Explain the argument Trump’s lawyer is making here
| fragrant associate round eye | 07/20/25 | | stubborn shrine therapy | 07/20/25 | | wonderful house-broken travel guidebook skinny woman | 07/20/25 | | rough-skinned casino | 07/20/25 | | WWMD (what would Malkmus do) | 07/21/25 | | rough-skinned casino | 07/20/25 | | indigo alcoholic point | 07/20/25 | | well-lubricated space | 07/20/25 | | Burgundy whorehouse | 07/20/25 | | rough-skinned casino | 07/20/25 | | Burgundy whorehouse | 07/20/25 | | rough-skinned casino | 07/20/25 | | mint zombie-like roommate lay | 07/20/25 | | rough-skinned casino | 07/20/25 | | fragrant associate round eye | 07/20/25 | | rough-skinned casino | 07/20/25 | | Rusted vibrant sanctuary | 07/20/25 | | Histrionic emerald market | 07/20/25 | | rough-skinned casino | 07/20/25 | | Rusted vibrant sanctuary | 07/20/25 | | fragrant associate round eye | 07/20/25 | | Big keepsake machete hall | 07/20/25 | | fragrant associate round eye | 07/20/25 | | mint zombie-like roommate lay | 07/20/25 | | ultramarine home ladyboy | 07/20/25 | | fragrant associate round eye | 07/20/25 | | rough-skinned casino | 07/20/25 | | OldHLSDude | 07/21/25 | | ,.,.,.,.,.,.,..,:,,:,,.,:::,.,,.,:.,,.:.,:.,:.::,. | 07/21/25 | | OldHLSDude | 07/21/25 | | ,.,.,.,.,.,.,..,:,,:,,.,:::,.,,.,:.,,.:.,:.,:.::,. | 07/21/25 | | Rusted vibrant sanctuary | 07/20/25 | | OldHLSDude | 07/21/25 | | Rusted vibrant sanctuary | 07/20/25 | | ,.,.,.,.,.,.,..,:,,:,,.,:::,.,,.,:.,,.:.,:.,:.::,. | 07/21/25 | | Malicious Pedophile Crew (MPC) | 07/21/25 | | https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK | 07/21/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 20th, 2025 1:00 PM Author: Big keepsake machete hall
This is a dumb Tweet and a dumb thread.
They're trying to show that the libel was spread not just among the WSJ subscribers, but to hundreds of millions of people.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752584&forum_id=2Reputation#49116437) |
 |
Date: July 21st, 2025 11:26 AM
Author: ,.,.,.,.,.,.,..,:,,:,,.,:::,.,,.,:.,,.:.,:.,:.::,.
sit this one out boomer
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752584&forum_id=2Reputation#49118659) |
 |
Date: July 21st, 2025 11:33 AM
Author: ,.,.,.,.,.,.,..,:,,:,,.,:::,.,,.,:.,,.:.,:.,:.::,.
Just take out “explain”
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752584&forum_id=2Reputation#49118674) |
 |
Date: July 21st, 2025 11:24 AM Author: OldHLSDude
My understanding is that in journalism "exclusive" means that you're the only news outlet who has access to the information and the right to publish it. I don't know if they paywalled this or not. I have WSJ and NYT subscriptions, so everything just opens up automatically.
Exclusivity is possibly a piece of the argument establishing actual malice. If no other news sources carried the information it erases the possibility of an "everybody is saying it" defense and any potential reliance the fact checking by other entities. I just skimmed the complaint.
I am forced to admire Trump's pugilistic spirit. I had an alpha dog like that once. He never took shit from any other dog and was a great inspiration.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752584&forum_id=2Reputation#49118653) |
 |
Date: July 21st, 2025 11:30 AM
Author: ,.,.,.,.,.,.,..,:,,:,,.,:::,.,,.,:.,,.:.,:.,:.::,.
It doesn’t matter if it’s authentic (i.e., whether Trump actually wrote it). What matters is that it purports to be from Trump and was included in a binder Maxwell prepared for Epstein which was then seized by the FBI when they executed the search warrant at Epstein’s property. That fact alone makes it newsworthy, and that’s all WSJ ever said it was. They never said “we hereby declare that Donald Trump authored this letter.” We all know he did, but the point is that part doesn’t even have to be true for WSJ to prevail in this lawsuit.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752584&forum_id=2Reputation#49118669) |
|
|