Libs: Michael Phelps is a genetic freak, so that man should box women.
| rambunctious stead telephone | 08/03/24 | | White nighttime background story | 08/03/24 | | pink yarmulke | 08/03/24 | | lilac business firm death wish | 08/03/24 | | titillating anal windowlicker | 08/03/24 | | rambunctious stead telephone | 08/03/24 | | Hateful Peach Fortuitous Meteor | 08/03/24 | | Electric well-lubricated orchestra pit stock car | 08/03/24 | | salmon parlor | 08/03/24 | | Electric well-lubricated orchestra pit stock car | 08/03/24 | | pink yarmulke | 08/03/24 | | Electric well-lubricated orchestra pit stock car | 08/03/24 | | pink yarmulke | 08/03/24 | | Electric well-lubricated orchestra pit stock car | 08/03/24 | | pink yarmulke | 08/03/24 | | arousing zombie-like hell trump supporter | 08/03/24 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: August 3rd, 2024 5:11 PM Author: arousing zombie-like hell trump supporter
Their argument is really a self-own if you think about it.
They argue that Phelps body being double jointed, proportioned the way it is, and processing lactic acid, allowed him to out perform his peers. Which is 100% true.
But none of that stuff is against the rules.
Meanwhile, one of the main rules of competing in women's boxing is that you have to be a woman.
The simple fact is the Algerian boxer's genetic advantage is that it makes her less of a woman than her competitors - which is a problem.
A better analogy would be if we separated swimmers by whether or not they were double jointed, and if Michael Phelps passed the standard double jointed test - bt was actually double jointed in a way that could be detected under a new test. Should he then be able to participate in the non-double jointed division?
Perhaps its debatable, but libs are dumbasses for saying this is obvious...
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5569204&forum_id=2Reputation#47925145) |
|
|