The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Hayek: Favored welfare for all (basic income). Reptiles: MAF
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 16th, 2012 2:49 PM Author: multi-colored rusted hairy legs (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#20898190) |
Date: June 16th, 2012 2:52 PM Author: multi-colored rusted hairy legs (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#20898203) |
|
Date: June 16th, 2012 2:55 PM Author: Exhilarant embarrassed to the bone legend OBVIOUS FLAME IS OBVIOUS. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#20898208) |
 |
Date: June 16th, 2012 2:56 PM Author: multi-colored rusted hairy legs Not flame, it is known, Khaleesi (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#20898214) |
|
Date: June 16th, 2012 3:08 PM Author: Exhilarant embarrassed to the bone legend I should have said troll. Poors already have a floor income, not sure what your point is. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#20898253) |
|
Date: June 16th, 2012 2:56 PM Author: fragrant magical senate messiness Do you mean a negative income tax? Friedman was proponent, too. And, no, reptiles are not MAF, retard. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#20898217) |
|
Date: June 16th, 2012 2:58 PM Author: multi-colored rusted hairy legs Many are MAF. You seem pretty mad generally IMO. And no, not a neg income tax specifically in Hayek's case (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#20898219) |
|
Date: June 16th, 2012 3:00 PM Author: fragrant magical senate messiness Only MAF at how polarizing shitlibbery has become recently. It's like they take every liberal position and assume that the opposite is by default the reptile position, regardless of the economics involved. Life is more nuanced than that, fortunately. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#20898225) |
|
Date: June 16th, 2012 3:02 PM Author: multi-colored rusted hairy legs Oh noes! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#20898230) |
|
Date: June 16th, 2012 3:09 PM Author: big blathering church building marketing idea (actual retard) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#20898257) |
|
Date: April 4th, 2016 8:13 PM Author: Poppy blood rage shrine ? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#30202270) |
|
Date: June 16th, 2012 3:09 PM Author: big blathering church building marketing idea 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#20898256) |
|
Date: June 16th, 2012 3:01 PM Author: multi-colored rusted hairy legs "The assurance of a certain minimum income for everyone, or a sort of floor below which nobody need fall even when he is unable to provide for himself, appears not only to be wholly legitimate protection against a risk common to all, but a necessary part of the Great Society in which the individual no longer has specific claims on the members of the particular small group into which he was born."
|
|
Date: June 16th, 2012 3:13 PM Author: Exhilarant embarrassed to the bone legend "It is unfortunate that the endeavor to secure a uniform minimum for all who cannot provide for themselves has become connected with the wholly different aims of securing a ‘just’ distribution of incomes." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#20898273) |
|
Date: June 16th, 2012 4:51 PM Author: multi-colored rusted hairy legs Right. But this doesn't negate his position above (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#20898738) |
|
Date: June 16th, 2012 3:04 PM Author: multi-colored rusted hairy legs "The basic conception of classical liberalism, which alone can make decent and impartial government possible, is that government must regard all people as equal, however unequal they may in fact be, and that in whatever manner the government restrains (or assists) the action of one, so it must, under the same abstract rules, restraint (or assist) the actions of all others. Nobody has special claims on government because he is either rich or poor, beyond the assurance of protection against all violence from anybody and the assurance of a certain flat minimum income if things go wholly wrong. Even to take notice of the factual inequality of individuals and to make this the excuse of any discriminating coercion, is a breach of the basic terms on which free man submits to government." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#20898237) |
|
Date: August 19th, 2013 10:18 PM Author: flatulent sanctuary bbw maf (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#23881828) |
|
Date: August 19th, 2013 10:18 PM Author: flatulent sanctuary bbw maf (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#23881829) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2014 9:45 AM Author: Azure slippery crotch spot (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#25783220) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2014 7:38 PM Author: Odious cuckold stead Who cares about that bitch. Penelope Cruz wasn't available? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#25792133) |
|
Date: May 17th, 2015 6:18 PM Author: Snowy site egregiously underrated (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#27910390) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2014 7:43 PM Author: Flickering Ceo Cuck This is like the standard position on welfare that almost all libertarians take:
Basic income combined with elimination of "hidden" welfare policies.
Shitlibs advocate for basic income but they want it in ADDITION to all the programs we have now. Dudes like Hayek/Friedman just want basic income, the idea being it's compassionate enough to not just let people rot and die but it doesn't result in all these people living off welfare for like their entire life. |
|
Date: April 4th, 2016 2:58 PM Author: Aphrodisiac dingle berry libertarians are in favor of welfare of any sort? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#30200248) |
|
Date: April 4th, 2016 3:03 PM Author: diverse misanthropic associate national security agency there is a libertarian spectrum from simple economic cons/social libs to anarcho-capitalists.
the idea of basic income plus dismantling of some of the current welfare state which, in theory, would rendered redundant due to the basic income is not anaethema to libertarism per se. |
|
Date: April 4th, 2016 3:06 PM Author: Aphrodisiac dingle berry yeah, it is. you've started your spectrum in an area that is not libertarian
|
|
Date: April 4th, 2016 6:32 PM Author: impressive trip national feces It respects the individual more because it allows him to spend it whatever way he wants. That's libertarian. It's disgustingly patriarchal to be like here's some stamps you can only buy certain food with. It also has the added benefit of having almost no administrative overhead. So you wouldn't have the vast bureaucracy of govt jobs that libertarians hate. And it's more efficient to boot so we could give more direct cash to ppl. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#30201479) |
|
Date: April 4th, 2016 7:01 PM Author: Aphrodisiac dingle berry you're just making shit up to fit your false narrative. once you've gone bitch and start accepting handouts, the libertarian principles of self-determination don't apply. you have forfeited those arguments by being a mooch. to the extent you are given any self-determination for how to spend your welfare, that's something you should be grateful for. it's not something you are entitled to. |
|
Date: April 4th, 2016 7:25 PM Author: impressive trip national feces Most libertarian economists favor minimum income. Not everyone is a Ted Cruz like hard line nut job about things (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#30201897) |
|
Date: April 4th, 2016 8:12 PM Author: Aphrodisiac dingle berry it's not a libertarian position, though. at most, it's a libertarian economist trying to figure out the least disgusting pill to swallow. once those economists leave their libertarian base, they are just choosing a pragmatic position along the liberal/conservative continuum. plus, your use of 'most' is specious. how many 'libertarian' economists are there? |
|
Date: April 4th, 2016 8:20 PM Author: impressive trip national feces I don't know, but Friedman and Hayek were YUGE supporters. Nixon tried to implement it. To the extent libertarianism only means near anarchy with no proper role of govt beyond courts (but very few enforceable laws) and defense spending (but maybe only in response to an imminent threat) then sure. But that's a mythical land that will never exist. Pragmatic libertarians are just conservatives who aren't down with the moralist wing of the party and who want to limit govt at every turn. So basic income is a great solution to the problem of the administrative welfare state (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#30202315) |
|
Date: April 4th, 2016 8:41 PM Author: Aphrodisiac dingle berry meh, we need cgm here. incentivizing welfare is the wrong approach. it should be burdensome and shame inducing. just giving losers money and thinking it will work out is naïve, wishful thinking. you know how many fast food places are hiring right now? all of them you know how many fast food places have been hiring the past 4 years? all of them you know how many fast food workers are better than welfare recipients? |
|
Date: April 4th, 2016 8:47 PM Author: impressive trip national feces Sounds like you are more just a hateful scrooge than a libertarian, bro (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#30202547) |
|
Date: April 4th, 2016 8:52 PM Author: Aphrodisiac dingle berry more narrative foolishness how is that hateful? |
|
Date: April 4th, 2016 8:54 PM Author: impressive trip national feces You'd rather have big govt than feel like someone is getting a free handout lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#30202607) |
|
Date: April 4th, 2016 8:55 PM Author: histrionic buff new version twinkling uncleanness (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#30202617) |
|
Date: April 4th, 2016 8:56 PM Author: Aphrodisiac dingle berry i never said i wanted big government. i disagree with your premise that structured welfare necessarily causes bigger government than cash payouts. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#30202633) |
|
Date: April 4th, 2016 9:31 PM Author: impressive trip national feces ? You have to have a vast admin state and due process shit and everything else when you do in kind transfers where a billion diff programs are separately means tested. Basic income would just be a single cash payment. It's really not disputable... (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#30202871) |
|
Date: May 17th, 2015 7:37 AM Author: Kink-friendly fishy piazza (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#27908142) |
|
Date: April 4th, 2016 1:48 PM Author: Kink-friendly fishy piazza (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#30199815) |
|
Date: April 4th, 2016 1:49 PM Author: Exhilarant embarrassed to the bone legend I favor basic income IF AND ONLY IF all other forms of welfare are eliminated (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#30199832) |
|
Date: April 14th, 2016 2:32 AM Author: Sooty Dashing Space Incel (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#30270276) |
|
Date: April 14th, 2016 2:52 AM Author: green depressive (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#30270322) |
|
Date: April 4th, 2016 1:57 PM Author: bateful hissy fit 350million Americans * $10k = $3.5Trillion
We could bring it down to around 300 bucks a month for a cool trillion. Remove Olds on SS, maybe 700 billion.
We're all fucked man who cares. |
|
Date: April 14th, 2016 4:02 AM Author: laughsome persian roast beef hayek was a shitlib unlike his mentor xo mises
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkQfK8hn0ds |