14, please? could you bring up 10 Mr. Fuentes, on January 7th, 2021, you tweeted, quote, "The Capitol siege was 11 fucking awesome and I'm not going to pretend it wasn't," end quote. 12 What was awesome about the Capitol siege? 13 14 15 16 17 A Fifth Amendment. Q Was anyone asking you to pretend it wasn't? A Fifth Amendment. Q We can take the exhibit down. Thank you. |
|
Date: August 6th, 2025 10:21 AM Author: megapoaster summer Mr. Fuentes, I just had a few questions for you, and I'm guessing, based on your 14 answers we've had so far, this will go pretty quickly, so just bear with me. 15 B 16 17 States? 18 19 20 21 Q The first one is, who is currently the duly elected President of the United A Fifth Amendment. Q Do you believe women should have the right to vote? A Fifth Amendment. |
|
Date: August 6th, 2025 10:25 AM Author: WNBA dildo ((zurich is stained)) this doesn't say much, though. the dood just pled the 5th to every single question. so what? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5758553&forum_id=2Elisa#49161385) |
|
Date: August 6th, 2025 10:27 AM Author: gram parsons it means we all must support 'colorblind meritocracy' and Curtis Yarvinism now (Tucker) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5758553&forum_id=2Elisa#49161392) |