\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

gunnerattt explain how the fuck THIS is constitutional

Trump is Commander in Chief. The Constitution says it. That ...
https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK
  12/01/25
"A spokesperson for Caine declined to comment beyond th...
https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK
  12/01/25
" That means the military can't talk to other branches ...
NSAM's Schizoid Conspiracy Advent Calendar
  12/01/25
It violates the Espionage Act
https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK
  12/01/25
"Trump is Commander in Chief. The Constitution says it....
NSAM's Schizoid Conspiracy Advent Calendar
  12/01/25
Just answer the question
https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK
  12/01/25
i have no idea what you're asserting and it's clear neither ...
NSAM's Schizoid Conspiracy Advent Calendar
  12/01/25
The Espionage Act was enacted pursuant to the presentment cl...
https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK
  12/01/25
The Espionage Act of June 15, 1917 Espionage Section...
https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK
  12/01/25
ITT we can observe that gunnerattt has never heard of the fi...
https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK
  12/01/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: December 1st, 2025 7:09 PM
Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK


Trump is Commander in Chief. The Constitution says it. That means the military can't talk to other branches of government unless they are authorized through their chain of command. But it seems unlikely Trump or Hegseth authorized active duty officers to speak PRIVATELY with members of Congress - the legislative branch - about sensitive executive branch affairs.

https://archive.is/IsBDJ

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804915&forum_id=2Reputation#49475546)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 1st, 2025 7:12 PM
Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK


"A spokesperson for Caine declined to comment beyond the statement issued by his office, saying the general’s communications with Congress are private."

Sounds like a confession to me!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804915&forum_id=2Reputation#49475553)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 1st, 2025 7:17 PM
Author: NSAM's Schizoid Conspiracy Advent Calendar (gunneratttt)

" That means the military can't talk to other branches of government unless they are authorized through their chain of command."

this isn't the law. you're making up law from schizo fantasy, and because your schizo fantasy doesn't align with reality, you think that's QED that reality is wrong.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804915&forum_id=2Reputation#49475573)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 1st, 2025 7:18 PM
Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK


It violates the Espionage Act

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804915&forum_id=2Reputation#49475577)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 1st, 2025 7:20 PM
Author: NSAM's Schizoid Conspiracy Advent Calendar (gunneratttt)

"Trump is Commander in Chief. The Constitution says it. That means the military can't talk to other branches of government unless they are authorized through their chain of command."

1) you're asserting that it's a constitutional, now you're citing a statute

2) link to the espionage act preventing military officers from speaking to congress

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804915&forum_id=2Reputation#49475581)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 1st, 2025 7:21 PM
Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK


Just answer the question

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804915&forum_id=2Reputation#49475585)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 1st, 2025 7:23 PM
Author: NSAM's Schizoid Conspiracy Advent Calendar (gunneratttt)

i have no idea what you're asserting and it's clear neither do you, but here's my best shot:

the espionage act is not a part of the constitution, so asserting a violation of it is unconstitutional is nonsense.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804915&forum_id=2Reputation#49475588)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 1st, 2025 7:25 PM
Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK


The Espionage Act was enacted pursuant to the presentment clause, and the supremacy clause makes it the supreme law of the land.

Shoulda listened to NSAM!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804915&forum_id=2Reputation#49475593)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 1st, 2025 7:19 PM
Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK


The Espionage Act of June 15, 1917

Espionage

Section 1

That: (a) whoever, for the purpose of obtaining information respecting the national defence with intent or reason to believe that the information to be obtained is to be used to the injury of the United States, or to the advantage of any foreign nation, goes upon, enters, flies over, or otherwise obtains information, concerning any vessel, aircraft, work of defence, navy yard, naval station, submarine base, coaling station, fort, battery, torpedo station, dockyard, canal, railroad, arsenal, camp, factory, mine, telegraph, telephone, wireless, or signal station, building, office, or other place connected with the national defence, owned or constructed, or in progress of construction by the United States or under the control or the United States, or of any of its officers or agents, or within the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States, or any place in which any vessel, aircraft, arms, munitions, or other materials or instruments for use in time of war are being made, prepared, repaired. or stored, under any contract or agreement with the United States, or with any person on behalf of the United States, or otherwise on behalf of the United States, or any prohibited place within the meaning of section six of this title; or

(b) whoever for the purpose aforesaid, and with like intent or reason to believe, copies, takes, makes, or obtains, or attempts, or induces or aids another to copy, take, make, or obtain, any sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blue print, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, document, writing or note of anything connected with the national defence; or

(c) whoever, for the purpose aforesaid, receives or obtains or agrees or attempts or induces or aids another to receive or obtain from any other person, or from any source whatever, any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blue print, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note, of anything connected with the national defence, knowing or having reason to believe, at the time he receives or obtains, or agrees or attempts or induces or aids another to receive or obtain it, that it has been or will be obtained, taken, made or disposed of by any person contrary to the provisions of this title; or

(d) whoever, lawfully or unlawfully having possession of, access to, control over, or being entrusted with any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blue print, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defence, wilfully communicates or transmits or attempts to communicate or transmit the same and fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or

(e) whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blue print, plan, map, model, note, or information, relating to the national defence, through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be list, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, shall be punished by a fine of not more than $10,000, or by imprisonment for not more than two years, or both.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804915&forum_id=2Reputation#49475580)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 1st, 2025 7:22 PM
Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK


ITT we can observe that gunnerattt has never heard of the first amendment

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804915&forum_id=2Reputation#49475587)