Sort of like the Backrooms dude.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5905191&forum_id=2Reputation#50144047)

I think the real potential is in people that use AI in concert with other tools. We are probably not far from some 17 year old making a high quality feature film that he releases direct to YouTube.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5905191&forum_id=2Reputation#50144071)

I always laugh when I see middling-IQ AI boosters talking about how the increasing technical quality of AI will result in it evocating the same emotional reactions. My favorite is when they say this about porn; it makes me wonder these retards are also sexless. Bro, I don't jerk off because the appearance of a stretched-out anal muscle around a tube of flesh is so inherently beautiful and attractive; I jerk off because there's a REAL girl, like the ones I've known since HS and see everyday -- with their haughtiness and value and untouchable beauty and also their hidden traumas and insecurities and nasty sluttiness -- being put in her place and fucked hard and dominated and owned and ruined and sodomized and marked with cum, memorialized for all time on video for her future children and husband, if she can even have those now, by some tatted-up paunchy scumbag.

AI porn may replace like porn comics and shit, which have their own niche, but they'll never replace THAT. If it truly ever becomes the case that real porn girls can't verify themselves among the AI slop (and I can't see why that's the case, but let's assume it arguendo), it'll just kill all porn.

The counter argument here is just as laughably retarded as saying that fake AI-generated news articles ("Tidal wave destroys Shanghai") will replace real news due to its facial indistinguishability. No dickweed, you're missing the core point of why we're consuming this product.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5905191&forum_id=2Reputation#50144078)

You are not an exception to this, either. You're lying about it on the internet to try to seem like some kind of "badass" or something

Everyone will be consuming AI porn as soon as it's easy enough to generate locally for an otherwise clueless layperson. Many people already are

The reason why AI movies like the one further up in this thread aren't successful is because the movies are objectively bad. The quality of the production is good, but the actual content of the movies sucks, because very few people have the capability to make good movies. Even the professionals in present-day Hollywood are pretty bad at making movies, and that's their day job

Just going to remark again here how pathetic the post I'm responding to is, because I just re-read it again. This is like a whole new "archetype" of pathetic loser. The "Reverse Simp" who pretends to be "misogynistic" to try to seem cool to other people on the internet

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5905191&forum_id=2Reputation#50144092)

Not every product is sugary candy bar, you easily-visible top-of-the-head-bald-spot loser.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5905191&forum_id=2Reputation#50144110)

I did not think that there could be some archetype of male adult more pathetic than a simp but you've managed to achieve it

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5905191&forum_id=2Reputation#50144117)

walt jr is correct. The human element of porn is part of the appeal just like the human element of sports is what makes it great. They have robots who can hit a home run on every pitch but no one would pay money to see it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5905191&forum_id=2Reputation#50144226)