Date: July 13th, 2012 4:23 AM
Subject: An Avalanche of Evidence Against Bob Dylan
Bob Dylan's Stealing of James Damiano's Songs
An Avalanche of Evidence Against Bob Dylan
BOB DYLAN INVESTIGATED BY THE DOJ
DOJ INVESTIGATING BOB DYLAN LAWSUIT
U. S. Department of Justice
Mail Referral Unit
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001
Re: DOJ Case No. 2462370
To Whom It May Concern:
My name is James Damiano and for over sixteen years I have been fighting in federal court to retain the
rights to my Intellectual Property from Bob Dylan for the theft of my entire song catalog, which has taken
thirty-seven years of my life to write. This catalog, in the hands of the right people, could be worth close to a half
a billion dollars. That should set the facts straight.
On June 16, 2009 the following letter was sent to Bob Dylan's Attorney Orin Snyder written by James
Damiano's Attorney Robert Church, regarding boxes of James Damiano's songs produced to Orin Snyder during
discovery. There were approximately fifteen to twenty-five boxes filled with anywhere from 200 to 400 finished
and unfinished songs in each box - thirty seven years of writing - that were never returned.
Dear Mr. Snyder:
I have one other matter. Mr. Damiano informs me that Steven Kramer (James Damiano's lead attorney)
had several boxes of songs delivered to Parcher & Hayes during the discovery phase of his case against
Dylan. Mr. Kramer never made copies of the documents, since I am presuming he felt pressed to comply
with an overdue discovery request. Mr. Damiano informs me that he has never had all the original songs
returned to his possession, even though the case is over. If you don't mind, please explain what you can
recall about Mr. Damiano's song production. Do you still have songs unaccounted for? Can they be
Attached is a copy of my DVD detailing the allegations of theft leveled against Mr. Dylan in addition to
the similar allegations of judicial corruption filed by 5forJustice now 6forJustice.
This DVD includes Bob Dylan's publicist's testimony when asked "Have you ever lied to James
Damiano? Everyone I know that has seen this testimony believed it to be nothing less than shocking?
The enclosed DVD only supplies a small proportion of the actual amount of testimony that implicates
not only Bob Dylan aka Robert Zimmerman but also Judge Simandle for aiding in Bob Dylan's Stealing of James
Damiano's songs. There is another thirty four hours of testimony which I would be happy to produce upon
Please Note: Judge Simandle's rulings are a hundred percent inconsistent with the facts of this
case. The DOJ is well aware that this case was illegally dismissed as per Rule 56 ( c ) of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure. You know, Law 101?
Over seven years ago the following statement was downloaded by Bob Dylan's attorney Orin Snyder and
produced to the court yet never contested or denied either publicly or judicially. It was then downloaded two
more times and produced to Judge Simandle without being denied or contested and now rests within the docket of
It is judicially uncontested that Bob Dylan and people in Bob Dylan's entourage have solicited songs
written by James Damiano for a period of over ten years and eleven months
Another shocking fact in this case is Bob Dylan was subpoenaed to court and never appeared. Bob Dylan
has never produced an affidavit of denial regarding the facts and allegations produced in the complaint and or
during discovery. It appears Bob Dylan is above the law.
This DVD also incriminates Mr. Dylan's lead attorney Orin Snyder of LYING TO THE COURT by
signing his name to declarations stating that I am delusional. Mr. Snyder made this statement in light of the
testimony documented on this DVD which is one hundred percent adverse to Mr. Snyder's statement.
I was asked by the DOJ Ãƒï¿½Ã¯Â¿Â½ÃƒÂ¯Ã‚Â¿Ã‚Â½Ãƒï¿½Ã¯Â¿Â½Ãƒï¿½Ã‚Â¢s as a favor to them to Ãƒï¿½Ã¯Â¿Â½Ãƒï¿½Ã‚Â¯Ãƒï¿½Ã¯Â¿Â½Ãƒï¿½Ã‚Â¿Ãƒï¿½Ã¯Â¿Â½Ãƒï¿½Ã‚Â½ not to file criminal charges against Judge Simandle for
illegally dismissing my law suit against Bob Dylan. They also stated that they would Owe Me One So here's
your chance to live up to your word, and pay me back my favor.
Note: This is by no means a comprehensive account of the facts in James Damiano Vs Bob Dylan
Please file this DVD with their original complaint as the 5forJustice are now 6forJustice.
We stand united in our quest for getting our Constitutional right to a jury trial of our peers.
Links to my websites are also provided for reference.
An Avalanche of Evidence Against Bob Dylan
Judge Simandle's opinion was as bogus as they come
"To The Ear of This Court The Song's Don't Sound Similar"
Damiano's musicologist graduated Magna Cum Laude from Harvard and was a PhD.
Judge Simandle's Corruption as of rule 56 (C) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is well documented let us compare the facts of the case with the Judges opinion
The facts of the case are not at all consistent with the Judge Simandles Opinion
The law states that the verdict must be consistent with the facts of the case right. Let Us compare.
It's a ten thousand page lawsuit. Dylan and or his attorneys never contested any of the issues of fact on the website or in The Motion to the court which mirrors the website and the pdf file "Default Motion Against Bob Dylan"
Dylan's Attorney Orin Snyder download the website and produced it to the court without ever contesting even one issues of fact. There was no affidavit of denial.
Also Dylan was a no show to the subpoena.
Judge Simandle entered James Damiano's Motion For Default Against Bob Dylan upon the record 12/02/02 The Motion also included a motion for admission which included all the issues of facts on the website which mirrored the motion
Docket Link see 142
Notice of MOTION for reconsideration of [139-1] order; to vacate protective order; for admissions of defendants; recusal of Judge Simandle; and for default against Sony Entertainment and Bob Dylan by JAMES DAMIANO, Motion set for 1/3/03 on [142-1] motion. (Exhibits in Binder Subm) (sb) (Entered: 12/03/2002)
Now Compare the Motion to Judge Simandle's Opinion at Link
below but first see videos
Plaintiff has been afforded Additional information since the development of the internet and only recently it has come to our attention that Bob Dylan lied to the court when asked if he had ever been sued for plagiarism His answer to the court was no. The fact is that he had been sued twice.
Cases to be cited soon
Also Dylan recently in a Los Angeles times interview admitted to plagiarism by definition :