why do firms even care about law review?
| harvardjdmba | 02/07/10 | | TMF | 02/07/10 | | harvardjdmba | 02/07/10 | | TMF | 02/07/10 | | tortfeaser | 02/07/10 | | harvardjdmba | 02/07/10 | | steve | 02/07/10 | | rape101 | 02/07/10 | | Gogol Ganguly | 02/07/10 | | TMF | 02/07/10 | | lil_weezy | 02/07/10 | | Gogol Ganguly | 02/07/10 | | lil_weezy | 02/07/10 | | TMF | 02/07/10 | | ,.,.,.,.....,,....,...... | 02/07/10 | | ;;.....,,..,.,.,.,.,;;;:;.. | 02/08/10 | | TMF | 02/07/10 | | lil_weezy | 02/07/10 | | John Jacob Jingleheimerdood | 02/07/10 | | 121 pounds of fat chick | 02/07/10 | | Gregor | 02/07/10 | | ,,/.,/,/,/,/44.1,.,////>>>,.,.= | 02/07/10 | | TMF | 02/07/10 | | ..,,..,,..,.,.,, | 02/07/10 | | TMF | 02/07/10 | | 10 menstrually-synchronized megapoasters | 02/07/10 | | TMF | 02/07/10 | | 10 menstrually-synchronized megapoasters | 02/07/10 | | Fair_Balanced | 02/07/10 | | 10 menstrually-synchronized megapoasters | 02/07/10 | | Fair_Balanced | 02/07/10 | | Connie Chatterley | 02/08/10 | | random faggot | 02/07/10 | | .,,,...,,,.., | 02/08/10 | | FiredFrank | 02/07/10 | | .......,.,.,.,.,.,..,.,..,.,., . ,.,.,. | 02/08/10 | | LisaLexus | 02/08/10 | | Guy Noir | 02/08/10 | | Nontrad Brad | 02/08/10 | | ;;......;;...,,,;;; | 02/08/10 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |

Date: February 8th, 2010 7:57 PM Author: ;;.....,,..,.,.,.,.,;;;:;..
this is true, which is why secondary journals don't provide the same signal to law firms about capacity to pursue hours of mind numbing work. they usually put out fewer issues, each with fewer articles, and with a less rigorous selection and editing process. end result, much less work.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1215476&forum_id=2#14058281) |
 |

Date: February 7th, 2010 8:09 PM Author: ,,/.,/,/,/,/44.1,.,////>>>,.,.=
would publishing an article signal this?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1215476&forum_id=2#14047636) |
 |

Date: February 7th, 2010 8:18 PM Author: ..,,..,,..,.,.,,
If you write a publishable article about an issue relevant to your practice area, it can only help you. A historical survey of substantive due process might be bad, even if - and maybe especially if - it was original and well-executed.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1215476&forum_id=2#14047799) |

Date: February 7th, 2010 8:31 PM Author: FiredFrank
To summarize and expand:
1) Distinction. And as far as law school goes, a fairly legit distinction.
2) Many/most people at good firms were on LR.
3) LR work is relatively close to biglaw work.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1215476&forum_id=2#14048020) |
 |

Date: February 8th, 2010 8:27 PM Author: .......,.,.,.,.,.,..,.,..,.,., . ,.,.,.
#2 is way off. unless you're defining "good firm" very narrowly, as in wlrk, w&c, mto, etc. But if you define "good firm" more broadly, to include, say, kirkland, then "many" is probably an overestimate.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1215476&forum_id=2#14058549) |
|
|