The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
POLL: what do you think of DUIing?
Poast new message in this thread
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:40 AM Author: vigorous space used to love that shit when i was in college... would drive home drunk as fuck from the bars, windows rolled down, blasting music. a few times i even had to stop and piss on the side of the road. loved to DUI.
now i fucking realize how lucky i was and what an idiot i was. i wont drive after more than 2 beers now - would swallow the costs and cop dat cab ride home (don't live in walkable city). is this a credited part of growing older and wiser? |
 |
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:43 AM Author: Cerise Histrionic Giraffe MADD is outta control and lies. this is why their founder left the org (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21526541) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:43 AM Author: brilliant range No. Get a driver. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21526542) |
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:58 AM Author: Titillating charcoal haunted graveyard nibblets no youre making the right choice dude. i dont know what else to say. honestly, you will eventually get caught and it just absolutely totally sucks. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21526579) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 3:09 AM Author: Motley address puppy not wise. DUI can really fuck your ass legally/financially nowadays.
and you don't want to be the dude that died in an accident cuz he was driving drunk. kid a year younger than me in high school killed himself in a single car accident. was just around the legal limit too. |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 3:16 AM Author: drab liquid oxygen institution even more, you dont want to be that guy who's "really good" at driving drunk until you fuck up. one of my relatives flat out plowed over two people who were stopped one night because a guy's car had broken down and someone was trying to help him. obviously they both died and his life is ruined and his parents, middle class are country churchgoers, are probably tore up as fuck (not to mention constantly gossiped about since it's the type of place where people still know each other) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21526620) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 3:18 AM Author: irate pungent forum link to local newspaper story? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21526629) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 3:19 AM Author: drab liquid oxygen institution it's already easy enough to out me, doobs (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21526632) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 10:42 AM Author: vibrant useless casino if you kill some innocent person, you'll hate yourself forever. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527058) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 10:51 AM Author: bearded telephone shrine ^^^^^ not who you thought the poster would be (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527086) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 10:51 AM Author: hyperactive harsh ape dilemma It's no more dangerous than tons of innocuous shit like talking on the phone, eating, or texting while driving. However, it's not worth the risk because a group of sleazy propagandists conned society into treating it as a serious crime. |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 10:52 AM Author: vibrant useless casino so dont text or eat while driving either. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527095) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 10:53 AM Author: hyperactive harsh ape dilemma Why? None of them are particularly dangerous, and it's highly convenient. More importantly, why does society treat them so differently? It's a huge injustice. |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 10:56 AM Author: vibrant useless casino you're right. society should support more behaviors which lower your level of control over a 4000 lb vehicle. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527111) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 10:57 AM Author: hyperactive harsh ape dilemma Allowing for personal convenience within a reasonable range of safety =/= supporting lowering your control. No one's suggesting prizes for most burgers eaten on the road. |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:29 AM Author: contagious trailer park depressive you should be gassed. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527296) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:30 AM Author: hyperactive harsh ape dilemma Sorry you got conned. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527306) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:31 AM Author: contagious trailer park depressive Sorry my cousin is brain dead because some 22 yo sorority sister ran a red light because she was too busy texting. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527317) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:38 AM Author: hyperactive harsh ape dilemma Great, plenty of people have cousins who are brain dead because someone was speeding. If they start advocating serious criminal charges for people who speed, they'll lose my respect too. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527362) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:40 AM Author: contagious trailer park depressive She wasn't speeding, and was so hysterical after the accident, told police she had been texting and didnt see the red light, which had been red for almost 8 seconds when she ran it. Like I said, gas yourself. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527376) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:42 AM Author: hyperactive harsh ape dilemma I wasn't implying she was speeding, just that the same thing happens with drivers who are being careless by speeding instead of by texting, and yet the victims' families don't usually become worthless, irrational fucktards on the issue like you've become. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527383) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:44 AM Author: contagious trailer park depressive Yes brother, not looking at the road AT ALL while driving is the same as not having enough time to stop because you were speeding. Seriously, the accident was completely avoidable had she just been PAYING ATTENTION. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527390) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:47 AM Author: hyperactive harsh ape dilemma There are degrees of both, bro. Some people look back and forth between road and phone while texting instead of being distracted for an extended period. Some people go 5 over the limit and some go 50. My point wasn't that the acts are equivalent in all respects, just that you're an irrational dumbass for letting your personal experience with the issue cloud your judgement. Families of speeding victims usually aren't that dumb. |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:50 AM Author: contagious trailer park depressive You must be unfamiliar with vehicular manslaughter. Plenty of people are charged with serious crimes for causing a fatality while speeding. If you are recklessly driving, whether that be because of texting or excessive speed, and you kill/permanently injure some one, there should be serious consequences. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527416) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:50 AM Author: hyperactive harsh ape dilemma You seem to be advocating a more general prohibition (either legal or cultural) against texting than the consequences through vehicular manslaughter charges. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527424) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:54 AM Author: contagious trailer park depressive I'm advocating 1. no texting while driving and 2. If you are texting while driving, and kill/seriously injure someone, there should be serious legal/financial consequences. I don't see how there are various degrees of "texting while driving", or why you think you are some kind of expert that can speak to the texting habits of EVERY person. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527449) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:58 AM Author: hyperactive harsh ape dilemma Our argument isn't matching up because I only disagree with #1, and you're only arguing in favor of #2. I only need to know the texting habits of two people to prove my prior statement. |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:03 PM Author: contagious trailer park depressive LOL. So edgy and cool. The argument for NO texting while driving is that it distracts you from you know, DRIVING. I don't care if you look away from the road for 2 seconds or 10 seconds. At 65MPH, 2 seconds is more than enough to drift into another lane or cross a double yellow and cause a major accident. Sorry you are such a massive piece of shit that you can't even give other drivers on the road the courtesy of not purposely distracting yourself. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527506) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:53 PM Author: hyperactive harsh ape dilemma Right, it creates a slightly higher risk of an accident. That's exactly what happens with speeding and a variety of other behaviors that don't cause you to label anyone a "massive piece of shit." You're being irrational as FUCK about this particular one, which is typical for an angry retard. |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:23 PM Author: contagious trailer park depressive LOL.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texting_while_driving#Research
So edgy, so cool. |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:45 PM Author: hyperactive harsh ape dilemma Congrats on supporting my point, champ. You're quibbling over the word "slight," but that's pretty fucking insignificant. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528373) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:48 PM Author: contagious trailer park depressive "The study revealed that when traveling at 55 miles per hour (89 km/h), a driver texting for 6 seconds is looking at the phone for 4.6 seconds of that time and travels the distance of a football field without their eyes on the road. Some of VTTI's conclusions from this study included that "texting should be banned in moving vehicles for all drivers", and that "all cell phone use should be banned for newly licensed teen drivers"."
"The study showed that at 35 mph, reading a text message decreased the reaction time the most, 0.12 and 0.87 seconds. Impaired driving at the same speed resulted in an increase of 0.01 and 0.07 seconds. In terms of stopping distances these times were estimated to mean:
Unimpaired: .54 seconds to brake Legally drunk: add 4 feet Reading e-mail: add 36 feet. Sending a text: add 70 feet"
"In March 2012 the UK's Institute of Advanced Motorists published a study which claimed that using smartphones for social networking while driving is more dangerous than drink-driving or being high on cannabis"
LOLOLOLOL. You're done here, move along. |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:52 PM Author: hyperactive harsh ape dilemma Holy shit you're dumb. Kill yourself. This is ALL STILL ABOUT RISK OF ACCIDENTS...the exact same thing I've been saying, you fucking retard. |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:55 PM Author: contagious trailer park depressive Yeah bro, next time you are on the highway just blindfold yourself for 5 seconds and see what happens to the RISK OF HAVING AN ACCIDENT. It is behavior that is completely unnecessary while driving and is incredibly unsafe, there really is no argument against not doing it. Just wait till you get to a fucking stop light to read or send a text.
|
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:58 PM Author: hyperactive harsh ape dilemma Um...most anti-texting laws treat texting at a stop light and texting while going 65 identically. I almost exclusively DO wait for stop lights. Even when you're driving, you don't have to look away for anything close to 5 seconds to send a text if you're competent. You're back to supporting my prior point about there being different degrees of the act that make a blanket prohibition SPS. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528468) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:00 PM Author: contagious trailer park depressive Move along little breh, you got outgunned ITT. Sorry there is absolutely ZERO research to support your positions. It seems you are the one acting like an irrational little fucktard.
/THREAD |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:02 PM Author: hyperactive harsh ape dilemma Seriously, PLEASE kill yourself. The world is a better place now that your brain-dead cousin won't be passing along your shitty family genes. None of the evidence you've posted disputes what I've said. |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:06 PM Author: contagious trailer park depressive Date: September 8th, 2012 10:51 AM Author: .,.,,..,.,,.,.,:,,:,...,:::,...,:,.,.:...:.,:.::,.
It's no more dangerous than tons of innocuous shit like talking on the phone, eating, or texting while driving.
However, it's not worth the risk because a group of sleazy propagandists conned society into treating it as a serious crime.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527087) ---------------------------------------------- Date: September 8th, 2012 10:53 AM Author: .,.,,..,.,,.,.,:,,:,...,:::,...,:,.,.:...:.,:.::,.
Why? None of them are particularly dangerous, and it's highly convenient.
More importantly, why does society treat them so differently? It's a huge injustice.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527099) ---------------------------------------------------
Convenient how you never say anything about "risk of having an accident" but when shown evidence that clearly states texting is very dangerous, which directly refutes your initial claim, you blather on about the risk of having an accident.
Who's being the irrational fucktard now?
|
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:15 PM Author: hyperactive harsh ape dilemma Your evidence doesn't say what you think it does. A sixfold increase in danger from one activity to another doesn't mean the new activity is very dangerous, just substantially more dangerous. Driving is a very low risk activity: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Traffic_related_deaths_-_Road_fatalities_per_vehicle-km.svg It really is still you. |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:16 PM Author: contagious trailer park depressive "It's no more dangerous than tons of innocuous shit like talking on the phone, eating, or texting while driving."
The studies show texting is significantly more dangerous than duiing, and talking on the phone.
You never had a chance ITT. Sorry you are dumb. |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:19 PM Author: hyperactive harsh ape dilemma LOL, did you not read what you just reposted? "It" in that sentence refers to drunk driving. You're arguing for my point in the sentence you quoted, just like your perspective in this entire subthread supports my original point (that the attention given to drunk driving is disproportionate). |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:21 PM Author: contagious trailer park depressive Yes, your arguments are about the relative dangers of one behavior vs another, NOT THE RISK OF HAVING AN ACCIDENT. The studies show that texting is the MOST DANGEROUS activity relative to things like talking and being intoxicated. You got pwned. If you want to talk about texting increasing accident rates, make another thread and stop trying to move the goal posts in this one. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528683) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:23 PM Author: hyperactive harsh ape dilemma My original goal post, which you so helpfully cited, was that the dangers of drunk driving are equal or less than the dangers of eating while driving, talking on the phone while driving, and texting while driving. Do you not see the irony of claiming to pwn me when you're arguing in favor of my original point? |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:24 PM Author: contagious trailer park depressive Do you not see that you have been arguing about texting while driving in this subthread??
|
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:25 PM Author: hyperactive harsh ape dilemma Do you not see the relationship between the secondary discussion and the original assertion? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528711) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:28 PM Author: contagious trailer park depressive Wow bro, your stupidity knows now bounds. I highlighted your original post to illustrate that your argument rests on the relative dangers of various behaviors as the reason why they shouldn't be illegal, not about the RISK of having an accident. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528737) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:35 PM Author: hyperactive harsh ape dilemma Date: September 8th, 2012 2:16 PM Author: ,.,...,..,.,.,:,.:,.,,,:::,..,;.,:,.,.:.:.,:.::,.
"It's no more dangerous than tons of innocuous shit like talking on the phone, eating, or texting while driving."
The studies show texting is significantly more dangerous than duiing, and talking on the phone.
You never had a chance ITT. Sorry you are dumb. --------------------------------------- Good effort, but no. You wouldn't have included that second sentence if that was actually your goal. You got confused and tried to cover for it. You also seem confused about this whole risk thing. Comparing relative risks is still a discussion of risk. I used that terminology to move the conversation away from comments like "the accident was completely avoidable had she just been PAYING ATTENTION" that are misleading about what actually happens in these cases.
|
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:39 PM Author: Shivering plaza half-breed you got destroyed in this thread brother. Your post clearly indicates you are talking about the danger of one behavior vs another. And I am also now dumber for having wasted 5 minutes of my life reading this sub-thread (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528803) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:40 PM Author: hyperactive harsh ape dilemma I never disputed that I was comparing risks; jesus fucking christ, where did you people get that idea? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528809) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:44 PM Author: Shivering plaza half-breed From your own posts. Relative risk =/= absolute risk. Texting is more dangerous relative to other actions while driving. That is all the justification you need to ban it. Your argument seems dumb and poorly thought out. Short of driving blind, the absolute risk of having an accident is still very small, that doesn't mean we shouldn't ban behaviors that increase the relative risk of having an accident. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528850) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:52 PM Author: hyperactive harsh ape dilemma Which post? My first post discusses relative risk; my second discusses absolute risk. This has always been a discussion that involves both. You'd have to support a pretty extreme police state to believe that any increase in relative risk should be banned without examining absolute risk. I don't think there's anything wrong with higher relative risk activity that doesn't cross certain absolute risk thresholds. |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:56 PM Author: Shivering plaza half-breed You'd have to be pretty dumb to think I would buy this argument. Your posts do not say what you are now claiming they do. The fact that you even tried to argue in favor of such behavior highlights your stupidity. You can have the last word, tell me to killself or whatever, but I have no desire to continue debating this issue with a stubborn douche. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528922) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:58 PM Author: hyperactive harsh ape dilemma I have no anger towards you. It's just a little disappointing that someone obviously more reasonable and intelligent than the other person still can't look past the trolling aspects of previous posts. What I said in my last post is what I've been arguing for all along. Do you really expect me to not be a dick towards someone who begins an interaction with "you should be gassed"? |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:04 PM Author: Odious smoky chad psychic Yeah. . .gassing yerself seems the only logical conclusion to your ranting. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528514) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:05 PM Author: hyperactive harsh ape dilemma Did you read the post you replied to? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528518) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:06 PM Author: Odious smoky chad psychic The sub-thread has gone outta control.
Whoever is the idiot that is advocating FOR DUI'ing is an idiot that should gas self. |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:15 PM Author: hyperactive harsh ape dilemma That subthread isn't about DUI'ing. It's about something far more dangerous - texting while driving. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528621) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 3:08 PM Author: Bronze Alcoholic Resort Circlehead LOL sounds like your cuz got PWNd (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528991) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:03 PM Author: Odious smoky chad psychic 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528509) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:01 PM Author: pearly unholy factory reset button TCR times a billion. Exactly right (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527495) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:44 PM Author: Razzle tank kitchen titcr. driving cars is inherently really dangerous. women go insane when their kids die though and have lobbied for these laws. funny how theres no FADD |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:51 PM Author: Bipolar aromatic police squad 180
|
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 10:53 AM Author: bearded telephone shrine reminder: nutella, an ASIAN WOMAN DRIVER, brags about her DUI skills (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527100) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 10:58 AM Author: yellow library i dont see the big deal (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527121) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 10:58 AM Author: Violent fat ankles I don't see the big deal. Most dudes I know are actually better drivers when kind of drunk because they take every precaution in the book not to get DUIpwned (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527126) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:34 AM Author: Concupiscible painfully honest hall rigor this. whereas numb fucking cunts are constantly LOOKING AWAY FROM THE FUCKING ROAD to text. Id rather deal with a hammered dude STARING at the road trying to keep it together than a sober slit giving 20% attention to the fucking road sober. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527339) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:42 PM Author: Violent fat ankles Yea, I'm actually incapable of driving below the speed limit for an extended period of time unless I've had a few drinks. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527849) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:52 PM Author: comical trust fund there was a bit of a controversy in Florida once when the newspaper did a story on some cop who had the highest rate of positive DUI stops in the state. She stupidly told them that the secret to her success was stopping anyone driving under the speed limit after 11pm. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527959) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:07 PM Author: Odious smoky chad psychic nice moniker. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528533) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:59 PM Author: comical trust fund thanks bro. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528935) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:05 PM Author: Odious smoky chad psychic *applauds*
Is shitty logic like this that keeps ProsecutorBros like myself employed.
Thank you and idiots like you who think that this is actually a "good idea". |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:03 AM Author: bull headed station really tough guy OP has the right idea, you gotta grow up. I used to DUI all the time in HS and had many close calls with police (including an accident, but it wasn't really my fault). My life would be very different now if I'd gotten a record.
Obviously driving drunk is fun as hell. If you miss the experience just try drunk bike riding and snowboarding and shit. It's still dangerous but you don't endanger other people to nearly the same extent and there's much less legal risk. |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:05 AM Author: hyperactive harsh ape dilemma In some states, drunk bike riding still counts as a DUI. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527165) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:30 AM Author: contagious trailer park depressive you can get a ticked for speeding on a bike in Central Park. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527303) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:42 AM Author: lilac hairraiser garrison digit ratio in CA biking while drunk is a crime, but not nearly as severe as a DUI. much lower fine, no license suspension, no DUI classes, etc. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527384) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:14 PM Author: gay associate What license could they possibly even suspend?
(assuming "bike" /= motorcycle) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:54 PM Author: hyperactive harsh ape dilemma Your driver's license. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527986) |
|
Date: September 9th, 2012 2:04 AM Author: amethyst trip stage masturbator Called a 'driver license' in CA, bro. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21533822) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:00 PM Author: flatulent lavender roast beef base I tried drunk snowboarding. Worst experience ever. Two runs and I was done. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528030) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:08 AM Author: Honey-headed jewess heaven I've had a few close calls and feel like by now I've surely used up all my luck not to have experienced anything really serious. I won't do it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527186) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:32 AM Author: Concupiscible painfully honest hall rigor drinking and driving isn't a game...it' a sport. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527328) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:42 AM Author: vigorous space my friends and i used to have a saying "drunk driving isn't a choice... its a lifestyle." we were thinking about making bumper stickers. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527382) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:57 AM Author: Concupiscible painfully honest hall rigor bravo! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527476) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:41 AM Author: thirsty cuckold Let it do what it do. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527378) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:41 AM Author: Excitant bespoke foreskin Support both driving while drunk and high. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527379) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:00 PM Author: Honey-headed jewess heaven I think driving while high is a different story. It kind of makes me feel more careful. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527490) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:12 PM Author: Excitant bespoke foreskin Going to Sheetz or 7-11 isn't nearly as exciting when you're not blazed as shit. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527560) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:10 PM Author: supple autistic pit drunk driving should be legal. there should be more severe punishments for moving violations or getting into an accident while drunk. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527546) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:16 PM Author: contagious trailer park depressive Shouldn't we be trying to prevent accidents, rather than waiting for the to occur? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527586) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:40 PM Author: Razzle tank kitchen allow cops to take drunks home without the criminal charge too then. I like his proposal (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527831) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:42 PM Author: contagious trailer park depressive Yeah, and also maybe make it like a moving violation, you should at least have to pay some type of penalty for a cop having to take you home. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527852) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:45 PM Author: Razzle tank kitchen yeah I'd be ok with that alright lets write a law review article |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:41 PM Author: Razzle tank kitchen I like this. I say make the penalties for the accidents the same as if the person had intentionally gotten in an accident. Impute their intent to drink to the wreck. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527840) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:53 PM Author: comical trust fund yeah man, but no flame, you get situations like this:
http://www.nbcmiami.com/news/local/Man-Sentenced-for-Killing-3-Kids-in-Accident-120888284.html
unfortunately, it is very difficult to deter the behavior. |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:55 PM Author: Razzle tank kitchen exactly. dui laws dont prevent that. they just penalize behavior that reminds moms of that shit (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527997) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:58 PM Author: supple autistic pit sounds like the system worked. i don't know the details of the previous reckless driving though. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528014) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:00 PM Author: comical trust fund at the cost of three dead kids. tough stuff. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528027) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:04 PM Author: Razzle tank kitchen idk how the system couldve prevented this. putting him away forever makes as much sense as anything (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528058) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:05 PM Author: comical trust fund yeah except that he probably got popped for DUIs but got a good lawyer and had them reduced to reckless driving. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528068) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:07 PM Author: Razzle tank kitchen assumes facts not in evidence (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528085) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:13 PM Author: comical trust fund 20 prior tickets, prior dui.
http://www.dreamindemon.com/2009/01/26/gabriel-delrisco-shouldnt-have-been-driving/ |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:17 PM Author: Razzle tank kitchen so whatre you arguing for? lifetime driving ban after 1? life in jail? I dont see how any law could prevent what happened. what he did was extremely illegal as it stands. taking his license wouldnt have stopped it. have to take his freedom (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528135) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:19 PM Author: comical trust fund i'm saying its a hard problem, dude. this thread reminded me of that story, which fucking sucks. the guy is a scumbag, its too bad that three kids got killed. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528146) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:21 PM Author: Razzle tank kitchen thats a valid observation then. reading that article it sounds like he was one of the worst drivers in history. a lot of that shit had to be alcohol related. |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:27 PM Author: comical trust fund right, what's funny is that Florida has a habitual offender law that is supposed to give the state the right to take people's licenses when they get like 20 moving violations. someone fucked up badly. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528209) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:05 PM Author: hyperactive harsh ape dilemma We'd prevent a lot more than three dead kids if we lowered all speed limits by 5 mph. But we don't, because it's not convenient. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528062) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:06 PM Author: comical trust fund does speed really matter that much? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528076) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:07 PM Author: hyperactive harsh ape dilemma Absolutely, both in terms of vehicle control and damage if an accident does happen. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528079) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:14 PM Author: comical trust fund interesting. i speed all the time, think speed limits are flame. guess i'm wrong. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528122) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:17 PM Author: bearded telephone shrine in germany, land of rational administration, you get punished if you get into an accident and there were texts sent from your phone just prior (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527596) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:22 PM Author: Soul-stirring international law enforcement agency This crime will be cuckolded by the advent of driverless automobiles. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527649) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:50 PM Author: bearded telephone shrine i enjoyed this use of the term "cuckolded" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527944) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:45 PM Author: cracking messiness brunch Random fact: I've never driven over the limit as far as I know. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527881) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:46 PM Author: Violent fat ankles How do you get home bro? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527898) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:47 PM Author: cracking messiness brunch I stay home, bro. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527905) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:52 PM Author: Violent fat ankles Who do you hunt then? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527966) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:14 PM Author: zippy church building party of the first part https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvTObqF3OD0
/thread |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:23 PM Author: flatulent lavender roast beef base Too lazy to copypaste (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528181) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:25 PM Author: wild insane indirect expression (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528191) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:35 PM Author: supple autistic pit the idea of getting caught or the idea of getting into an accident? the idea of getting caught scares me. the idea of getting into an accident doesn't phase me a bit. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528281) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:36 PM Author: comical trust fund idea of possibly killing someone doesn't phase you? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528287) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:37 PM Author: Violent fat ankles Why would it? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528297) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:38 PM Author: comical trust fund just do sociopath, bro. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528308) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:40 PM Author: Violent fat ankles No I mean, every time you get into a car and drive somewhere you could possibly kill someone. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528335) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:41 PM Author: comical trust fund good understanding of probabilities, bro. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528343) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:44 PM Author: Violent fat ankles It's pretty much 0 either way unless I'm totally shitfaced (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528362) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:45 PM Author: contagious trailer park depressive do you drive totally shitfaced? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528370) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:46 PM Author: Violent fat ankles No, but I do over .08 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528374) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:16 PM Author: Odious smoky chad psychic tcr (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528638) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:39 PM Author: wild insane indirect expression (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528325) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:40 PM Author: Violent fat ankles Scared of getting caught (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528338) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:39 PM Author: contagious trailer park depressive Edgy and cool. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528326) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:44 PM Author: supple autistic pit no more so than the idea of getting into a crash while sober. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528363) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:45 PM Author: Violent fat ankles If not for the whole legal aspect, I would much rather be wasted if I'm going to get in a wreck. It would be scary as hell sober and prob hurt more (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528369) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:49 PM Author: supple autistic pit yeah, i used to tense up a bit when engaging in a slightly risky passing maneuver or if another car surprised me with a sudden swerve. now i've trained myself to relax and loosen my body instead. it's safer if i get into an accident and allows better decision making under stressful circumstances as well. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528406) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:08 PM Author: racy step-uncle's house (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528537) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:18 PM Author: vigorous space my bros in hs used to do this all the time. nbd. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528648) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:37 PM Author: Shivering plaza half-breed (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528788) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:54 PM Author: Burgundy organic girlfriend private investor it is trashy, unprestigious behavior. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528911) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:55 PM Author: Bipolar aromatic police squad the only time i worry about it is when it's a high risk period e.g. the bars just got out thr/fri/sat; after a huge sporting event, etc. otherwise, game on.
i'm safer on the road after 12 beers than the 96 IQ woman with three screaming brats eating taco bell and talking on the phone to her best girlfriend driving around her baby daddy dodge durango. that's a fucking fact. she's on the road legally, i'm not, but there's no moral issue involved - purely statutory due to an intense retard prohibition organization that has become so extreme the founder disassociated with the entire enterprise.
non-DUI trolls are beta faggots who don't know how to drive or drink. i fully advocate that those people shouldn't be able to get behind the wheel after their requisite TWO appletinis. faggots. |
|
Date: September 9th, 2012 12:02 AM Author: Pontificating maize ladyboy new version cr, faggot. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21533086) |
|
Date: September 9th, 2012 12:03 AM Author: drab liquid oxygen institution (alpha pumo faggot who can also curl 235 with his 8" cock) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21533097) |
|
Date: September 9th, 2012 9:22 AM Author: mustard spot jap feels good man (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21534497) |
|
Date: April 25th, 2015 3:46 PM Author: milky french chef state (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#27758411) |