Got this response regarding compensation for a Midlaw Job
| Guys at HBS did that all the time. It was NBD, | 06/08/12 | | '''.....'''...'...'.'..'.'.'.'.'. | 06/08/12 | | Guys at HBS did that all the time. It was NBD, | 06/09/12 | | '''.....'''...'...'.'..'.'.'.'.'. | 06/09/12 | | Guys at HBS did that all the time. It was NBD, | 06/09/12 | | '''.....'''...'...'.'..'.'.'.'.'. | 06/09/12 | | Guys at HBS did that all the time. It was NBD, | 06/09/12 | | '''.....'''...'...'.'..'.'.'.'.'. | 06/09/12 | | Guys at HBS did that all the time. It was NBD, | 06/09/12 | | ..;.;.'.'.;'.;.'.;.';..';..;..;.;. | 06/09/12 | | Ed Harris beats his wife | 06/09/12 | | ,,,...,,......,,.... | 06/09/12 | | Guys at HBS did that all the time. It was NBD, | 06/09/12 | | Ed Harris beats his wife | 06/09/12 | | Guys at HBS did that all the time. It was NBD, | 06/09/12 | | The Gapper | 06/09/12 | | gooroo | 06/09/12 | | duskyahnoos | 06/12/12 | | Ed Harris beats his wife | 06/09/12 | | Guys at HBS did that all the time. It was NBD, | 06/09/12 | | '''.....'''...'...'.'..'.'.'.'.'. | 06/09/12 | | Mike Yanagita | 06/09/12 | | Ed Harris beats his wife | 06/09/12 | | Guys at HBS did that all the time. It was NBD, | 06/09/12 | | gooroo | 06/09/12 | | ,,,...,,......,,.... | 06/09/12 | | Guys at HBS did that all the time. It was NBD, | 06/09/12 | | '''.....'''...'...'.'..'.'.'.'.'. | 06/09/12 | | Guys at HBS did that all the time. It was NBD, | 06/09/12 | | ,..,.;.,.,;.,;..,,;.,.;..;,.,;,.;.;.;,,;,;.,,; | 06/09/12 | | ,,,...,,......,,.... | 06/09/12 | | Guys at HBS did that all the time. It was NBD, | 06/09/12 | | gooroo | 06/09/12 | | Guys at HBS did that all the time. It was NBD, | 06/09/12 | | ,.,,,.;,,,..,.,,.,::.::,,...,....;;,; | 06/13/12 | | Hayden | 06/09/12 | | Guys at HBS did that all the time. It was NBD, | 06/09/12 | | .......,.............;.;;;...;..; | 06/09/12 | | Guys at HBS did that all the time. It was NBD, | 06/09/12 | | Ed Harris beats his wife | 06/09/12 | | Guys at HBS did that all the time. It was NBD, | 06/09/12 | | Ed Harris beats his wife | 06/09/12 | | Guys at HBS did that all the time. It was NBD, | 06/09/12 | | Ed Harris beats his wife | 06/09/12 | | Guys at HBS did that all the time. It was NBD, | 06/09/12 | | Ed Harris beats his wife | 06/09/12 | | Guys at HBS did that all the time. It was NBD, | 06/09/12 | | wintergreen | 06/09/12 | | Ed Harris beats his wife | 06/09/12 | | wintergreen | 06/09/12 | | Ed Harris beats his wife | 06/09/12 | | wintergreen | 06/09/12 | | Ed Harris beats his wife | 06/09/12 | | wintergreen | 06/09/12 | | Ed Harris beats his wife | 06/09/12 | | ,.,...,..,.,.,....,,,..,.,.,.,...,.. | 06/09/12 | | Little Carmine | 06/09/12 | | .......,.............;.;;;...;..; | 06/09/12 | | Thread | 06/09/12 | | illtown | 06/09/12 | | Little Carmine | 06/09/12 | | illtown | 06/09/12 | | Guys at HBS did that all the time. It was NBD, | 06/09/12 | | illtown | 06/09/12 | | ...,,.,..,,..........,,,.,.,....,,....,........., | 06/12/12 | | ,.,...,..,.,.,....,,,..,.,.,.,...,.. | 06/09/12 | | Guys at HBS did that all the time. It was NBD, | 06/09/12 | | ,.,...,..,.,.,....,,,..,.,.,.,...,.. | 06/09/12 | | Guys at HBS did that all the time. It was NBD, | 06/09/12 | | .,.,...,..,.,.,:,.:......,:::,..,:,...:..:.,:.::, | 06/09/12 | | Guys at HBS did that all the time. It was NBD, | 06/09/12 | | Ed Harris beats his wife | 06/09/12 | | Guys at HBS did that all the time. It was NBD, | 06/09/12 | | Guys at HBS did that all the time. It was NBD, | 06/11/12 | | LetsNukeMedina | 06/13/12 | | Guys at HBS did that all the time. It was NBD, | 06/11/12 | | Ed Harris beats his wife | 06/11/12 | | Guys at HBS did that all the time. It was NBD, | 06/11/12 | | Ed Harris beats his wife | 06/11/12 | | Guys at HBS did that all the time. It was NBD, | 06/11/12 | | wait, what? | 06/13/12 | | Ed Harris beats his wife | 06/13/12 | | wait, what? | 06/13/12 | | Guys at HBS did that all the time. It was NBD, | 06/13/12 | | wait, what? | 06/13/12 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 8th, 2012 11:58 PM Author: Guys at HBS did that all the time. It was NBD,
I am a 7th year in biglaw making $265k plus whatever shit bonus we will get this year...I am talking with a recruiter about a midlaw job, and below was his response (from the firm) when I asked about compensation. Should I make the switch?
"Someone with your years of experience would likely make about $180,000 base in base salary (for 1600 hours), plus any bonuses earned. To the extent that an attorney bills more than 1600 billable hours on an annual basis, the attorney is entitled to an automatic bonus for each excess hour billed. Currently, the bonus is $180 for each hour billed in excess of 1600 hours up to 1800 hours and $200 for each full hour billed in excess of 1800 hours. For example, an attorney billing 1800 hours would be entitled to an automatic bonus of $36,000 and an attorney billing 2000 hours would be entitled to an automatic bonus of $76,000, bringing the comp to around $256k without any other discretionary or origination bonuses."
Thoughts? In some ways this almost sounds too good to be true....For perspective, this year I am on pace to bill and last year I billed around 2300 hours, so if I billed the same number of hours I would make the same amount at least...but I am pretty sure no one is billing even over 2k at this place.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1966831&forum_id=2#20852551) |

Date: June 8th, 2012 11:59 PM Author: '''.....'''...'...'.'..'.'.'.'.'.
wow 1600 is so low
do you think you'd have decent partnership prospects?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1966831&forum_id=2#20852557) |
 |

Date: June 9th, 2012 12:18 AM Author: Ed Harris beats his wife (earl)
it would not make sense to give you a bonus directly proportionate to billing if it were not tied to collections.
If they collect 2000 from me I should make around $250K all in, but I dont expect that since they are constantly giving little breaks to clients even though write offs are strongly discouraged.
I probably realize around 93% of my billing and that's higher than most firms.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1966831&forum_id=2#20852719) |

Date: June 9th, 2012 3:42 AM Author: ,..,.;.,.,;.,;..,,;.,.;..;,.,;,.;.;.;,,;,;.,,;
Are you in lit? I thought you can get that base as corp going in-house with 5-6 years. So it doesn't seem unreasonable. However, bonus seems too high.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1966831&forum_id=2#20853269) |
 |

Date: June 9th, 2012 4:01 AM Author: ,,,...,,......,,....
the bonus does seem pretty high. in midlaw thats probably like half his billing rate. is the firm really giving doods 50% of their billables, or more if it isn't on a collection basis, as this dood claims?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1966831&forum_id=2#20853290) |
 |

Date: June 13th, 2012 10:06 AM Author: ,.,,,.;,,,..,.,,.,::.::,,...,....;;,; (oh heartland up yours)
tcr I dealt with almost this exact situation a year ago. Glad I turned it down
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1966831&forum_id=2#20879154) |

Date: June 9th, 2012 12:00 PM Author: .......,.............;.;;;...;..;
I work at a firm with a similar setup. As a jr associate , I made 85% of biglaw base salary. There is an 1800 hour "aspirational" goal that gets you a bonus. Every 50 hours above that increases the bonus. It is not $180 per hour, but it is still more than enough to make working more worth it.
I went to this firm straight out of law school, and I've never doubted my decision. People on this site might define it as a boutique due to the size, but its still high end complex work. I have busy periods like anyone else, but I still manage to hit the gym hard, cook for myself, and I almost NEVER work on weekends. I don't even check my email until Monday morning most of the time.
I would go OP. $35,000-50,000 more or whatever it would be in biglaw is NOT worth it. This is an awesome time in your life to make good money because you can enjoy it. $200k+ in a big coast city can be a lot of fun if you actually have time to do stuff.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1966831&forum_id=2#20853894) |
 |

Date: June 9th, 2012 12:09 PM Author: Guys at HBS did that all the time. It was NBD,
If I had my weekends and even some of my weekday evenings free that would be a pretty big improvement.
The main draw is that midlaw clients are usually more reasonable. They don't constantly do deals with ridiculous deadlines and overly complex structures....I am getting tired of deals where you get a 20 page term sheet and find out it has to close in 2 weeks.
I don't have expensive tastes. $200k total and 1800 hours and sane clients sounds a lot better than 2300 hours (and a constant pushback to not bill more), $300k total and insane clients.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1966831&forum_id=2#20853926) |
 |

Date: June 9th, 2012 12:14 PM Author: Ed Harris beats his wife (earl)
they are reasonable in so far as they dont expect you to start jumping at 9 pm on Friday and never schedule calls on Sunday morning.
however they are less sophisticated, less smart most of the time, and FUCKING CHEAP.
they make it hard to bill 2000 hours. i get a lot of "do this but dont spend more than 3 hours on this"
i billed almost 70 hours this past week, but its been my business week all year. usually i am 9:30 to 7 and no work on the weekends. its a pretty good deal but when your friends in biglaw have slow billing years and get paid 30% more for less work you get pissed.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1966831&forum_id=2#20853952) |
 |

Date: June 9th, 2012 12:34 PM Author: Guys at HBS did that all the time. It was NBD,
less smart would be great to a point. It would be fun to seem like a genius rather than constantly feeling average or even below in terms of intelligence and stamina with a bunch of super smart incredibly hard working crazy people.
I don't foresee any slow billing years any time soon, so I don't think I am going to miss out on that.
70 hours is a shit load no matter what. I think this might be even more of a lifestyle firm than where you are at.
But no work on weekend or mostly not late at night would be a huge improvement.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1966831&forum_id=2#20853997) |
 |

Date: June 9th, 2012 12:51 PM Author: Ed Harris beats his wife (earl)
in the year and a half i've worked here i've come in twice on the weekend and only once I was asked to come in. i probably look at a lease or title report from my couch on Sunday once a month or every 6 weeks.
this week was hell, i closed 2 deals and came close to closing a third. billed 12-14 each day, but that would be normal for closing one deal in biglaw.
i work more than most people. the office is a ghost town at 8 pm.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1966831&forum_id=2#20854058) |
 |

Date: June 9th, 2012 12:57 PM Author: Ed Harris beats his wife (earl)
are you married with kids? i prefer not to work from home if i need my computer, slow ass VPN.
i can definitely plan weekday nights. almost never have to cancel on anything, but i usually dont make plans before 8 to be safe.
i dont think showing up an hour earlier would let me leave at 6.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1966831&forum_id=2#20854079) |
 |

Date: June 9th, 2012 1:28 PM Author: ,.,...,..,.,.,....,,,..,.,.,.,...,..
How the fuck are you just billing 2050 in NYC Biglaw? Vault range?? I want that.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1966831&forum_id=2#20854193) |

Date: June 9th, 2012 1:09 PM Author: illtown
Jesus.
I work 30-40 hours a week. NEVER over 40. I make about $140/yr.
I have too much free time.
I actually teach a class 3 days a week in the evenings.
I have 2 girlfriends.
When I hear people talk about making biglaw dough, it makes me want to earn more. But the hours and life sound life absolute shit.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1966831&forum_id=2#20854121) |
 |

Date: June 12th, 2012 10:12 PM Author: ...,,.,..,,..........,,,.,.,....,,....,.........,
flame
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1966831&forum_id=2#20877066) |

Date: June 9th, 2012 1:26 PM Author: ,.,...,..,.,.,....,,,..,.,.,.,...,..
You probably wont have the work to hill more than 1600
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1966831&forum_id=2#20854189) |
 |

Date: June 9th, 2012 1:39 PM Author: ,.,...,..,.,.,....,,,..,.,.,.,...,..
"slow" is a Biglaw word. 1500 average billables isn't slow for midlaw
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1966831&forum_id=2#20854224) |

Date: June 9th, 2012 2:12 PM Author: .,.,...,..,.,.,:,.:......,:::,..,:,...:..:.,:.::,
Sounds too good to be true. Are they actually ok with you only billing 1600? Also, even though they're hiring, this might suggest there isn't a lot of work to be had
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1966831&forum_id=2#20854352) |

Date: June 11th, 2012 12:56 PM Author: Guys at HBS did that all the time. It was NBD,
Update. Interviewed on Friday. Yes, the policy is actually based on billed hours by the attorney, not collected hours or even charged hours.
Starting to sound pretty good. Can't figure out what the catch is.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1966831&forum_id=2#20866902) |
 |

Date: June 13th, 2012 9:11 AM Author: wait, what?
I suppose it depends on the type of business. Where collections are a sure thing, yes, the biggest risk is discounting before the bill is presented. If I were dealing with individuals as clients, I'd be a lot more concerned about collections.
A lot of our stuff tends to be budgeted/capped, which is generally pretty transparent (i.e., everybody knows what the budget is). Outside of that, there isn't a huge incentive for partners to write off time, since that hurts them as well, although sometimes clients demand discounts after the fact.
As you suggest, being comped based on pure billables without any tie-in to efficiency at all would be the sweetest deal for the associate but would involve shifting almost all the financial risk to the firm, so I'd expect it to be rare, though not completely ludicrous.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1966831&forum_id=2#20879047) |
 |
Date: June 13th, 2012 11:12 AM Author: wait, what?
Sure, I don't doubt that it can be made to work, and certainly would help to recruit talent. I just think that given the typical level of greed/risk aversion/shortsightedness of most partners, such arrangements won't be common.
If you've found a place that's enlightened enough to assume most of that risk, and you've kicked the tires enough to be reasonably confident it's not a sham, then consider yourself fortunate.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1966831&forum_id=2#20879339) |
|
|