\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Mahler is the greatest composer in the history of mankind

hth
Floppy Gas Station Persian
  09/07/12
Bach, Beethoven, Mozart are consensus top three so that isn'...
fragrant sooty mood travel guidebook
  09/07/12
in on rina thread
Saffron useless stage rigpig
  09/07/12
Wagner is better, as is Bach.
violet zombie-like casino
  09/07/12
stfu. mahler was drifty and self indulgent. like salman rush...
comical church building
  09/07/12
he's certainly no purcell or even debussy. and thus he's no ...
Impertinent Lilac Native
  09/07/12
...
orchid violent jew
  09/14/12
...
comical church building
  09/14/12
The poster's statements, if true, most strongly support whic...
orchid violent jew
  09/14/12
1. It is somewhat improbable Mahler's GOATness, given the wi...
comical church building
  09/14/12
B is a trap. given the hierarchy implied in the passage i am...
orchid violent jew
  09/14/12
LOL yeah sure, tell that to the guy who wrote happy birthday
Hairraiser office
  09/14/12
is this true?
comical church building
  09/14/12
is what true, brother
Hairraiser office
  09/14/12
Bach, Beethoven, Dvorak, and Brahms are all better. And I'd...
Cocky Sepia Boistinker
  09/14/12
He's no Carl Nielsen.
Curious plum kitchen
  09/14/12
...
Adventurous pearly trailer park
  07/18/17
I a huge fan but I remember reading the line of beauty and i...
carnelian trip piazza foreskin
  07/18/17


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: September 7th, 2012 2:09 AM
Author: Floppy Gas Station Persian

hth

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2045490&forum_id=2#21518754)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 7th, 2012 2:14 AM
Author: fragrant sooty mood travel guidebook

Bach, Beethoven, Mozart are consensus top three so that isn't really possible. Mahler is def top 20 but he's not that great.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2045490&forum_id=2#21518790)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 7th, 2012 2:16 AM
Author: Saffron useless stage rigpig

in on rina thread

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2045490&forum_id=2#21518804)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 7th, 2012 2:28 AM
Author: violet zombie-like casino

Wagner is better, as is Bach.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2045490&forum_id=2#21518840)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 7th, 2012 3:00 AM
Author: comical church building

stfu. mahler was drifty and self indulgent. like salman rushdie. every ten minutes his music achieved something remarkable, but his flow was weak as fuck. ten minutes is a long time for failing to reward your audience's patience. this is why bill clinton's speech deserves only a 9.5 instead of a perfect ten; and mahler was no clinton.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2045490&forum_id=2#21518949)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 7th, 2012 3:06 AM
Author: Impertinent Lilac Native

he's certainly no purcell or even debussy. and thus he's no vivaldi or chopin. hencforth, he's no mozart or bach. in short, he's sps compated to the greats. but he's at least as good as james taylor.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2045490&forum_id=2#21518961)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 14th, 2012 6:10 AM
Author: orchid violent jew



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2045490&forum_id=2#21577050)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 14th, 2012 6:10 AM
Author: comical church building



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2045490&forum_id=2#21577051)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 14th, 2012 6:12 AM
Author: orchid violent jew

The poster's statements, if true, most strongly support which one of the following?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2045490&forum_id=2#21577054)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 14th, 2012 6:22 AM
Author: comical church building

1. It is somewhat improbable Mahler's GOATness, given the widely held positions of Bach, Mozart, and Beethoven.

2. That Wagner is superior to Mahler, there is no debating. Whose children are these?

3.Mahler in his medium produced insufficient results, similar to Rushdie's genius, because both are geniuses but this could mean little as to whether or not one should be remembered.

D. Only answers 2 and 3, not 1, from above.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2045490&forum_id=2#21577057)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 14th, 2012 6:46 AM
Author: orchid violent jew

B is a trap. given the hierarchy implied in the passage i am going for E

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2045490&forum_id=2#21577070)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 14th, 2012 6:48 AM
Author: Hairraiser office

LOL yeah sure, tell that to the guy who wrote happy birthday

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2045490&forum_id=2#21577072)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 14th, 2012 6:48 AM
Author: comical church building

is this true?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2045490&forum_id=2#21577073)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 14th, 2012 6:49 AM
Author: Hairraiser office

is what true, brother

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2045490&forum_id=2#21577074)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 14th, 2012 7:40 AM
Author: Cocky Sepia Boistinker

Bach, Beethoven, Dvorak, and Brahms are all better. And I'd argue Debussy and Chopin as well.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2045490&forum_id=2#21577104)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 14th, 2012 3:30 PM
Author: Curious plum kitchen

He's no Carl Nielsen.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2045490&forum_id=2#21579493)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 18th, 2017 7:03 AM
Author: Adventurous pearly trailer park



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2045490&forum_id=2#33800303)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 18th, 2017 7:14 AM
Author: carnelian trip piazza foreskin

I a huge fan but I remember reading the line of beauty and it was made out to be a prole gal so I never admit this anymore

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2045490&forum_id=2#33800314)