The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
What do non-equity biglaw partners make?
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 2nd, 2012 3:31 PM |
Date: June 2nd, 2012 3:34 PM |
 |
Date: June 2nd, 2012 4:26 PM |
|
Date: June 2nd, 2012 3:43 PM |
|
Date: June 2nd, 2012 3:47 PM |
|
Date: June 2nd, 2012 4:08 PM |
|
Date: June 2nd, 2012 4:21 PM |
|
Date: June 3rd, 2012 2:57 AM |
|
Date: June 3rd, 2012 11:42 AM
I don't think it's typical, either. But the numbers show the average non-equity partner making like 55% of PPP. This is surprising because my understanding is that it's not that hard to make non-equity partner here. It might well be that some non-equity (and soon-to-make-equity) bros are skewing the numbers by pulling down huge bonuses. |
|
Date: June 2nd, 2012 3:51 PM |
|
Date: June 2nd, 2012 8:55 PM |
|
Date: June 2nd, 2012 4:22 PM |
|
Date: June 2nd, 2012 5:19 PM |
|
Date: June 2nd, 2012 6:38 PM |
|
Date: June 2nd, 2012 7:10 PM |
|
Date: June 2nd, 2012 8:05 PM |
|
Date: June 2nd, 2012 8:39 PM |
|
Date: June 2nd, 2012 10:55 PM Bonus range for non-equities ranges from de minimis to seven figures (with the latter obviously being rare and being the guys who are on deck to get promoted to equity). |
|
Date: June 3rd, 2012 4:24 PM |
|
Date: June 3rd, 2012 4:25 PM |
|
Date: June 4th, 2012 10:46 AM |
|
Date: June 3rd, 2012 12:35 PM |
|
Date: June 3rd, 2012 2:48 PM |
|
Date: June 3rd, 2012 2:52 PM |
|
Date: June 3rd, 2012 2:54 PM Kirkland first year non-equity partners did not get "massive" bonuses last year. They're still just senior associates by everyone else's metric. |
|
Date: June 3rd, 2012 2:54 PM |
|
Date: June 3rd, 2012 2:56 PM |
|
Date: June 3rd, 2012 2:58 PM |
|
Date: June 3rd, 2012 2:59 PM |
|
Date: June 3rd, 2012 3:01 PM
lolololol |
|
Date: June 3rd, 2012 3:02 PM |
|
Date: June 3rd, 2012 3:04 PM
Atrocious or not. We make a ton of $$$. No need to spread bullshit |
|
Date: June 3rd, 2012 3:07 PM |
|
Date: June 3rd, 2012 3:08 PM |
|
Date: June 3rd, 2012 3:12 PM Does your firm have a single Chambers ranking higher than mine? |
|
Date: June 3rd, 2012 3:14 PM
Since you work at a non peer firm, I'm sure my firm has plenty of higher chambers ratings. But let's talk about $$$ instead of this aspie bullshit
A) for one, unless you work at weil, our bk practice is better than yours B) unless you work at stb our PE practice is better than yours C) our litigation practice is better than yours D) our ip practice is better than yours
Toss my salad you little bitch |
|
Date: June 3rd, 2012 3:30 PM Actually, our creditor side BK practice is better than yours. I would happily put our PE client list up against yours. Our M&A, capital markets (both debt and equity) and finance practices are massively better than yours. I know nothing about litigation except that we're a hell of a lot better than you in our primary market and Band 2 vs Band 3 in NY doesn't suggest much of a difference. |
|
Date: June 3rd, 2012 3:35 PM
Answered.
You also outed your firm. LOL at it being a peer. We're done here. |
|
Date: June 3rd, 2012 4:03 PM |
|
Date: June 3rd, 2012 4:10 PM
I don't think anyone needs to drink the kool aid to agree with that. |
|
Date: June 3rd, 2012 4:23 PM For someone who purports not to care, you sure put a lot of energy into this. |
|
Date: June 3rd, 2012 4:28 PM
I hope you enjoy working at an inferior firm, making less money.
Jesus, the way you talk you'd think you were working at Cravath or something. But Latham??? Give me a fucking break. |
|
Date: June 4th, 2012 2:38 AM I actually really doubt you get paid more than I do and I don't even have to put up with the same bullshit you do in order to get it. |
|
Date: June 3rd, 2012 4:26 PM |
|
Date: June 3rd, 2012 4:29 PM |
|
Date: June 4th, 2012 2:37 AM |
|
Date: June 4th, 2012 7:08 AM
Give me a fucking break. You have ZERO ground to stand on. |
|
Date: June 4th, 2012 9:17 PM And LOL at the idea that Kirkland doesn't kick out massive amounts of people even in a good year. |
|
Date: June 3rd, 2012 3:20 PM
Just LOL. |
|
Date: June 3rd, 2012 4:24 PM |
|
Date: June 3rd, 2012 7:06 PM |
|
Date: June 4th, 2012 10:44 AM
|
|
Date: June 4th, 2012 11:24 AM |
|
Date: June 3rd, 2012 7:47 PM |
|
Date: June 4th, 2012 9:19 PM |
|
Date: June 4th, 2012 1:26 AM |
|
Date: June 4th, 2012 11:27 AM |
|
Date: June 4th, 2012 11:29 AM |