\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

RESOLVED: JUDGES DECIDE CASES ON THE BASIS OF FAIRNESS, NOT LAW

Any credible disagreement with this proposition?
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  02/09/12
Did they not teach you about equity vs law? In old England t...
arrogant razzle business firm ladyboy
  02/09/12
See, e.g., JEFFREY A. SEGAL & HAROLD J. SPAETH, THE SUPR...
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  02/09/12
You think Segal and Spaeth haven't been criticized many time...
adventurous federal trust fund range
  02/10/12
I still think they're right, as flawed as their study might ...
Mahogany Den Hairy Legs
  02/10/12
http://www.hairfinder.com/celebrityhairstyles2/sarah-shahi2....
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  07/23/12
...
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  10/06/15
Gross simplification of British law.
Lime cracking indian lodge
  03/22/12
I tend to agree with slim. However, there are the rare occur...
Gold Sickened Fortuitous Meteor
  02/10/12
he is absolutely correct if you replace "fair" wit...
multi-colored trailer park windowlicker
  02/10/12
TYFT, brother. I agree whole-heartedly. Care to elaborate?
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  02/10/12
...
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  12/21/12
false (see dismissals on basis of statute of limitations pro...
Blue Plaza
  02/09/12
cr
abnormal space indirect expression
  02/09/12
provide please several citations to such dismissals along wi...
Comical genital piercing university
  02/09/12
...
low-t vivacious turdskin
  02/09/12
Duh! Those obvious cases are where the judge just applies th...
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  02/09/12
procedural defects aren't always clear-cut
sooty senate
  02/09/12
So do judges decide the bar on successive motions of habeas ...
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  02/09/12
don't know, don't care
sooty senate
  02/09/12
...
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  09/16/15
...
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  03/21/12
I find 'fairness' a weird name for what you're getting at
Mahogany Den Hairy Legs
  02/09/12
What's a better word? I am trying to say that a judge decide...
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  02/09/12
you are 100% correct
multi-colored trailer park windowlicker
  02/10/12
whats a better word then?
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  04/17/12
...
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  03/22/12
most procedural errors are corrected via motion for leave to...
at-the-ready ocher nibblets
  02/09/12
Very cogent, brother. Expand a little please.
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  02/09/12
no
at-the-ready ocher nibblets
  02/09/12
lol
indigo gas station rigor
  12/21/12
...
Contagious Ebony Theater Stage Chad
  04/07/17
(says something unintelligent about equitable tolling)
Red box office cuck
  02/09/12
Even tolling is applied according to fairly rigid doctrines....
Blue Plaza
  02/09/12
How about at the COA and SCOTUS level?
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  02/09/12
what an idiot
Mahogany Den Hairy Legs
  02/09/12
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Reynolds
domesticated pit foreskin
  02/09/12
What about Maher Arar, brother?
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  02/09/12
uh, by definition, thats what equity courts are supposed to ...
Purple clown
  02/09/12
even for courts of chancery, they decide on the basis of fai...
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  02/09/12
if chancery is the same as equity, then yes, that is the leg...
Purple clown
  02/09/12
...
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  02/09/12
well duh, they're courts of chancery
Red box office cuck
  02/09/12
...
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  09/23/12
Twist: the law is fair
gay cumskin brethren
  02/09/12
if law was fair, this guy would have gotten monetary relief....
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  02/09/12
But Slim, what argument that proceeding w his litigation sev...
gay cumskin brethren
  02/09/12
The invocation of the State Secret privilege in this case wa...
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  02/09/12
That statement standing alone seems a little conclusory. Des...
gay cumskin brethren
  02/09/12
read david cole's brief man. He litigated the case on appeal...
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  02/09/12
...
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  09/30/15
to be fair, no (see bush v. gore)
Bronze Aromatic Mad-dog Skullcap Pistol
  02/09/12
ya that was decided on the basis of fairness
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  02/09/12
Sarcasm?
gay cumskin brethren
  02/09/12
the conservative bloc thought it was fair to give the electi...
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  02/09/12
But you didn't think it was. amirite
gay cumskin brethren
  02/09/12
See, e.g., JEFFREY A. SEGAL & HAROLD J. SPAETH, THE SUPR...
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  02/09/12
...
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  10/20/15
...
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  03/13/12
lol, just lol
Bronze Aromatic Mad-dog Skullcap Pistol
  02/09/12
Korematsu v. US
crystalline boistinker tanning salon
  02/09/12
fairness again
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  02/09/12
Korematsu would disagree with you.
crystalline boistinker tanning salon
  02/09/12
then what did they decide the case on ? not on the law...on ...
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  02/09/12
exigency =/= fairness.
Mahogany Den Hairy Legs
  02/09/12
titocr
crystalline boistinker tanning salon
  02/09/12
define fairness, brother. is fairness some intangible, publi...
crystalline boistinker tanning salon
  02/09/12
See, e.g., JEFFREY A. SEGAL & HAROLD J. SPAETH, THE SUPR...
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  02/09/12
attitudes/values =/= fairness
Mahogany Den Hairy Legs
  02/09/12
You've never noticed that your COA judge decides on the basi...
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  02/09/12
attitudes are not fairness, brother. also, my judge (who I'm...
Mahogany Den Hairy Legs
  02/09/12
I know the law might suggest an outcome, but ultimately, in ...
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  02/09/12
why the fuck does that matter, a hard case by definition is ...
Mahogany Den Hairy Legs
  02/09/12
Hard cases are where the stakes tend to be extremely high on...
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  02/09/12
but you see, that's a HARD CASE about which the constitution...
Mahogany Den Hairy Legs
  02/09/12
There you go, brother. You just recognized my point. Have yo...
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  02/09/12
but strong indeterminacy is bullshit, 99% of law is settled
Mahogany Den Hairy Legs
  02/09/12
I just fucking said that. Christ. Thoughts on Critical L...
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  02/09/12
you so did not just fucking say that
Mahogany Den Hairy Legs
  02/09/12
Oh apologies, brother. I meant I was NOT advocating Crit. Th...
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  02/09/12
...
Jade roommate church building
  10/20/15
...
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  04/12/12
...
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  09/15/12
...
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  04/11/12
...
gay cumskin brethren
  04/12/12
...
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  07/13/12
...
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  04/14/12
i smoke cocks. not bragging. just being.
Big Cyan Base
  02/10/12
1s agin the best poast itt
abusive crackhouse
  02/10/12
Wrong. For example, there are tons of empirical studies show...
Cocky Swashbuckling Institution
  02/10/12
nice "pretending to not know that ssm is flame/retarded...
Mahogany Den Hairy Legs
  02/10/12
someone's gotta feed the fire man
Cocky Swashbuckling Institution
  02/10/12
Fairness includes ideological preference. All I am trying to...
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  02/10/12
...
gay cumskin brethren
  05/06/12
Apt, timely example: United States v. Jones. Whatever tha...
Stirring location skinny woman
  02/10/12
Thank you brother. Also, can you discuss whether Justice ...
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  02/10/12
FROM A JOB OPPORTUNITY--BASICALLY PROVES JUDGES DECIDE CASE...
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  02/26/12
Your position is interesting, and perhaps even persuasive, b...
impertinent territorial cruise ship candlestick maker
  04/14/12
Why, brother? Where you been?
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  04/14/12
Just messing with you man. I've been in lurk mode lately ma...
impertinent territorial cruise ship candlestick maker
  04/14/12
How is California legal practice treating u, brother?
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  04/14/12
I like it for the most part man. I'm getting put on some fai...
impertinent territorial cruise ship candlestick maker
  04/14/12
ahh nice, brother. Are you trying to open up your own place ...
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  04/14/12
that would be awesome, but I don't think I'm entrepreneurial...
impertinent territorial cruise ship candlestick maker
  04/14/12
pretty easy argument when you define fairness as anything th...
Jade roommate church building
  04/14/12
Your sophistication on these matters is utterly rudimentary....
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  04/14/12
explain in a cogent sentence please
Jade roommate church building
  04/14/12
http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?ar...
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  04/14/12
that's not a sentence brother. whose supreme court justic...
Jade roommate church building
  04/14/12
...
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  05/23/12
...
vermilion psychic
  10/07/12
...
vermilion psychic
  10/16/12
miss this guy
Fishy private investor hunting ground
  03/27/14
...
impertinent territorial cruise ship candlestick maker
  12/12/14
NFL refs too
Drab Sandwich Step-uncle's House
  10/06/15
...
Fantasy-prone massive property french chef
  10/20/15
...
Provocative site
  10/20/15
...
Contagious Ebony Theater Stage Chad
  04/07/17
...
Pea-brained Doobsian Round Eye Shrine
  05/26/18
...
Contagious Ebony Theater Stage Chad
  06/27/18
...
Pea-brained Doobsian Round Eye Shrine
  09/20/18
This is a question of legal philosophy. See “The Case of the...
yellow alcoholic azn
  09/20/18
Honestly, I agree, especially at the appellate level. If th...
Aggressive hyperventilating jew
  09/20/18


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 12:02 PM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef

Any credible disagreement with this proposition?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19930168)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 4:16 PM
Author: arrogant razzle business firm ladyboy

Did they not teach you about equity vs law? In old England they actually had two kinds of courts. One that ruled based on law and other that ruled based on fairness.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19931572)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 8:38 PM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef

See, e.g., JEFFREY A. SEGAL & HAROLD J. SPAETH, THE SUPREME COURT AND THE ATTITUDINAL MODEL (2001) (arguing that Supreme Court Justices decide cases based on political attitudes

and values rather than on legal considerations).

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19933309)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 10th, 2012 1:55 AM
Author: adventurous federal trust fund range

You think Segal and Spaeth haven't been criticized many times in the literature? Are you just now coming across this citation? Lol, brother, lol.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19935652)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 10th, 2012 2:02 AM
Author: Mahogany Den Hairy Legs

I still think they're right, as flawed as their study might be in this way or that

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19935681)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 23rd, 2012 2:13 PM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef

http://www.hairfinder.com/celebrityhairstyles2/sarah-shahi2.jpg

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#21155031)



Reply Favorite

Date: October 6th, 2015 12:30 PM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#28910878)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 22nd, 2012 12:38 PM
Author: Lime cracking indian lodge

Gross simplification of British law.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#20267597)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 10th, 2012 3:34 AM
Author: Gold Sickened Fortuitous Meteor

I tend to agree with slim. However, there are the rare occurrences when Judges rule in accordance with procedural law that results in an otherwise inequitable outcome. During the rare instances that I'm working on the defense side, I shoot for the quick technical win and sometimes you get the job done with the support from the Judge, all the while knowing that the other side clearly has merit.

I would hope that fairness dictates our judicial processes, but what is fairness? To say that ulterior motives are never a factor is to say that Judges are inhuman machines.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19935879)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 10th, 2012 8:26 AM
Author: multi-colored trailer park windowlicker

he is absolutely correct if you replace "fair" with "whatever the judge thinks is the "right" answer"

anyone who disputes this is a fucking retard.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19936282)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 10th, 2012 8:47 PM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef

TYFT, brother. I agree whole-heartedly. Care to elaborate?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19939799)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 21st, 2012 11:18 PM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#22294286)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 12:06 PM
Author: Blue Plaza

false (see dismissals on basis of statute of limitations procedural errors etc)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19930195)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 12:09 PM
Author: abnormal space indirect expression

cr

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19930213)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 12:09 PM
Author: Comical genital piercing university

provide please several citations to such dismissals along with a cogent and succinct summary of each case.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19930216)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 12:13 PM
Author: low-t vivacious turdskin



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19930248)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 3:16 PM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef

Duh! Those obvious cases are where the judge just applies the law. But in hard cases like Romer v Evans, Heller, and so forth, a decision is made on the basis of fairness.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19931274)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 4:05 PM
Author: sooty senate

procedural defects aren't always clear-cut

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19931518)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 4:06 PM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef

So do judges decide the bar on successive motions of habeas relief on the basis of fairness?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19931520)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 4:08 PM
Author: sooty senate

don't know, don't care

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19931531)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 16th, 2015 12:44 PM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#28766995)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 21st, 2012 10:47 AM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#20257024)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 5:43 PM
Author: Mahogany Den Hairy Legs

I find 'fairness' a weird name for what you're getting at

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19932013)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 8:08 PM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef

What's a better word? I am trying to say that a judge decides cases on the basis of his own personal view as to what the best/just outcome should be according to his own peculiar worldview.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19933138)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 10th, 2012 8:31 AM
Author: multi-colored trailer park windowlicker

you are 100% correct



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19936288)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 17th, 2012 9:00 AM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef

whats a better word then?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#20481268)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 22nd, 2012 11:58 AM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#20267364)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 3:23 PM
Author: at-the-ready ocher nibblets

most procedural errors are corrected via motion for leave to amend.

it can be argued that it is fair not to subject someone to suit after a significant amount of time (the limitations period) has passed.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19931301)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 3:24 PM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef

Very cogent, brother. Expand a little please.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19931304)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 3:27 PM
Author: at-the-ready ocher nibblets

no

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19931325)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 21st, 2012 11:33 PM
Author: indigo gas station rigor

lol

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#22294360)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 7th, 2017 11:03 PM
Author: Contagious Ebony Theater Stage Chad



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#33022612)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 5:48 PM
Author: Red box office cuck

(says something unintelligent about equitable tolling)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19932040)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 9:41 PM
Author: Blue Plaza

Even tolling is applied according to fairly rigid doctrines. OP's assertion is garbage at the trial court level where courts don't stray much from the rules and doctrines set forth from above. Obviously the Supreme Court is more likely to take account of fluffy policy considerations.

I guess it depends on how you define fairness. I believe OP is trying to argue that courts don't follow precedent or doctrines and make decisions according to their notions of justice and good policy which really isn't all that true at the lower court levels.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19933674)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 9:42 PM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef

How about at the COA and SCOTUS level?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19933679)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 12:09 PM
Author: Mahogany Den Hairy Legs

what an idiot

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19930214)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 3:32 PM
Author: domesticated pit foreskin

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Reynolds

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19931347)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 3:33 PM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef

What about Maher Arar, brother?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19931355)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 3:37 PM
Author: Purple clown

uh, by definition, thats what equity courts are supposed to do.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19931372)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 3:57 PM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef

even for courts of chancery, they decide on the basis of fairness

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19931470)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 5:50 PM
Author: Purple clown

if chancery is the same as equity, then yes, that is the legal standard they apply: what is fair.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19932054)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 9:26 PM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19933582)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 5:51 PM
Author: Red box office cuck

well duh, they're courts of chancery

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19932067)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 23rd, 2012 11:18 PM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#21645753)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 4:02 PM
Author: gay cumskin brethren

Twist: the law is fair

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19931502)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 4:04 PM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef

if law was fair, this guy would have gotten monetary relief.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maher_Arar

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19931513)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 4:07 PM
Author: gay cumskin brethren

But Slim, what argument that proceeding w his litigation severely impairs post-9/11 American foreign policy? I.e., fairer to protect American people than this dood. Your take?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19931528)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 4:09 PM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef

The invocation of the State Secret privilege in this case was invoked disingeniously.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19931537)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 4:11 PM
Author: gay cumskin brethren

That statement standing alone seems a little conclusory. Describe why if you could

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19931550)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 4:34 PM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef

read david cole's brief man. He litigated the case on appeal to the 2nd cir. with CCR

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19931671)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 30th, 2015 9:40 AM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#28867546)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 4:11 PM
Author: Bronze Aromatic Mad-dog Skullcap Pistol

to be fair, no (see bush v. gore)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19931546)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 4:11 PM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef

ya that was decided on the basis of fairness

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19931549)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 4:11 PM
Author: gay cumskin brethren

Sarcasm?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19931553)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 4:12 PM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef

the conservative bloc thought it was fair to give the election to bush.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19931556)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 4:15 PM
Author: gay cumskin brethren

But you didn't think it was. amirite

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19931565)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 8:38 PM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef

See, e.g., JEFFREY A. SEGAL & HAROLD J. SPAETH, THE SUPREME COURT AND THE ATTITUDINAL MODEL (2001) (arguing that Supreme Court Justices decide cases based on political attitudes

and values rather than on legal considerations

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19933314)



Reply Favorite

Date: October 20th, 2015 5:37 PM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#29008298)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 13th, 2012 2:30 PM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#20195801)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 4:12 PM
Author: Bronze Aromatic Mad-dog Skullcap Pistol

lol, just lol

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19931554)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 4:15 PM
Author: crystalline boistinker tanning salon

Korematsu v. US

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19931567)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 4:30 PM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef

fairness again

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19931650)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 5:39 PM
Author: crystalline boistinker tanning salon

Korematsu would disagree with you.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19931987)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 5:42 PM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef

then what did they decide the case on ? not on the law...on the basis of exigency and thus fairness

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19932005)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 5:49 PM
Author: Mahogany Den Hairy Legs

exigency =/= fairness.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19932046)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 5:55 PM
Author: crystalline boistinker tanning salon

titocr

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19932082)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 5:50 PM
Author: crystalline boistinker tanning salon

define fairness, brother. is fairness some intangible, public good which usurps the individual's rights in exigent circumstances? please provide no less than 3 cogent, relevant examples in an expeditious manner. ty

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19932052)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 8:07 PM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef

See, e.g., JEFFREY A. SEGAL & HAROLD J. SPAETH, THE SUPREME COURT AND THE ATTITUDINAL MODEL (2001) (arguing that Supreme Court Justices decide cases based on political attitudes

and values rather than on legal considerations)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19933128)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 9:32 PM
Author: Mahogany Den Hairy Legs

attitudes/values =/= fairness

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19933610)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 9:33 PM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef

You've never noticed that your COA judge decides on the basis of fairness a given complaint?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19933614)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 9:35 PM
Author: Mahogany Den Hairy Legs

attitudes are not fairness, brother. also, my judge (who I'm not working for yet) always seems to agree with the other judges on their panels, and I find it hard to believe they all have the same views about the "fairness" of this or that. but they do agree on the law

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19933625)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 9:37 PM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef

I know the law might suggest an outcome, but ultimately, in the hard cases, don't you think the judges just think that their reasoning is outcome-driven?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19933639)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 9:38 PM
Author: Mahogany Den Hairy Legs

why the fuck does that matter, a hard case by definition is one where the law has probably run out

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19933648)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 9:39 PM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef

Hard cases are where the stakes tend to be extremely high on both sides, and in which decisions on the basis of fairness are most often generated.

Thoughts on DeShaney v. Winnebago County? Read that case. notice how the Justices decide the merits on the basis of their personal vision of fairness.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19933655)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 9:45 PM
Author: Mahogany Den Hairy Legs

but you see, that's a HARD CASE about which the constitution really says absolutely nothing one way or another, so yeah, what else are you going to rely on but your personal vision of the law

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19933695)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 9:46 PM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef

There you go, brother. You just recognized my point. Have you ever read the Legal Realists like Alan Watson? They sort of make the same point. I am advocating a Crit position a la Duncan Kennedy, Roberto Unger or Mark Tushnet (i.e. a strong indeterminacy argument).

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19933705)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 9:51 PM
Author: Mahogany Den Hairy Legs

but strong indeterminacy is bullshit, 99% of law is settled

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19933744)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 9:53 PM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef

I just fucking said that. Christ.

Thoughts on Critical Legal Studies?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19933755)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 9:54 PM
Author: Mahogany Den Hairy Legs

you so did not just fucking say that

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19933767)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2012 9:56 PM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef

Oh apologies, brother. I meant I was NOT advocating Crit. Thoughts on Crit theory?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19933787)



Reply Favorite

Date: October 20th, 2015 6:34 PM
Author: Jade roommate church building



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#29008620)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 12th, 2012 11:40 AM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#20446400)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 15th, 2012 1:09 PM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#21584875)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 11th, 2012 6:32 PM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#20441378)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 12th, 2012 11:43 AM
Author: gay cumskin brethren



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#20446416)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 13th, 2012 10:58 PM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#21081826)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 14th, 2012 3:52 PM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#20462006)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 10th, 2012 2:03 AM
Author: Big Cyan Base

i smoke cocks. not bragging. just being.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19935686)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 10th, 2012 3:14 AM
Author: abusive crackhouse

1s agin the best poast itt

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19935822)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 10th, 2012 2:41 AM
Author: Cocky Swashbuckling Institution

Wrong. For example, there are tons of empirical studies showing a strong correlation between the outcome of case and a judges political preference. These studies are all based off of published opinions (17% of all federal circuit court decisions are published... yes, this is the actual statistic), which include almost all of the "hard cases." If you believe these studies have at least some value, then it becomes pretty clear fairness alone is an oversimplification.

Posner has written extensively on this. Its really a combination of many things - pragmatism, ideological identity, legalism, sociology, etc. Way too many factors influence judges decision to say it comes down to "fairness."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19935767)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 10th, 2012 2:43 AM
Author: Mahogany Den Hairy Legs

nice "pretending to not know that ssm is flame/retarded/both" schtick

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19935769)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 10th, 2012 2:47 AM
Author: Cocky Swashbuckling Institution

someone's gotta feed the fire man

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19935775)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 10th, 2012 8:59 AM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef

Fairness includes ideological preference. All I am trying to say--and to which you agree with--is that judges don't apply the law like its some brooding "thing" in the sky.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19936326)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 6th, 2012 3:35 PM
Author: gay cumskin brethren



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#20628241)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 10th, 2012 11:36 AM
Author: Stirring location skinny woman

Apt, timely example: United States v. Jones.

Whatever that mess of opinions actually establishes, it is a significant departure from settled Fourth Amendment doctrine. The Court just got creeped out by the "Big Brother" feel to it, and fished around for some way to say that the cops can't do that. Totally based on gut rxn, not sensible principles. Also, wrong, IMO.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19936767)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 10th, 2012 11:40 AM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef

Thank you brother.

Also, can you discuss whether Justice Alito's concurrence is based on notions of fairness?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#19936784)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 26th, 2012 12:59 PM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef

FROM A JOB OPPORTUNITY--BASICALLY PROVES JUDGES DECIDE CASES ON THE BASIS OF FAIRNESS

The normal procedure followed by a judge in working with a law clerk on a decision or order is to discuss the case with the law clerk, advise him/her of the decision and approach to be taken, as well as to discuss the style in which the decision or order is to be written. The law clerk then independently conducts the necessary research and prepares the draft decision or order for the judge's review. Outstanding critical analysis and writing skills are therefore essential. Law clerks will have the opportunity to sit in on parts of trials, oral arguments and mediations.

It is highly preferable for candidates to have taken the bar exam prior to commencing their clerkships. Appointees commencing work prior to passing the bar exam are designated by the Office of Personnel Management as "Law Clerk" – a designation that cannot under any circumstances exceed 14 months and cannot be extended. This means that the appointee must pass the bar exam before the 14-month period ends. Once admitted to the bar of any state, the appointee’s designation is converted to "Attorney Advisor."

The FERC law clerk position requires a firm two-year commitment. The energy field is highly technical and requires substantial training to achieve competence. Once achieved, however, this competence affords our attorney advisors highly coveted and otherwise unavailable employment opportunities, both within the agency and in prestigious private law firms throughout the country. FERC law clerks typically receive multiple job offers within weeks of becoming eligible to interview (after twenty-two (22) months of service).

As a general rule the starting grade for law clerks at FERC is GS-11, currently starting at $62,467, where one or more of the following apply:

(1) Top third of law school graduating class.

(2) Member, Law Review.

(3) Member, Order of the Coif.

(4) Winner of moot court competition; member of law school moot court team.

(5) Full-time or continuous participation in a legal aid program.

(6) Significant summer law office clerk experience, particularly in the economic or energy regulatory fields.

(7) Other equivalent evidence of superior achievement.

Law clerks also receive such annual cost of living increases as may be approved by the Congress each January. In addition, if performing at the fully successful level at the end of the first year, the law clerk will be eligible for promotion to GS-12, currently starting at $74,872 (plus any cost of living increases).

GEOGRAPHIC PREFERENCE

Washington Metro Area

POSITION TYPE

Entry Level Attorney

DESIRED APPLICANT TYPE

Current Student, Alumni

LOCATION(S)

City

Washington

State/Province

District of Columbia

Country

United States

COMPENSATION

See description section.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#20057958)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 14th, 2012 3:58 PM
Author: impertinent territorial cruise ship candlestick maker

Your position is interesting, and perhaps even persuasive, but I'm not sure that it is COGENT.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#20462036)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 14th, 2012 3:59 PM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef

Why, brother? Where you been?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#20462037)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 14th, 2012 4:06 PM
Author: impertinent territorial cruise ship candlestick maker

Just messing with you man. I've been in lurk mode lately man. Not poasting much. I guess I'm just haven't been feeling inspired enough to participate in the noble dialogue.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#20462068)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 14th, 2012 4:07 PM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef

How is California legal practice treating u, brother?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#20462073)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 14th, 2012 4:17 PM
Author: impertinent territorial cruise ship candlestick maker

I like it for the most part man. I'm getting put on some fairly interesting cases for how small the firm is.

Kinda stressing about developing a NICHE to separate myself from the general lit riffraff so I can lateral in a few years. Been trying to focus on environmental cases and the "business tort" cases (intentional interference with K, trade libel, etc.)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#20462128)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 14th, 2012 4:18 PM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef

ahh nice, brother. Are you trying to open up your own place in the Bay Area?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#20462136)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 14th, 2012 4:40 PM
Author: impertinent territorial cruise ship candlestick maker

that would be awesome, but I don't think I'm entrepreneurial enough. Would love to just lateral to a small firm in the Bay that does quality litigation, brother.

Are you working these days, brother?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#20462250)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 14th, 2012 4:01 PM
Author: Jade roommate church building

pretty easy argument when you define fairness as anything the judge bases his opinion on

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#20462042)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 14th, 2012 4:07 PM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef

Your sophistication on these matters is utterly rudimentary.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#20462074)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 14th, 2012 4:08 PM
Author: Jade roommate church building

explain in a cogent sentence please

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#20462082)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 14th, 2012 4:09 PM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef

http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1463&context=ilj

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#20462087)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 14th, 2012 4:16 PM
Author: Jade roommate church building

that's not a sentence brother.

whose supreme court justice's writing do you most admire brother

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#20462126)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 23rd, 2012 10:00 PM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#20754774)



Reply Favorite

Date: October 7th, 2012 7:25 PM
Author: vermilion psychic



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#21736756)



Reply Favorite

Date: October 16th, 2012 7:06 PM
Author: vermilion psychic



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#21803706)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 27th, 2014 10:56 AM
Author: Fishy private investor hunting ground

miss this guy

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#25270436)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 12th, 2014 4:59 PM
Author: impertinent territorial cruise ship candlestick maker



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#26918434)



Reply Favorite

Date: October 6th, 2015 12:37 PM
Author: Drab Sandwich Step-uncle's House

NFL refs too

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#28910900)



Reply Favorite

Date: October 20th, 2015 5:41 PM
Author: Fantasy-prone massive property french chef



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#29008326)



Reply Favorite

Date: October 20th, 2015 6:22 PM
Author: Provocative site



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#29008554)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 7th, 2017 11:02 PM
Author: Contagious Ebony Theater Stage Chad



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#33022599)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 26th, 2018 10:23 PM
Author: Pea-brained Doobsian Round Eye Shrine



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#36133889)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2018 12:17 PM
Author: Contagious Ebony Theater Stage Chad



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#36319016)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 20th, 2018 1:37 PM
Author: Pea-brained Doobsian Round Eye Shrine



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#36849122)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 20th, 2018 1:43 PM
Author: yellow alcoholic azn

This is a question of legal philosophy. See “The Case of the Speluncean Explorers” and analysis for further reading.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#36849153)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 20th, 2018 1:44 PM
Author: Aggressive hyperventilating jew

Honestly, I agree, especially at the appellate level. If there is any gray area and it could go either way, it is going the way they think is the right answer/consistent with their politics and views.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1869594&forum_id=2#36849165)