The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
POLL: what do you think of DUIing?
Poast new message in this thread
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:40 AM Author: razzle-dazzle massive point puppy used to love that shit when i was in college... would drive home drunk as fuck from the bars, windows rolled down, blasting music. a few times i even had to stop and piss on the side of the road. loved to DUI.
now i fucking realize how lucky i was and what an idiot i was. i wont drive after more than 2 beers now - would swallow the costs and cop dat cab ride home (don't live in walkable city). is this a credited part of growing older and wiser? |
 |
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:43 AM Author: diverse candlestick maker meetinghouse MADD is outta control and lies. this is why their founder left the org (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21526541) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:43 AM Author: Sooty mad-dog skullcap No. Get a driver. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21526542) |
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:58 AM Author: chrome lay becky no youre making the right choice dude. i dont know what else to say. honestly, you will eventually get caught and it just absolutely totally sucks. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21526579) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 3:09 AM Author: Beta parlour not wise. DUI can really fuck your ass legally/financially nowadays.
and you don't want to be the dude that died in an accident cuz he was driving drunk. kid a year younger than me in high school killed himself in a single car accident. was just around the legal limit too. |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 3:16 AM Author: crawly bateful national doctorate even more, you dont want to be that guy who's "really good" at driving drunk until you fuck up. one of my relatives flat out plowed over two people who were stopped one night because a guy's car had broken down and someone was trying to help him. obviously they both died and his life is ruined and his parents, middle class are country churchgoers, are probably tore up as fuck (not to mention constantly gossiped about since it's the type of place where people still know each other) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21526620) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 3:18 AM Author: aggressive school hissy fit link to local newspaper story? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21526629) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 3:19 AM Author: crawly bateful national doctorate it's already easy enough to out me, doobs (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21526632) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 10:42 AM Author: Passionate Menage Gaming Laptop if you kill some innocent person, you'll hate yourself forever. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527058) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 10:51 AM Author: iridescent cuckoldry ^^^^^ not who you thought the poster would be (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527086) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 10:51 AM Author: Self-absorbed coffee pot It's no more dangerous than tons of innocuous shit like talking on the phone, eating, or texting while driving. However, it's not worth the risk because a group of sleazy propagandists conned society into treating it as a serious crime. |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 10:52 AM Author: Passionate Menage Gaming Laptop so dont text or eat while driving either. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527095) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 10:53 AM Author: Self-absorbed coffee pot Why? None of them are particularly dangerous, and it's highly convenient. More importantly, why does society treat them so differently? It's a huge injustice. |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 10:56 AM Author: Passionate Menage Gaming Laptop you're right. society should support more behaviors which lower your level of control over a 4000 lb vehicle. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527111) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 10:57 AM Author: Self-absorbed coffee pot Allowing for personal convenience within a reasonable range of safety =/= supporting lowering your control. No one's suggesting prizes for most burgers eaten on the road. |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:29 AM Author: cream jet-lagged tank you should be gassed. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527296) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:30 AM Author: Self-absorbed coffee pot Sorry you got conned. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527306) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:31 AM Author: cream jet-lagged tank Sorry my cousin is brain dead because some 22 yo sorority sister ran a red light because she was too busy texting. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527317) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:38 AM Author: Self-absorbed coffee pot Great, plenty of people have cousins who are brain dead because someone was speeding. If they start advocating serious criminal charges for people who speed, they'll lose my respect too. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527362) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:40 AM Author: cream jet-lagged tank She wasn't speeding, and was so hysterical after the accident, told police she had been texting and didnt see the red light, which had been red for almost 8 seconds when she ran it. Like I said, gas yourself. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527376) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:42 AM Author: Self-absorbed coffee pot I wasn't implying she was speeding, just that the same thing happens with drivers who are being careless by speeding instead of by texting, and yet the victims' families don't usually become worthless, irrational fucktards on the issue like you've become. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527383) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:44 AM Author: cream jet-lagged tank Yes brother, not looking at the road AT ALL while driving is the same as not having enough time to stop because you were speeding. Seriously, the accident was completely avoidable had she just been PAYING ATTENTION. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527390) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:47 AM Author: Self-absorbed coffee pot There are degrees of both, bro. Some people look back and forth between road and phone while texting instead of being distracted for an extended period. Some people go 5 over the limit and some go 50. My point wasn't that the acts are equivalent in all respects, just that you're an irrational dumbass for letting your personal experience with the issue cloud your judgement. Families of speeding victims usually aren't that dumb. |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:50 AM Author: cream jet-lagged tank You must be unfamiliar with vehicular manslaughter. Plenty of people are charged with serious crimes for causing a fatality while speeding. If you are recklessly driving, whether that be because of texting or excessive speed, and you kill/permanently injure some one, there should be serious consequences. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527416) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:50 AM Author: Self-absorbed coffee pot You seem to be advocating a more general prohibition (either legal or cultural) against texting than the consequences through vehicular manslaughter charges. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527424) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:54 AM Author: cream jet-lagged tank I'm advocating 1. no texting while driving and 2. If you are texting while driving, and kill/seriously injure someone, there should be serious legal/financial consequences. I don't see how there are various degrees of "texting while driving", or why you think you are some kind of expert that can speak to the texting habits of EVERY person. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527449) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:58 AM Author: Self-absorbed coffee pot Our argument isn't matching up because I only disagree with #1, and you're only arguing in favor of #2. I only need to know the texting habits of two people to prove my prior statement. |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:03 PM Author: cream jet-lagged tank LOL. So edgy and cool. The argument for NO texting while driving is that it distracts you from you know, DRIVING. I don't care if you look away from the road for 2 seconds or 10 seconds. At 65MPH, 2 seconds is more than enough to drift into another lane or cross a double yellow and cause a major accident. Sorry you are such a massive piece of shit that you can't even give other drivers on the road the courtesy of not purposely distracting yourself. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527506) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:53 PM Author: Self-absorbed coffee pot Right, it creates a slightly higher risk of an accident. That's exactly what happens with speeding and a variety of other behaviors that don't cause you to label anyone a "massive piece of shit." You're being irrational as FUCK about this particular one, which is typical for an angry retard. |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:23 PM Author: cream jet-lagged tank LOL.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texting_while_driving#Research
So edgy, so cool. |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:45 PM Author: Self-absorbed coffee pot Congrats on supporting my point, champ. You're quibbling over the word "slight," but that's pretty fucking insignificant. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528373) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:48 PM Author: cream jet-lagged tank "The study revealed that when traveling at 55 miles per hour (89 km/h), a driver texting for 6 seconds is looking at the phone for 4.6 seconds of that time and travels the distance of a football field without their eyes on the road. Some of VTTI's conclusions from this study included that "texting should be banned in moving vehicles for all drivers", and that "all cell phone use should be banned for newly licensed teen drivers"."
"The study showed that at 35 mph, reading a text message decreased the reaction time the most, 0.12 and 0.87 seconds. Impaired driving at the same speed resulted in an increase of 0.01 and 0.07 seconds. In terms of stopping distances these times were estimated to mean:
Unimpaired: .54 seconds to brake Legally drunk: add 4 feet Reading e-mail: add 36 feet. Sending a text: add 70 feet"
"In March 2012 the UK's Institute of Advanced Motorists published a study which claimed that using smartphones for social networking while driving is more dangerous than drink-driving or being high on cannabis"
LOLOLOLOL. You're done here, move along. |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:52 PM Author: Self-absorbed coffee pot Holy shit you're dumb. Kill yourself. This is ALL STILL ABOUT RISK OF ACCIDENTS...the exact same thing I've been saying, you fucking retard. |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:55 PM Author: cream jet-lagged tank Yeah bro, next time you are on the highway just blindfold yourself for 5 seconds and see what happens to the RISK OF HAVING AN ACCIDENT. It is behavior that is completely unnecessary while driving and is incredibly unsafe, there really is no argument against not doing it. Just wait till you get to a fucking stop light to read or send a text.
|
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:58 PM Author: Self-absorbed coffee pot Um...most anti-texting laws treat texting at a stop light and texting while going 65 identically. I almost exclusively DO wait for stop lights. Even when you're driving, you don't have to look away for anything close to 5 seconds to send a text if you're competent. You're back to supporting my prior point about there being different degrees of the act that make a blanket prohibition SPS. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528468) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:00 PM Author: cream jet-lagged tank Move along little breh, you got outgunned ITT. Sorry there is absolutely ZERO research to support your positions. It seems you are the one acting like an irrational little fucktard.
/THREAD |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:02 PM Author: Self-absorbed coffee pot Seriously, PLEASE kill yourself. The world is a better place now that your brain-dead cousin won't be passing along your shitty family genes. None of the evidence you've posted disputes what I've said. |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:06 PM Author: cream jet-lagged tank Date: September 8th, 2012 10:51 AM Author: .,.,,..,.,,.,.,:,,:,...,:::,...,:,.,.:...:.,:.::,.
It's no more dangerous than tons of innocuous shit like talking on the phone, eating, or texting while driving.
However, it's not worth the risk because a group of sleazy propagandists conned society into treating it as a serious crime.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527087) ---------------------------------------------- Date: September 8th, 2012 10:53 AM Author: .,.,,..,.,,.,.,:,,:,...,:::,...,:,.,.:...:.,:.::,.
Why? None of them are particularly dangerous, and it's highly convenient.
More importantly, why does society treat them so differently? It's a huge injustice.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527099) ---------------------------------------------------
Convenient how you never say anything about "risk of having an accident" but when shown evidence that clearly states texting is very dangerous, which directly refutes your initial claim, you blather on about the risk of having an accident.
Who's being the irrational fucktard now?
|
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:15 PM Author: Self-absorbed coffee pot Your evidence doesn't say what you think it does. A sixfold increase in danger from one activity to another doesn't mean the new activity is very dangerous, just substantially more dangerous. Driving is a very low risk activity: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Traffic_related_deaths_-_Road_fatalities_per_vehicle-km.svg It really is still you. |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:16 PM Author: cream jet-lagged tank "It's no more dangerous than tons of innocuous shit like talking on the phone, eating, or texting while driving."
The studies show texting is significantly more dangerous than duiing, and talking on the phone.
You never had a chance ITT. Sorry you are dumb. |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:19 PM Author: Self-absorbed coffee pot LOL, did you not read what you just reposted? "It" in that sentence refers to drunk driving. You're arguing for my point in the sentence you quoted, just like your perspective in this entire subthread supports my original point (that the attention given to drunk driving is disproportionate). |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:21 PM Author: cream jet-lagged tank Yes, your arguments are about the relative dangers of one behavior vs another, NOT THE RISK OF HAVING AN ACCIDENT. The studies show that texting is the MOST DANGEROUS activity relative to things like talking and being intoxicated. You got pwned. If you want to talk about texting increasing accident rates, make another thread and stop trying to move the goal posts in this one. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528683) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:23 PM Author: Self-absorbed coffee pot My original goal post, which you so helpfully cited, was that the dangers of drunk driving are equal or less than the dangers of eating while driving, talking on the phone while driving, and texting while driving. Do you not see the irony of claiming to pwn me when you're arguing in favor of my original point? |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:24 PM Author: cream jet-lagged tank Do you not see that you have been arguing about texting while driving in this subthread??
|
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:25 PM Author: Self-absorbed coffee pot Do you not see the relationship between the secondary discussion and the original assertion? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528711) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:28 PM Author: cream jet-lagged tank Wow bro, your stupidity knows now bounds. I highlighted your original post to illustrate that your argument rests on the relative dangers of various behaviors as the reason why they shouldn't be illegal, not about the RISK of having an accident. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528737) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:35 PM Author: Self-absorbed coffee pot Date: September 8th, 2012 2:16 PM Author: ,.,...,..,.,.,:,.:,.,,,:::,..,;.,:,.,.:.:.,:.::,.
"It's no more dangerous than tons of innocuous shit like talking on the phone, eating, or texting while driving."
The studies show texting is significantly more dangerous than duiing, and talking on the phone.
You never had a chance ITT. Sorry you are dumb. --------------------------------------- Good effort, but no. You wouldn't have included that second sentence if that was actually your goal. You got confused and tried to cover for it. You also seem confused about this whole risk thing. Comparing relative risks is still a discussion of risk. I used that terminology to move the conversation away from comments like "the accident was completely avoidable had she just been PAYING ATTENTION" that are misleading about what actually happens in these cases.
|
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:39 PM Author: Hot glittery indian lodge you got destroyed in this thread brother. Your post clearly indicates you are talking about the danger of one behavior vs another. And I am also now dumber for having wasted 5 minutes of my life reading this sub-thread (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528803) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:40 PM Author: Self-absorbed coffee pot I never disputed that I was comparing risks; jesus fucking christ, where did you people get that idea? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528809) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:44 PM Author: Hot glittery indian lodge From your own posts. Relative risk =/= absolute risk. Texting is more dangerous relative to other actions while driving. That is all the justification you need to ban it. Your argument seems dumb and poorly thought out. Short of driving blind, the absolute risk of having an accident is still very small, that doesn't mean we shouldn't ban behaviors that increase the relative risk of having an accident. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528850) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:52 PM Author: Self-absorbed coffee pot Which post? My first post discusses relative risk; my second discusses absolute risk. This has always been a discussion that involves both. You'd have to support a pretty extreme police state to believe that any increase in relative risk should be banned without examining absolute risk. I don't think there's anything wrong with higher relative risk activity that doesn't cross certain absolute risk thresholds. |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:56 PM Author: Hot glittery indian lodge You'd have to be pretty dumb to think I would buy this argument. Your posts do not say what you are now claiming they do. The fact that you even tried to argue in favor of such behavior highlights your stupidity. You can have the last word, tell me to killself or whatever, but I have no desire to continue debating this issue with a stubborn douche. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528922) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:58 PM Author: Self-absorbed coffee pot I have no anger towards you. It's just a little disappointing that someone obviously more reasonable and intelligent than the other person still can't look past the trolling aspects of previous posts. What I said in my last post is what I've been arguing for all along. Do you really expect me to not be a dick towards someone who begins an interaction with "you should be gassed"? |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:04 PM Author: house-broken crimson french chef Yeah. . .gassing yerself seems the only logical conclusion to your ranting. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528514) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:05 PM Author: Self-absorbed coffee pot Did you read the post you replied to? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528518) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:06 PM Author: house-broken crimson french chef The sub-thread has gone outta control.
Whoever is the idiot that is advocating FOR DUI'ing is an idiot that should gas self. |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:15 PM Author: Self-absorbed coffee pot That subthread isn't about DUI'ing. It's about something far more dangerous - texting while driving. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528621) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 3:08 PM Author: irradiated weed whacker spot LOL sounds like your cuz got PWNd (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528991) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:03 PM Author: house-broken crimson french chef 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528509) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:01 PM Author: Garnet hell pisswyrm TCR times a billion. Exactly right (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527495) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:44 PM Author: cocky theater stage internal respiration titcr. driving cars is inherently really dangerous. women go insane when their kids die though and have lobbied for these laws. funny how theres no FADD |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:51 PM Author: zippy wonderful travel guidebook 180
|
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 10:53 AM Author: iridescent cuckoldry reminder: nutella, an ASIAN WOMAN DRIVER, brags about her DUI skills (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527100) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 10:58 AM Author: Abnormal metal shrine depressive i dont see the big deal (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527121) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 10:58 AM Author: swashbuckling autistic marketing idea school cafeteria I don't see the big deal. Most dudes I know are actually better drivers when kind of drunk because they take every precaution in the book not to get DUIpwned (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527126) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:34 AM Author: Navy Bawdyhouse this. whereas numb fucking cunts are constantly LOOKING AWAY FROM THE FUCKING ROAD to text. Id rather deal with a hammered dude STARING at the road trying to keep it together than a sober slit giving 20% attention to the fucking road sober. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527339) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:42 PM Author: swashbuckling autistic marketing idea school cafeteria Yea, I'm actually incapable of driving below the speed limit for an extended period of time unless I've had a few drinks. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527849) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:52 PM Author: orchid institution there was a bit of a controversy in Florida once when the newspaper did a story on some cop who had the highest rate of positive DUI stops in the state. She stupidly told them that the secret to her success was stopping anyone driving under the speed limit after 11pm. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527959) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:07 PM Author: house-broken crimson french chef nice moniker. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528533) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:59 PM Author: orchid institution thanks bro. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528935) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:05 PM Author: house-broken crimson french chef *applauds*
Is shitty logic like this that keeps ProsecutorBros like myself employed.
Thank you and idiots like you who think that this is actually a "good idea". |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:03 AM Author: Shimmering Elastic Band OP has the right idea, you gotta grow up. I used to DUI all the time in HS and had many close calls with police (including an accident, but it wasn't really my fault). My life would be very different now if I'd gotten a record.
Obviously driving drunk is fun as hell. If you miss the experience just try drunk bike riding and snowboarding and shit. It's still dangerous but you don't endanger other people to nearly the same extent and there's much less legal risk. |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:05 AM Author: Self-absorbed coffee pot In some states, drunk bike riding still counts as a DUI. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527165) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:30 AM Author: cream jet-lagged tank you can get a ticked for speeding on a bike in Central Park. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527303) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:42 AM Author: maroon vibrant chapel in CA biking while drunk is a crime, but not nearly as severe as a DUI. much lower fine, no license suspension, no DUI classes, etc. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527384) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:14 PM Author: lascivious lime office coldplay fan What license could they possibly even suspend?
(assuming "bike" /= motorcycle) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:54 PM Author: Self-absorbed coffee pot Your driver's license. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527986) |
|
Date: September 9th, 2012 2:04 AM Author: bipolar philosopher-king Called a 'driver license' in CA, bro. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21533822) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:00 PM Author: Anal clown I tried drunk snowboarding. Worst experience ever. Two runs and I was done. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528030) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:08 AM Author: Impressive fragrant codepig I've had a few close calls and feel like by now I've surely used up all my luck not to have experienced anything really serious. I won't do it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527186) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:32 AM Author: Navy Bawdyhouse drinking and driving isn't a game...it' a sport. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527328) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:42 AM Author: razzle-dazzle massive point puppy my friends and i used to have a saying "drunk driving isn't a choice... its a lifestyle." we were thinking about making bumper stickers. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527382) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:57 AM Author: Navy Bawdyhouse bravo! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527476) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:41 AM Author: hyperactive exhilarant stock car lodge Let it do what it do. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527378) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:41 AM Author: aqua mediation Support both driving while drunk and high. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527379) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:00 PM Author: Impressive fragrant codepig I think driving while high is a different story. It kind of makes me feel more careful. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527490) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:12 PM Author: aqua mediation Going to Sheetz or 7-11 isn't nearly as exciting when you're not blazed as shit. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527560) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:10 PM Author: brindle marvelous pervert drunk driving should be legal. there should be more severe punishments for moving violations or getting into an accident while drunk. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527546) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:16 PM Author: cream jet-lagged tank Shouldn't we be trying to prevent accidents, rather than waiting for the to occur? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527586) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:40 PM Author: cocky theater stage internal respiration allow cops to take drunks home without the criminal charge too then. I like his proposal (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527831) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:42 PM Author: cream jet-lagged tank Yeah, and also maybe make it like a moving violation, you should at least have to pay some type of penalty for a cop having to take you home. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527852) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:45 PM Author: cocky theater stage internal respiration yeah I'd be ok with that alright lets write a law review article |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:41 PM Author: cocky theater stage internal respiration I like this. I say make the penalties for the accidents the same as if the person had intentionally gotten in an accident. Impute their intent to drink to the wreck. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527840) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:53 PM Author: orchid institution yeah man, but no flame, you get situations like this:
http://www.nbcmiami.com/news/local/Man-Sentenced-for-Killing-3-Kids-in-Accident-120888284.html
unfortunately, it is very difficult to deter the behavior. |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:55 PM Author: cocky theater stage internal respiration exactly. dui laws dont prevent that. they just penalize behavior that reminds moms of that shit (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527997) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:58 PM Author: brindle marvelous pervert sounds like the system worked. i don't know the details of the previous reckless driving though. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528014) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:00 PM Author: orchid institution at the cost of three dead kids. tough stuff. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528027) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:04 PM Author: cocky theater stage internal respiration idk how the system couldve prevented this. putting him away forever makes as much sense as anything (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528058) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:05 PM Author: orchid institution yeah except that he probably got popped for DUIs but got a good lawyer and had them reduced to reckless driving. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528068) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:07 PM Author: cocky theater stage internal respiration assumes facts not in evidence (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528085) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:13 PM Author: orchid institution 20 prior tickets, prior dui.
http://www.dreamindemon.com/2009/01/26/gabriel-delrisco-shouldnt-have-been-driving/ |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:17 PM Author: cocky theater stage internal respiration so whatre you arguing for? lifetime driving ban after 1? life in jail? I dont see how any law could prevent what happened. what he did was extremely illegal as it stands. taking his license wouldnt have stopped it. have to take his freedom (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528135) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:19 PM Author: orchid institution i'm saying its a hard problem, dude. this thread reminded me of that story, which fucking sucks. the guy is a scumbag, its too bad that three kids got killed. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528146) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:21 PM Author: cocky theater stage internal respiration thats a valid observation then. reading that article it sounds like he was one of the worst drivers in history. a lot of that shit had to be alcohol related. |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:27 PM Author: orchid institution right, what's funny is that Florida has a habitual offender law that is supposed to give the state the right to take people's licenses when they get like 20 moving violations. someone fucked up badly. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528209) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:05 PM Author: Self-absorbed coffee pot We'd prevent a lot more than three dead kids if we lowered all speed limits by 5 mph. But we don't, because it's not convenient. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528062) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:06 PM Author: orchid institution does speed really matter that much? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528076) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:07 PM Author: Self-absorbed coffee pot Absolutely, both in terms of vehicle control and damage if an accident does happen. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528079) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:14 PM Author: orchid institution interesting. i speed all the time, think speed limits are flame. guess i'm wrong. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528122) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:17 PM Author: iridescent cuckoldry in germany, land of rational administration, you get punished if you get into an accident and there were texts sent from your phone just prior (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527596) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:22 PM Author: Maize indecent parlor This crime will be cuckolded by the advent of driverless automobiles. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527649) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:50 PM Author: iridescent cuckoldry i enjoyed this use of the term "cuckolded" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527944) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:45 PM Author: Electric Foreskin Random fact: I've never driven over the limit as far as I know. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527881) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:46 PM Author: swashbuckling autistic marketing idea school cafeteria How do you get home bro? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527898) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:47 PM Author: Electric Foreskin I stay home, bro. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527905) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 12:52 PM Author: swashbuckling autistic marketing idea school cafeteria Who do you hunt then? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21527966) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:14 PM Author: ebony nudist theatre https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvTObqF3OD0
/thread |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:23 PM Author: Anal clown Too lazy to copypaste (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528181) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:25 PM Author: obsidian cracking stag film old irish cottage (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528191) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:35 PM Author: brindle marvelous pervert the idea of getting caught or the idea of getting into an accident? the idea of getting caught scares me. the idea of getting into an accident doesn't phase me a bit. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528281) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:36 PM Author: orchid institution idea of possibly killing someone doesn't phase you? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528287) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:37 PM Author: swashbuckling autistic marketing idea school cafeteria Why would it? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528297) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:38 PM Author: orchid institution just do sociopath, bro. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528308) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:40 PM Author: swashbuckling autistic marketing idea school cafeteria No I mean, every time you get into a car and drive somewhere you could possibly kill someone. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528335) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:41 PM Author: orchid institution good understanding of probabilities, bro. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528343) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:44 PM Author: swashbuckling autistic marketing idea school cafeteria It's pretty much 0 either way unless I'm totally shitfaced (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528362) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:45 PM Author: cream jet-lagged tank do you drive totally shitfaced? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528370) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:46 PM Author: swashbuckling autistic marketing idea school cafeteria No, but I do over .08 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528374) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:16 PM Author: house-broken crimson french chef tcr (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528638) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:39 PM Author: obsidian cracking stag film old irish cottage (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528325) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:40 PM Author: swashbuckling autistic marketing idea school cafeteria Scared of getting caught (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528338) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:39 PM Author: cream jet-lagged tank Edgy and cool. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528326) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:44 PM Author: brindle marvelous pervert no more so than the idea of getting into a crash while sober. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528363) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:45 PM Author: swashbuckling autistic marketing idea school cafeteria If not for the whole legal aspect, I would much rather be wasted if I'm going to get in a wreck. It would be scary as hell sober and prob hurt more (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528369) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 1:49 PM Author: brindle marvelous pervert yeah, i used to tense up a bit when engaging in a slightly risky passing maneuver or if another car surprised me with a sudden swerve. now i've trained myself to relax and loosen my body instead. it's safer if i get into an accident and allows better decision making under stressful circumstances as well. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528406) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:08 PM Author: Titillating idiotic striped hyena potus (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528537) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:18 PM Author: razzle-dazzle massive point puppy my bros in hs used to do this all the time. nbd. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528648) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:37 PM Author: Hot glittery indian lodge (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528788) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 2:54 PM Author: deranged main people it is trashy, unprestigious behavior. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21528911) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2012 11:55 PM Author: zippy wonderful travel guidebook the only time i worry about it is when it's a high risk period e.g. the bars just got out thr/fri/sat; after a huge sporting event, etc. otherwise, game on.
i'm safer on the road after 12 beers than the 96 IQ woman with three screaming brats eating taco bell and talking on the phone to her best girlfriend driving around her baby daddy dodge durango. that's a fucking fact. she's on the road legally, i'm not, but there's no moral issue involved - purely statutory due to an intense retard prohibition organization that has become so extreme the founder disassociated with the entire enterprise.
non-DUI trolls are beta faggots who don't know how to drive or drink. i fully advocate that those people shouldn't be able to get behind the wheel after their requisite TWO appletinis. faggots. |
|
Date: September 9th, 2012 12:02 AM Author: vivacious pale fat ankles cr, faggot. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21533086) |
|
Date: September 9th, 2012 12:03 AM Author: crawly bateful national doctorate (alpha pumo faggot who can also curl 235 with his 8" cock) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21533097) |
|
Date: September 9th, 2012 9:22 AM Author: mewling abode roommate feels good man (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#21534497) |
|
Date: April 25th, 2015 3:46 PM Author: insane aromatic dog poop (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2046360&forum_id=2#27758411) |