\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options

James Damiano admits stealing Bob Dylan's penis pump

...
,.,.,.,.,,,..,.,...,.,.,,..,.,.,.,,.,...,.,.,.,,,,  07/12/12
...
Really Cool Guy In Pre Faded Jeans Master Man  07/12/12
Bob Dylan's Stealing of James Damiano's Songs
GibsonDunn  07/13/12
i'm not a lawyer, but i would think that a court would rule ...
OSIRIS  07/13/12
...
Box Is Fucking Dead  07/13/12
exactly. jim, we know you're not a lawyer, so this may be h...
;;;'''...,,,  07/13/12
...
Box Is Fucking Dead  08/29/12
An Avalanche of Evidence Against Bob Dylan
GibsonDunn  07/13/12


Poast new message in this thread



Reply

Date: July 12th, 2012 4:08 AM
Author: ,.,.,.,.,,,..,.,...,.,.,,..,.,.,.,,.,...,.,.,.,,,,



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1991954&forum_id=2#21067675)



Reply

Date: July 12th, 2012 4:10 AM
Author: Really Cool Guy In Pre Faded Jeans Master Man



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1991954&forum_id=2#21067678)



Reply

Date: July 13th, 2012 4:22 AM
Author: GibsonDunn
Subject: Bob Dylan's Stealing of James Damiano's Songs

Bob Dylan's Stealing of James Damiano's Songs

http://www.jamesdamiano.yolasite.com

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1991954&forum_id=2#21075951)



Reply

Date: July 13th, 2012 4:24 AM
Author: OSIRIS (ggtp)

i'm not a lawyer, but i would think that a court would rule that the penis pump you took from bob dylan is considered due consideration for those songs.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1991954&forum_id=2#21075962)



Reply

Date: July 13th, 2012 4:25 AM
Author: Box Is Fucking Dead (current hedgehog cuddler)



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1991954&forum_id=2#21075967)



Reply

Date: July 13th, 2012 4:36 AM
Author: ;;;'''...,,,

exactly. jim, we know you're not a lawyer, so this may be hard to understand. if you take someone's penis pump, they get to take your songs. it's in the uniform commercial code as a mixed purpose transaction.

*this is not legal advice

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1991954&forum_id=2#21075988)



Reply

Date: August 29th, 2012 11:34 PM
Author: Box Is Fucking Dead (i belong to the blank generation but i can take it or leave it)



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1991954&forum_id=2#21455431)



Reply

Date: July 13th, 2012 4:23 AM
Author: GibsonDunn
Subject: An Avalanche of Evidence Against Bob Dylan

Bob Dylan's Stealing of James Damiano's Songs

An Avalanche of Evidence Against Bob Dylan

BOB DYLAN INVESTIGATED BY THE DOJ

DOJ INVESTIGATING BOB DYLAN LAWSUIT

U. S. Department of Justice

Mail Referral Unit

950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20530-0001

Re: DOJ Case No. 2462370

To Whom It May Concern:

My name is James Damiano and for over sixteen years I have been fighting in federal court to retain the

rights to my Intellectual Property from Bob Dylan for the theft of my entire song catalog, which has taken

thirty-seven years of my life to write. This catalog, in the hands of the right people, could be worth close to a half

a billion dollars. That should set the facts straight.

On June 16, 2009 the following letter was sent to Bob Dylan's Attorney Orin Snyder written by James

Damiano's Attorney Robert Church, regarding boxes of James Damiano's songs produced to Orin Snyder during

discovery. There were approximately fifteen to twenty-five boxes filled with anywhere from 200 to 400 finished

and unfinished songs in each box - thirty seven years of writing - that were never returned.

Dear Mr. Snyder:

I have one other matter. Mr. Damiano informs me that Steven Kramer (James Damiano's lead attorney)

had several boxes of songs delivered to Parcher & Hayes during the discovery phase of his case against

Dylan. Mr. Kramer never made copies of the documents, since I am presuming he felt pressed to comply

with an overdue discovery request. Mr. Damiano informs me that he has never had all the original songs

returned to his possession, even though the case is over. If you don't mind, please explain what you can

recall about Mr. Damiano's song production. Do you still have songs unaccounted for? Can they be

returned?

Sincerely,

Robert Church

Attached is a copy of my DVD detailing the allegations of theft leveled against Mr. Dylan in addition to

the similar allegations of judicial corruption filed by 5forJustice now 6forJustice.

This DVD includes Bob Dylan's publicist's testimony when asked "Have you ever lied to James

Damiano? Everyone I know that has seen this testimony believed it to be nothing less than shocking?

The enclosed DVD only supplies a small proportion of the actual amount of testimony that implicates

not only Bob Dylan aka Robert Zimmerman but also Judge Simandle for aiding in Bob Dylan's Stealing of James

Damiano's songs. There is another thirty four hours of testimony which I would be happy to produce upon

request.

Please Note: Judge Simandle's rulings are a hundred percent inconsistent with the facts of this

case. The DOJ is well aware that this case was illegally dismissed as per Rule 56 ( c ) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure. You know, Law 101?

Over seven years ago the following statement was downloaded by Bob Dylan's attorney Orin Snyder and

produced to the court yet never contested or denied either publicly or judicially. It was then downloaded two

more times and produced to Judge Simandle without being denied or contested and now rests within the docket of

the court.

It is judicially uncontested that Bob Dylan and people in Bob Dylan's entourage have solicited songs

written by James Damiano for a period of over ten years and eleven months

Another shocking fact in this case is Bob Dylan was subpoenaed to court and never appeared. Bob Dylan

has never produced an affidavit of denial regarding the facts and allegations produced in the complaint and or

during discovery. It appears Bob Dylan is above the law.

This DVD also incriminates Mr. Dylan's lead attorney Orin Snyder of LYING TO THE COURT by

signing his name to declarations stating that I am delusional. Mr. Snyder made this statement in light of the

testimony documented on this DVD which is one hundred percent adverse to Mr. Snyder's statement.

I was asked by the DOJ ������¢s as a favor to them to ���¯���¿���½ not to file criminal charges against Judge Simandle for

illegally dismissing my law suit against Bob Dylan. They also stated that they would Owe Me One So here's

your chance to live up to your word, and pay me back my favor.

Note: This is by no means a comprehensive account of the facts in James Damiano Vs Bob Dylan

CV95-4795 JBS.

Please file this DVD with their original complaint as the 5forJustice are now 6forJustice.

We stand united in our quest for getting our Constitutional right to a jury trial of our peers.

Links to my websites are also provided for reference.

http://jamesdamiano.yolasite.com/plaintiffs-motion-for-default-against-bob-dylan1.php

http://jamesdamiano.yolasite.com/

An Avalanche of Evidence Against Bob Dylan

http://bobdylanplagiarisms.yolasite.com/testimony.php

Judge Simandle's opinion was as bogus as they come

"To The Ear of This Court The Song's Don't Sound Similar"

Damiano's musicologist graduated Magna Cum Laude from Harvard and was a PhD.

Judge Simandle's Corruption as of rule 56 (C) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is well documented let us compare the facts of the case with the Judges opinion

The facts of the case are not at all consistent with the Judge Simandles Opinion

The law states that the verdict must be consistent with the facts of the case right. Let Us compare.

It's a ten thousand page lawsuit. Dylan and or his attorneys never contested any of the issues of fact on the website or in The Motion to the court which mirrors the website and the pdf file "Default Motion Against Bob Dylan"

Dylan's Attorney Orin Snyder download the website and produced it to the court without ever contesting even one issues of fact. There was no affidavit of denial.

Also Dylan was a no show to the subpoena.

Judge Simandle entered James Damiano's Motion For Default Against Bob Dylan upon the record 12/02/02 The Motion also included a motion for admission which included all the issues of facts on the website which mirrored the motion

Docket Link see 142

12/02/2002 142

Notice of MOTION for reconsideration of [139-1] order; to vacate protective order; for admissions of defendants; recusal of Judge Simandle; and for default against Sony Entertainment and Bob Dylan by JAMES DAMIANO, Motion set for 1/3/03 on [142-1] motion. (Exhibits in Binder Subm) (sb) (Entered: 12/03/2002)

Docket http://www.jamesdamiano.yolasite.com/james-damiano-bob-dylan-federal-court-docket.php

Now Compare the Motion to Judge Simandle's Opinion at Link

below but first see videos

Trailer 1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0lb8ZJjmzQ8

Trailer 2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=qRe-ZBozwac

http://www.jamesdamiano.yolasite.com/plaintiffs-motion-for-default-against-bob-dylan1.php

Plaintiff has been afforded Additional information since the development of the internet and only recently it has come to our attention that Bob Dylan lied to the court when asked if he had ever been sued for plagiarism His answer to the court was no. The fact is that he had been sued twice.

Cases to be cited soon

Also Dylan recently in a Los Angeles times interview admitted to plagiarism by definition :

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1991954&forum_id=2#21075959)