XO POLL: Moast Intelligent Human Being Known In Human Hi$tory?
| cyan tanning salon | 07/04/25 | | exhilarant pocket flask | 07/04/25 | | Fighting windowlicker juggernaut | 07/04/25 | | adventurous godawful scourge upon the earth | 07/04/25 | | cyan tanning salon | 07/04/25 | | haunting marketing idea | 07/04/25 | | exhilarant pocket flask | 07/04/25 | | haunting marketing idea | 07/04/25 | | exhilarant pocket flask | 07/04/25 | | haunting marketing idea | 07/04/25 | | exhilarant pocket flask | 07/05/25 | | cyan tanning salon | 07/05/25 | | ultramarine box office | 07/05/25 | | cyan tanning salon | 07/06/25 | | ultramarine box office | 07/05/25 | | cyan tanning salon | 07/05/25 | | ultramarine box office | 07/06/25 | | rose coldplay fan bbw | 07/06/25 | | histrionic potus trailer park | 07/05/25 | | opaque ratface dysfunction | 07/06/25 | | histrionic potus trailer park | 07/06/25 | | haunting marketing idea | 07/06/25 | | histrionic potus trailer park | 07/06/25 | | haunting marketing idea | 07/06/25 | | arousing gay prole indian lodge | 07/05/25 | | sick brunch newt | 07/06/25 | | Impressive Immigrant Reading Party | 07/05/25 | | pea-brained stimulating library travel guidebook | 07/06/25 | | haunting marketing idea | 07/06/25 | | Supple locus azn | 07/06/25 | | haunting marketing idea | 07/06/25 | | Purple nighttime sanctuary personal credit line | 07/06/25 | | cyan tanning salon | 07/06/25 | | cyan tanning salon | 07/06/25 | | cyan tanning salon | 07/06/25 | | rose coldplay fan bbw | 07/06/25 | | cyan tanning salon | 07/06/25 | | opaque ratface dysfunction | 07/06/25 | | cyan tanning salon | 07/06/25 | | Supple locus azn | 07/06/25 | | sick brunch newt | 07/06/25 | | haunting marketing idea | 07/06/25 | | honey-headed fluffy cruise ship | 07/06/25 | | appetizing black menage really tough guy | 07/06/25 | | salmon charismatic dragon | 07/06/25 | | appetizing black menage really tough guy | 07/06/25 | | chrome idiot | 07/06/25 | | histrionic potus trailer park | 07/06/25 | | cracking meetinghouse | 07/06/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 4th, 2025 6:09 PM Author: haunting marketing idea
Past, I'm sticking with Feynman.
Present, my vote goes to Penrose.
We don't have sufficient information to speak to the majority of mankind, so it's really not a meaningful question.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2Reputation#49072538) |
 |
Date: July 4th, 2025 6:24 PM Author: haunting marketing idea
Can we really speak to ancient peoples? So little of their work and others' views of them is extant. Their popularity and contributions may be more a function of momentum than objective truths... just look at any old religious book.
I'd argue even the likes of Newton or Leibniz are too old to speak of in the same way as modern people.
I actually don't know much about Witten. I bet most scientists don't have Feynman's charisma & ability to communicate, though. (Just flip through anything Penrose has written.)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2Reputation#49072579) |
 |
Date: July 6th, 2025 4:33 PM Author: haunting marketing idea
A lot of writings (and the history of people) have been lost over the past 2.5k years.
There were also great contributions from India & the far East in classical & medieval times that most of us aren't aware of. (How many of us could name the author of Al-Jabr, let alone read it?)
We can speak of those the knowledge of whom is extant, or has been translated into our native language, but not so much to the 'most intelligent person ever.'
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2Reputation#49076775) |
 |
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:19 PM Author: haunting marketing idea
Who's to say that the four contributors to QED won't go down as the most intelligent, influential people of the history of the world 2.5k years from now?
I would argue that the most influential individuals aren't necessarily the most intelligent. The further back in time we go, the more influential an individual becomes. Some kid in 2021 with a wacky GUT hasn't had 2.5k years to gain the infamy of a Plato.
Besides, could Plato even handle UG physics at CalTech today? (Conversely, could a CalTech grad today do what Plato did c. 500 BCE?)
Obviously, OP's question has no absolute answer, but it's still fun to argue.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2Reputation#49077202) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 12:10 AM Author: pea-brained stimulating library travel guidebook
I think it has to be Newton, for coming up with calculus + figuring out all the aspects of practical physics.
The only other contender is Einstein, who on 2 occasions figured out things in physics that don't make intuitive sense at all.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2Reputation#49075462) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:26 AM Author: rose coldplay fan bbw
Short list:
Tesla, Newton, Da Vinci, Plato
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2Reputation#49075746) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 4:51 PM Author: sick brunch newt
Jansci von Nuemann
As much as I hate to nominate a turd, Ramanujan is easily a top contender
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2Reputation#49076800) |
|
|