using only SAT for college acceptance means fewer elites and more poors (link)
| Hyperventilating soul-stirring set | 12/29/25 | | Alcoholic Site | 12/29/25 | | Hyperventilating soul-stirring set | 12/29/25 | | Alcoholic Site | 12/29/25 | | black filthy lodge | 12/29/25 | | Alcoholic Site | 12/29/25 | | black filthy lodge | 12/29/25 | | Alcoholic Site | 12/29/25 | | balding partner | 12/29/25 | | Contagious senate | 12/29/25 | | Hyperventilating soul-stirring set | 12/29/25 | | abusive beta degenerate doctorate | 12/29/25 | | Bronze macaca | 12/29/25 | | Alcoholic Site | 12/29/25 | | abusive beta degenerate doctorate | 12/29/25 | | Hyperventilating soul-stirring set | 12/29/25 | | bat-shit-crazy aromatic gas station | 12/29/25 | | Aquamarine brunch | 12/29/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: December 29th, 2025 11:01 AM Author: Hyperventilating soul-stirring set
you’d think libs would support this..
https://x.com/garrytan/status/1958963104462905385
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815083&forum_id=2Reputation#49546953) |
Date: December 29th, 2025 2:41 PM Author: Bronze macaca
Mark Simon
@MarkSimonHK
Actually it's sports that are the best predictor of success in life, not SAT's. Isn't an education about a better life, not just "academic success".
A 2023 National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) study by Paul Gompers and colleagues found that Ivy League varsity athletes earn approximately 3.4% more over their careers than their non-athlete peers, controlling for factors like school, major, graduation year, and first job. Athletes also tend to attain more senior positions. The study suggests that athletic participation builds non-academic human capital (e.g., resilience, teamwork, time management) valued in the labor market.
https://x.com/MarkSimonHK/status/1958972602506256611
damn this is a trvth nvke
sorry gookbots, the white chads win again
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815083&forum_id=2Reputation#49547538) |
Date: December 29th, 2025 9:34 PM Author: Aquamarine brunch
Don't understand how anyone can think that something like teacher recommendations should be a major factor.
It'd be fair if the teachers were like "Pick this kid, not this kid" - but they're all obviously writing hte best recommendation they can for each student.
Seems absolutely insane that students should be admitted based on how well their teacher can advocate for them. You could plausibly say you should give preferential treatment to the kids with "bad" recommendations because they're teachers are stupid.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815083&forum_id=2Reputation#49548697) |
|
|