PROTIP: use "Websters dictionary defines..." to start ur closing
| Peach partner | 04/24/15 | | Balding Base | 04/24/15 | | Opaque fat ankles | 04/24/15 | | Talking gaping | 04/24/15 | | Sable hairless station | 10/22/15 | | Useless seedy marketing idea foreskin | 10/22/15 | | brilliant stage boiling water | 10/22/15 | | violet tanning salon son of senegal | 10/22/15 | | comical doobsian jew athletic conference | 10/22/15 | | Word combinations | 10/08/25 | | Territorial kitchen wagecucks | 10/22/15 | | Peach partner | 05/16/16 | | Naked Irradiated Chapel Macaca | 05/16/16 | | Peach partner | 05/16/16 | | Naked Irradiated Chapel Macaca | 05/16/16 | | Peach partner | 05/16/16 | | Slap-happy Vibrant Goyim | 12/28/16 | | cerebral institution | 12/28/16 | | big topaz stage knife | 12/28/16 | | Slap-happy Vibrant Goyim | 11/11/20 | | crystalline embarrassed to the bone office | 07/26/24 | | Paralegal Adolf Hitler | 10/08/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: April 24th, 2015 2:57 PM Author: Peach partner
It has a reputation now as this hackneyed expression, which is why it WORKS. The jury always perks up because it's so unexpected. Also it frames the issue very clearly: this is the plain definition, here are the facts, the facts don't match the accusation, acquittal. I literally bring a well-worn old dictionary and thump it onto the jury railing.
Prosecutors get flustered as FUCK and end up reacting to me rather than making their own case, and it makes them look gay as hell. They smirk or scoff, which makes them look like douches. They usually take time in their own closings to say something about "the defense counsel's old tricks and theatrics" but that just reminds the jury even more.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2862749&forum_id=2Reputation#27751704) |
|
|