The reason we have oil is because there was nothing that could eat early plants
| dashing slate sandwich | 01/06/26 | | salmon market | 01/06/26 | | deranged tripping electric furnace | 01/06/26 | | salmon market | 01/06/26 | | deranged tripping electric furnace | 01/06/26 | | salmon market | 01/06/26 | | dashing slate sandwich | 01/06/26 | | salmon market | 01/06/26 | | dashing slate sandwich | 01/06/26 | | supple indecent pocket flask | 01/07/26 | | ruby travel guidebook | 01/06/26 | | Henna University Weed Whacker | 01/06/26 | | deranged tripping electric furnace | 01/06/26 | | cream piazza mad cow disease | 01/06/26 | | deranged tripping electric furnace | 01/06/26 | | Histrionic Purple Potus Boistinker | 01/06/26 | | beta state | 01/06/26 | | wonderful parlour | 01/06/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 6th, 2026 11:29 PM Author: salmon market
again, i could be dead wrong but i think your claim is wrong. bacteria could decompose plants when plants first arose.
what bacteria could not originally do is decompose lignin created by trees but that was much later in time. that's how we got coal.
the leading theory about oil, on the other hand, was that it was organic material that failed to decompose because it happened to die in low oxygen environments.
am i wrong?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818203&forum_id=2Reputation#49568134) |
|
|