The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Will you watch my CA9 argument next week? "Swinging dicks" judge on panel (epah)
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 1st, 2026 11:44 PM Author: chocolate cruel-hearted foreskin Next Tuesday at 9:00 PDT One of my judges is this fellow: https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5845118&mc=6&forum_id=2#top |
Date: June 1st, 2026 11:45 PM Author: Swashbuckling ceo plaza (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2Reputation#49910820) |
|
Date: June 2nd, 2026 6:52 PM Author: Swashbuckling ceo plaza what's it about, your fee award on trendsettah or some robinson patman act stuff (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2Reputation#49911719) |
 |
Date: June 5th, 2026 4:19 PM Author: chocolate cruel-hearted foreskin Whether the UK company that owns OnlyFans is subject to personal jurisdiction in CA.
(We've sued them under CA's Automatic Renewal Law for automatically renewing "Fans'" subscriptions to "Creators" without disclosing that it'll be a recurring charge. Our kindly elderly judge determined that they're not subject to Jx in CA because they hadn't "specifically targeted" California consumers) |
|
Date: June 5th, 2026 4:24 PM Author: submissive base Lol jfc. Are there still open questions like *that* on internet minimum contacts? Just set up your site to not allow California IP addresses, like how when I take depos in red states now I have to use my imagination to jerk off because porn sites want my DL and birth certificate. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2Reputation#49917027) |
|
Date: June 5th, 2026 4:30 PM Author: chocolate cruel-hearted foreskin It's not *actually an open question, it's just a kindly elderly judge who assumed that Orrick biglolyers probably know a lot about jurisdiction, so we should do what they say. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2Reputation#49917032) |
|
Date: June 9th, 2026 1:58 PM Author: Haunting appetizing reading party hominid Are you going after the "creators" individually? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2Reputation#49925493) |
|
Date: June 9th, 2026 3:23 PM Author: chocolate cruel-hearted foreskin The Creators did nothing wrong. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2Reputation#49925689) |
|
Date: June 9th, 2026 8:24 PM Author: submissive base Might be the one time in history that class members would prefer an in-kind suck-n-fuck coupon settlement over whatever nominal $$ they'd otherwise get. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2Reputation#49926483) |
|
Date: June 5th, 2026 9:59 PM Author: Swashbuckling ceo plaza (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2Reputation#49917746) |
|
Date: June 8th, 2026 3:11 PM Author: chocolate cruel-hearted foreskin This is tomorrow guys FYI (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2Reputation#49923044) |
|
Date: June 8th, 2026 3:18 PM Author: vivacious casino I will jump on as soon as my property tax protest hearing is over. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2Reputation#49923058) |
|
Date: June 8th, 2026 3:19 PM Author: chocolate cruel-hearted foreskin Thanks man. First argument, and only 10 mins/side, so we'll be pau by 9:30 at the latest. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2Reputation#49923061) |
|
Date: June 8th, 2026 3:13 PM Author: well-lubricated electric hall Orrick v EPAH
Get your bets in now |
|
Date: June 8th, 2026 3:15 PM Author: chocolate cruel-hearted foreskin epah by a mile (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2Reputation#49923052) |
|
Date: June 8th, 2026 8:36 PM Author: Swashbuckling ceo plaza you've been litigating this since 2022? i didn't even realize onlyfans has been around that long - i guess it pays to be an early adopter (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2Reputation#49924087) |
|
Date: June 8th, 2026 8:41 PM Author: chocolate cruel-hearted foreskin Lol, yeah. Our SOL goes back to summer 2018. By the time of judgment it's going to be 10 years of all auto-renewals in CA. It'll be well over $1B by then. Unfortunately our only claim is under the UCL so it'll be a judge deciding, and obv he'll think of some way to pare it down, like perhaps to only the first renewal, and then say, "the user should have reviewed his cc statement and known better." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2Reputation#49924117) |
|
Date: June 8th, 2026 8:46 PM Author: Swashbuckling ceo plaza (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2Reputation#49924129) |
|
Date: June 9th, 2026 12:27 PM Author: vivacious casino Tremendous lawyering. I have not thought about such personal jurisdiction issues in years and the deep analysis was both majestic and scholarly. I also thought that your short rebuttal that put the focus back on the subsequent conduct of the Defendant was superb. Laser focused. You came back into the ring like Mike Tyson and dropped the mic on that nerd lawyer. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2Reputation#49925237) |
|
Date: June 9th, 2026 12:43 PM Author: chocolate cruel-hearted foreskin Lol thanks man. I’m now a little embarrassed to have even posted it, it was so uneventful (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2Reputation#49925288) |
|
Date: June 9th, 2026 12:45 PM Author: vivacious casino You did good. You had the better argument. How long are you staying in SF for? I wish I was in SF today. It's hot as fuck here. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2Reputation#49925300) |
|
Date: June 9th, 2026 1:46 PM Author: chocolate cruel-hearted foreskin It’s beautiful and 66 here rn but I’m headed back to the airport (after coming in at 6:00 on a redeye). Can’t stand to be away from HI even for a minute. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2Reputation#49925471) |
|
Date: June 9th, 2026 7:52 PM Author: Swashbuckling ceo plaza great report, sorry i missed it (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2Reputation#49926434) |
|
Date: June 9th, 2026 1:59 PM Author: Haunting appetizing reading party hominid What are damages like in Onlyfans-recurring-charges litigation? Do plaintiffs have a duty to mitigate? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2Reputation#49925494) |
|
Date: June 9th, 2026 3:26 PM Author: chocolate cruel-hearted foreskin On its face it's just restitution of the "unlawful" charges. We have Judge Breyer who is supposed to be unafraid of nuclear judgments, so we'll see what unfolds (there's surprisingly little caselaw as to whether at some point the consumer is required to review their charges and unsubscribe -- perhaps especially once they've first realized how it works) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2Reputation#49925699) |
|
Date: June 9th, 2026 7:56 PM Author: Swashbuckling ceo plaza (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2Reputation#49926437) |
|
Date: June 9th, 2026 8:00 PM Author: Haunting appetizing reading party hominid This isn't the most sympathetic class of plaintiffs though. What other remedies are available? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2Reputation#49926443) |
|
Date: June 9th, 2026 8:58 PM Author: Swashbuckling ceo plaza fraud is fraud (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2Reputation#49926552) |
|
Date: June 9th, 2026 9:08 PM Author: chocolate cruel-hearted foreskin The money has to go somewhere. It’d be weird for a person taking that moral view to conclude that it’s better for the pornographer to keep it than to give it back to the lonely masturbators and shut-ins. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2Reputation#49926576) |
|
Date: June 28th, 2026 12:08 AM Author: Emotionally + Physically Abusive Ex-Husband (oppose bitchbois) Just rewatched this. And realized that the case will likely be decided by the height transition from 18:16 to 18:30: https://youtu.be/V3P2ZxZwI9E?t=1096
Esp at 19:11, when the video guy is like, "whoa, this is a Tall Man," and has to adjust the camera.
Basically game over. |
|
Date: June 28th, 2026 12:13 AM Author: ....,....,.......,.........,....,.,.... That Tall Man is Cr and 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870537&forum_id=2Reputation#49966679) |
|
Date: June 30th, 2026 2:40 PM Author: Emotionally + Physically Abusive Ex-Husband (oppose bitchbois) Big surprise; we won.
Height-of-lawyer theory remains undefeated. |