The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Who was the Cadwalader lawyer who made the shitty argument?
| arrogant digit ratio | 10/30/13 |
| arrogant digit ratio | 10/30/13 |
| arrogant digit ratio | 10/30/13 |
| arrogant digit ratio | 10/31/13 |
| boyish pale chapel potus | 10/31/13 |
| arrogant digit ratio | 10/31/13 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: October 30th, 2013 7:58 PM Author: arrogant digit ratio "Cadwalader's frivolous interpretation, though exposed in the insurance companies' brief, is repeated in Mead Johnson's reply brief and was defended by Cadwalader's lawyer for Mead at the oral argument. That a major law firm would engage in such shenanigans distresses us. The firm's argument regarding the amendment to the National Union insurance policy is censurable, and we hereby censure it."
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-ca7-13-01526/pdf/USCOURTS-ca7-13-01526-0.pdf
|
Date: October 30th, 2013 8:11 PM Author: arrogant digit ratio According to the beginning of oral argument, http://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/sound/2013/sk.12-3478.12-3478_09_24_2013.mp3 , it sounds like it was Hal Shaftel.
http://www.cadwalader.com/professionals/hal-shaftel |
|
Date: October 30th, 2013 8:15 PM Author: arrogant digit ratio http://www.cadwalader.com/uploads/attorney_photo/Shaftel.H_72dpi_.jpg (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2400983&forum_id=2#24337544) |
|
Date: October 31st, 2013 2:28 PM Author: arrogant digit ratio "is CADWALADER NY really that bad?"
http://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=2150062&mc=9&forum_id=2 |
|
Date: October 31st, 2013 2:36 PM Author: boyish pale chapel potus tldr/
what was the frivolousness?
|
 |
Date: October 31st, 2013 3:33 PM Author: arrogant digit ratio Misrepresented the title of a document that amended a provision that wasn't at issue and claimed that they win.
Listen to the first minute of the oral argument link I posted. The judges were having none of Hal's shit. |