The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
SUMMON: Consuela
| To be fair | 07/10/25 |
| Brian Uecker of My Posting Career | 07/10/25 |
| To be fair | 07/10/25 |
| Brian Uecker of My Posting Career | 07/10/25 |
| To be fair | 07/10/25 |
| Brian Uecker of My Posting Career | 07/10/25 |
| To be fair | 07/10/25 |
| cock of michael obama | 07/10/25 |
| To be fair | 07/10/25 |
| cock of michael obama | 07/10/25 |
| To be fair | 07/10/25 |
| :;;::;::: | 07/10/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 10th, 2025 10:07 PM Author: To be fair (Semi-Retarded) To be fair,
Brother, can you explain to me why all of these allegedly sophisticated institutional investors are now pouring money into the BTC scam when the COLD HARD REALITY is that this fake and gay "internet money" is trading at a 1000x multiple of where it SHOULD BE absent the incredibly obvious "tether" fraud that has clearly puffed it up?
Haven't these financial professionals done their due diligence and figured out that this whole fake and gay market is really just a house of cards held up by fraud that will come crashing down someday? I mean, you're just some random guy and you easily figured that out like a decade ago from poking around a few publicly available sources on the internet... and most of these big players haven't previously gotten in deep on BTC, so it's not like they're suffering from a sunk cost fallacy and being forced to double down out of necessity... to the contrary, they're making the conscious choice to jump in now and go long on BTC when it's already trading at $100k+ despite the PROVEN FACT that BTC would REALLY only be trading at like $100 without "tether" propping it up...
So what gives?
Do these morons (who just happen to have randomly been entrusted with collectively managing trillions of dollars worth of private global wealth on behalf of a bunch of very rich and powerful people who will happily assfuck them into oblivion if it all goes to shit) even read your Substack at all?! Don't they know they're playing with fire?! |
Date: July 10th, 2025 10:07 PM Author: Brian Uecker of My Posting Career You know TBF is a kike because he seriously engages with this retard (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5748962&forum_id=2Reputation#49091908) |
 |
Date: July 10th, 2025 10:10 PM Author: To be fair (Semi-Retarded) To be fair,
"You can tell that TBF is the REAL kike because he sometimes spends his time mocking Jews online for their shameless bad faith sophistry."
Wow! |
|
Date: July 10th, 2025 10:13 PM Author: Brian Uecker of My Posting Career You don’t think you’re better than this?
What’s next you’re going to spend your whole weekend watching a 20 hour documentary about the federal reserve because he told you to? |
|
Date: July 10th, 2025 10:15 PM Author: To be fair (Semi-Retarded) To be fair,
If Elon Musk isn't "better" than blowing off steam shitpoasting on X, I'm definitely not "better" than mocking (((Consuela))) on AutoAdmit. |
|
Date: July 10th, 2025 10:28 PM Author: Brian Uecker of My Posting Career Retarded response. Fuck you for being a kike. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5748962&forum_id=2Reputation#49091956) |
|
Date: July 10th, 2025 10:32 PM Author: To be fair (Semi-Retarded) To be fair,
Devastating. |
|
Date: July 10th, 2025 10:57 PM Author: cock of michael obama As I've stated repeatedly, including in two long-form posts (March 2025, May 2023), crypto is 100% controlled by the NSA/CIA and they can do whatever they want with it. They can pump it to $1 mil/BTC if they want or crash it to zero (by taking out the Tether scam, a 15 man operation run by known ponzi fraudsters who have never passed an audit and which has $150 billion (unbacked) assets under management and which has daily trading volume greater than the top 10 coins combined - lmao) - it's entirely up to them.
I have not called for it to go to zero once I understood the full horrific picture (which was quite a few years ago now), nor have I called for it to keep pumping. It will go wherever the security states decides for it to go.
So - enjoy your winnings of a fraud asset 100% controlled by malevolent elites, and sorry that your peabrain is unable to understand a non-pro/con dialectical answer. |
|
Date: July 10th, 2025 11:14 PM Author: To be fair (Semi-Retarded) To be fair,
OK so between:
"Yeah, I guess in retrospect, the balance of probabilities suggest that I was probably wrong about that whole 'tether conspiracy' thing."
and
"This horrific situation ackkkkshually goes far deeper and becomes even darker than I initially understand, indeed, once you see the full picture (it took me years to piece this together), you come to the terrible realization that 'BTC' is actually an insidious tool that is fully operated and controlled by the highest levels of the US government, who deploy it for their own nefarious ends while working in conjunction in a lock-step and tightly coordinated fashion with the levers of international finance as well as various other and sundry ne.... [insert another 30,000 words describing 10 different levels of a massive ~20 year evolving global conspiracy involving countless evil actors]"
You're going with the latter?
Goddamn -- I guess anything is preferable to just admitting you were wrong, huh? ;) |
|
Date: July 10th, 2025 11:23 PM Author: cock of michael obama Nothing has changed in my analysis. As I've stated too, if Tether was willing to undergo an extensive and transparent audit by a Big 4 accounting firm and pass it, going back years, then it would cause a reassessment. It's executives have publicly stated that it would undergo such an audit dozens of times going back a decade, but it has always weaseled out of it. It can't and it won't pass such an audit, because it's a partially backed (at most) Ponzi fraud run with criminal money-laundered funds and controlled by the CIA.
The funny thing is that deep down you know this already. |
|
Date: July 10th, 2025 11:26 PM Author: To be fair (Semi-Retarded) To be fair,
"No, actually, I've ALSO been totally consistent on my position here for the entire time we've been debating this. Indeed, I'm both substantively correct AND perfectly consistent... that last part in particular must infuriate you, no?"
Lmao 180 brother, just 180. I believe you guys call this kind of thing "chutzpah," no? |
|
Date: July 10th, 2025 11:24 PM Author: :;;::;::: He’s busy blotting out memories of shriveled tranny dick atm (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5748962&forum_id=2Reputation#49092141) |