\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

How o3 and Grok 4 Accidentally Vindicated Neurosymbolic AI

https://garymarcus.substack.com/p/how-o3-and-grok-4-accident...
cock of michael obama
  07/13/25
you posting gary marcus says everything
harold lauder
  07/13/25
i don't really have a strong opinion on how AI evolves excep...
cock of michael obama
  07/13/25
He is always eager to declare victory from a few weak, recen...
.,,,.,.,.,.,.,,,,..,,..,.,.,.,
  07/13/25
...
harold lauder
  07/13/25
I have never understood why symbolic reasoning supposedly ca...
Captain Pajeet
  07/13/25
this is exactly right. symbolic reasoning is being learned b...
.,,,.,.,.,.,.,,,,..,,..,.,.,.,
  07/13/25
Thank you for the compliment of validating my personal belie...
Captain Pajeet
  07/13/25
...
.,,,.,.,.,.,.,,,,..,,..,.,.,.,
  07/13/25
Lol fuckin Gary Marcus He's a great case study on why it'...
Captain Pajeet
  07/13/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: July 13th, 2025 4:44 PM
Author: cock of michael obama

https://garymarcus.substack.com/p/how-o3-and-grok-4-accidentally-vindicated

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5749924&forum_id=2Reputation#49098231)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 13th, 2025 4:46 PM
Author: harold lauder (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hPMyxMyJr-0)

you posting gary marcus says everything

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5749924&forum_id=2Reputation#49098239)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 13th, 2025 4:47 PM
Author: cock of michael obama

i don't really have a strong opinion on how AI evolves except that it will be to mankind's detriment

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5749924&forum_id=2Reputation#49098242)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 13th, 2025 5:13 PM
Author: .,,,.,.,.,.,.,,,,..,,..,.,.,.,


He is always eager to declare victory from a few weak, recent datapoints in a fast moving field. There is now a long history of him excitedly pointing out problems with current models that are resolved by the next generation of connectionist models. I predict the mechanics of these tools are learnable in such a way that anything currently “neurosymbolic” can be learned end to end with a connectionist model.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5749924&forum_id=2Reputation#49098313)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 13th, 2025 5:24 PM
Author: harold lauder (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hPMyxMyJr-0)



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5749924&forum_id=2Reputation#49098330)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 13th, 2025 5:40 PM
Author: Captain Pajeet

I have never understood why symbolic reasoning supposedly cannot be derived from/by connectionist models

This is almost certainly what is happening in the human brain, since symbolic reasoning is not something that humans naturally have 'out-of-the-box', and has to be learned. Until very very recently in our evolutionary history we were not capable of it at all, and probably ~50% of homo sapiens sapiens "humans" living in the world today are still not capable of it

I think he's right about the over-enthusiasm for LLMs in isolation and throwing money at scaling though. But I don't see it as a setback or a point of serious contention. It has still sped things up by dumping an enormous amount of money, resources, attention, and talent into AI, which would not have been dedicated to AI otherwise. It has been unequivocally a good thing

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5749924&forum_id=2Reputation#49098373)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 13th, 2025 5:55 PM
Author: .,,,.,.,.,.,.,,,,..,,..,.,.,.,


this is exactly right. symbolic reasoning is being learned by connectionist principles in the brain. it's not like you have synapses that can call a formal logic system to do other types of computations when necessary. it's all just learned connections.

i agree with you about the standard scaling view. i do not see scaling of the generic transformer architecture as likely to produce broad, human level capabilities. connectionism could implemented in many different ways though. i agree with him about the generalization problems with current models, but he makes the leap straight to "therefore we need symbolic methods." i think we just need a different form of connectionism - that's what the biology says.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5749924&forum_id=2Reputation#49098447)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 13th, 2025 6:05 PM
Author: Captain Pajeet

Thank you for the compliment of validating my personal beliefs about neuroscience and artificial intelligence

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5749924&forum_id=2Reputation#49098487)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 13th, 2025 11:09 PM
Author: .,,,.,.,.,.,.,,,,..,,..,.,.,.,




(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5749924&forum_id=2Reputation#49099221)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 13th, 2025 5:31 PM
Author: Captain Pajeet

Lol fuckin Gary Marcus

He's a great case study on why it's important to not be a fucking clown. He has been right about some things and he is imo right about his criticisms of LLMs but nobody takes him seriously because he's an obnoxious clown who is obviously on a personal crusade against people who he believes have wronged him personally

You can't cry wolf over and over again and expect to make a positive difference in the world or in your chosen field

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5749924&forum_id=2Reputation#49098342)