The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Whether it (homosex fuckbuggery) enervates the patient more than
| Hairless Locale Gaping | 04/15/12 |
| Hairless Locale Gaping | 04/15/12 |
| bright swashbuckling abode | 12/14/12 |
| Hairless Locale Gaping | 04/15/12 |
| Hairless Locale Gaping | 04/15/12 |
| Hairless Locale Gaping | 04/15/12 |
| Hairless Locale Gaping | 12/13/12 |
| Hairless Locale Gaping | 03/19/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: April 15th, 2012 1:31 PM Author: Hairless Locale Gaping the agent:
Montesquieu however seems to make a distinction — he seems to suppose these enervating effects to be exerted principally upon the person who is the patient in such a business. This distinction does not seem very satisfactory in any point of view. Is there any reason for supposing it to be a fixed one? Between persons of the same age actuated by the same incomprehensible desires would not the parts they took in the business be convertible? Would not the patient be the agent in his turn? If it were not so, the person on whom he supposes these effects to be the greatest is precisely the person with regard to whom it is most difficult to conceive whence those consequences should result. In the one case there is exhaustion which when carried to excess may be followed by debility: in the other case there is no such thing. |
Date: April 15th, 2012 1:35 PM Author: Hairless Locale Gaping According to the notions of the antients there was something degrading in the passive part which was not in the active. It was ministring to the pleasure, for so we are obliged to call it, of another without participation, it was making one's self the property of another man, it was playing the woman's part: it was therefore unmanly. (Paedicabo vos et irrumabo, Antoni [sic] pathice et cinaede Furi. [Carm. 16] Catullus. J.B.) On the other hand, to take the active part was to make use of another for one's pleasure, it was making another man one's property, it was preserving the manly, the commanding character. Accordingly, Solon in his laws prohibits slaves from bearing an active part where the passive is borne by a freeman. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1924596&forum_id=2#20468274) |
 |
Date: December 14th, 2012 3:17 AM Author: bright swashbuckling abode completely sensible (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1924596&forum_id=2#22246591) |
|
Date: April 15th, 2012 1:36 PM Author: Hairless Locale Gaping Julius Caesar was looked upon as a man of tolerable courage in his day, notwithstanding the complaisance he showed in his youth to the King of Bithynia, Nicomedes. Aristotle, the inquisitive and observing Aristotle, whose physiological disquisitions are looked upon as some of the best of his works — Aristotle, who if there had been anything in this notion had every opportunity and inducement to notice and confirm it — gives no intimation of any such thing. On the contrary he sits down very soberly to distribute the male half of the species under two classes: one class having a natural propensity, he says, to bear a passive part in such a business, as the other have to take an active part. (Probl. Sect. 4 art. 27: The former of these propensities he attributes to a peculiarity of organization, analogous to that of women. The whole passage is abundantly obscure and shows in how imperfect a state of anatomical knowledge was his time. J.B.) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1924596&forum_id=2#20468277) |
|
Date: April 15th, 2012 1:41 PM Author: Hairless Locale Gaping if we consider the time of gestation in the female sex we shall find that much less than a hundredth part of the activity a man is capable of exerting in this way is sufficient to produce all the effect that can be produced by ever so much more. Population therefore cannot suffer till the inclination of the male sex for the female be considerably less than a hundredth part as strong as for their own. Is there the least probability that [this] should ever be the case? I must confess I see not any thing that should lead us to suppose it. Before this can happen the nature of the human composition must receive a total change and that propensity which is commonly regarded as the only one of the two that is natural must have become altogether an unnatural one. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1924596&forum_id=2#20468305) |
|
Date: April 15th, 2012 1:44 PM Author: Hairless Locale Gaping I leave anyone to imagine what such a writer as Swift, for instance, might make upon this theme, “A project for promoting population by the encouragement of paederasty.” (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1924596&forum_id=2#20468329) |
|
Date: December 13th, 2012 3:01 PM Author: Hairless Locale Gaping (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1924596&forum_id=2#22242514) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2018 3:39 PM Author: Hairless Locale Gaping (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1924596&forum_id=2#35638929) |