The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
COMES NOW PLAINTIFF . . .
Poast new message in this thread
Date: March 6th, 2014 5:58 PM Author: arousing dead whorehouse Do any of you idiots start your motions like that? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25143047) |
Date: March 6th, 2014 5:58 PM Author: boyish area dopamine I have to. Shitlaw firm. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25143051) |
 |
Date: March 6th, 2014 6:07 PM Author: arousing dead whorehouse Why would you do that?
Do you feel dirty? |
|
Date: March 6th, 2014 7:16 PM Author: boyish area dopamine I gave up a long time ago trying to civilize the idiots at this firm. If I ever change any of their shitlaw language they immediately are like "where's the COMES NOW?" and "not enough thereafters, whereafters, etc." They ruin every brief with that shitlaw garbage. It's like they can't handle just a nice simple brief. Gotta muck it up. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25143522) |
|
Date: March 6th, 2014 7:19 PM Author: rough-skinned locale multi-billionaire (brian garner) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25143542) |
|
Date: March 6th, 2014 7:20 PM Author: boyish area dopamine I enjoy some of his work but he's dead wrong about footnote citations. That would be garbage. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25143546) |
|
Date: March 6th, 2014 7:22 PM Author: rough-skinned locale multi-billionaire i think he's 100% right about that. nothing more distracting than a stringcite. and it's hard to tell where sentences begin with parentheticals. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25143555) |
|
Date: March 6th, 2014 7:30 PM Author: boyish area dopamine stringcites are not at all distracting. anyone who reads a lot of briefs knows instinctively when to glance & skip over string cites and when it might be useful. what WOULD be distracting is having to fucking look down at the bottom of the page to look at a footnote just to see whether there's anything except a cite, and to see what is cited, etc. it would ruin the whole flow of reading. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25143612) |
|
Date: March 6th, 2014 9:28 PM Author: rough-skinned locale multi-billionaire text shouldn't be in footnotes. garner said it's shitty writing to put substantive text in footnotes. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25144324) |
|
Date: March 6th, 2014 9:32 PM Author: boyish area dopamine the cites themselves can often be important. in general i think anyone who is inquisitive is going to want to look down to see what is in the footnote. that's my point. having to look to a separate part of the page is more distracting than having to skip over a cite. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25144362) |
|
Date: March 6th, 2014 9:46 PM Author: lavender bearded stage french chef This. In most situations, especially at the trial court leave , the cite following a sentence is often more important than the sentence itself. Forcing the reader to go to the bottom of the page would be bad form. |
|
Date: March 6th, 2014 7:31 PM Author: arousing dead whorehouse His footnote recommendation is inconsistent with the trend of old judges reading briefs on screens. They usually don't use a full-page view. They scroll down continuously. Footnotes are either a pain in the ass or they're ignored. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25143615) |
|
Date: March 6th, 2014 9:29 PM Author: rough-skinned locale multi-billionaire they should be ignored. if it's important enough, put it in the body. a footnote should be there for backup only. there's no reason a reporter cite needs to be in the main line. and case names are only important for cases that people know. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25144331) |
|
Date: March 6th, 2014 9:30 PM Author: arousing dead whorehouse You just said that's banned.
WTF sort of nonsense are you spewing? |
|
Date: March 6th, 2014 9:31 PM Author: rough-skinned locale multi-billionaire banned? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25144354) |
|
Date: March 6th, 2014 9:31 PM Author: arousing dead whorehouse You: "i think he's 100% right about that." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25144360) |
|
Date: March 6th, 2014 9:34 PM Author: rough-skinned locale multi-billionaire huh? what're you saying. i agree with garner that citations should be in footnotes and anything important enough in the citation should be placed in a textual sentence. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25144390) |
|
Date: March 6th, 2014 9:36 PM Author: arousing dead whorehouse You edited. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25144404) |
|
Date: March 6th, 2014 9:51 PM Author: lavender bearded stage french chef This is the opinion of someone who is either too in love with their own writing or doesn't know a god damn thing about practicing law. Here's a hint: trial court judges don't give a fuck about what you have to say about the law. They care what the court of appeals will do and that's it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25144573) |
|
Date: March 7th, 2014 5:31 AM Author: Laughsome Painfully Honest Jew what? he's exactly right.
it's much better to say "x informed y and thus y avoids liability; in smith mr z avoided the sec (1), in johnson mr. d avoided conviction (2), and likewise in gomez mr. f escaped waiving privilege (3)."
that's far better than stringcites, and only eschewed if your argument is sps. |
|
Date: March 24th, 2015 8:41 PM Author: Erotic idea he suggested Except in your shitty footnote style the judge doesn't know whether those three cases were decided by the dumbfuck magistrate in Shitsville or SCOTUS, unless he looks at the footnote. He doesn't know if they were recent cases or from the 1920s. He doesn't know if they're published or not, and thus precedential or not. And trying to cram all that info into the text is ridiculous. Citation formats exist precisely because they can convey a large amount of information in a succinct way. To hide that from the decisionmaker (unless he is willing to break reading to scroll down) is terrible form and preferred mostly by academics who care more about what they have to say than what any authority says. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#27549223) |
|
Date: March 6th, 2014 6:13 PM Author: arousing dead whorehouse Is it "by and through undersigned counsel"?
|
|
Date: March 6th, 2014 6:15 PM Author: rough-skinned locale multi-billionaire is it before "this Honorable Court"? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25143161) |
|
Date: March 6th, 2014 6:45 PM Author: arousing dead whorehouse Likely. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25143331) |
|
Date: March 6th, 2014 6:15 PM Author: Erotic idea he suggested COMES NOW THE DEFENDANT, Big Bank MegaCorp Conglomerate LLC (hereinafter "Big Bank" or "Defendant") and files this, it's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Plaintiff's TILA Section 1463(a)(4) Claims, and would show the Court as follows. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25143167) |
|
Date: March 6th, 2014 6:16 PM Author: rough-skinned locale multi-billionaire 180 use of "it's" if intentional (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25143173) |
|
Date: March 6th, 2014 6:17 PM Author: arousing dead whorehouse This is gonna be good. I'm already excited. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25143182) |
|
Date: March 6th, 2014 6:22 PM Author: irradiated address digit ratio WHEREAS, NOW THEREFORE (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25143205) |
|
Date: March 6th, 2014 6:23 PM Author: arousing dead whorehouse I'd RESPECTFULLY SUBMIT that. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25143211) |
|
Date: March 6th, 2014 6:52 PM Author: Fragrant Flesh Legal Warrant COMES NOW THE STATE OF (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25143377) |
|
Date: March 6th, 2014 9:29 PM Author: tantric church building (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25144333) |
|
Date: March 6th, 2014 6:53 PM Author: razzle turdskin Once or twice a year some tool starts off with, "May it please the court . . . ". Stop being a douche and just say, "Good morning, your Honor," FFS. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25143381) |
|
Date: March 6th, 2014 6:55 PM Author: rough-skinned locale multi-billionaire pretty much every appellate argument begins that way. it's fine for appeals. not some shitty motion. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25143397) |
|
Date: March 6th, 2014 9:37 PM Author: at-the-ready talented base national security agency cr. For appeals, it's tradition and isn't really subject to debate. If someone starts an argument that way on a motion before a trial court, they are a massive, massive tool. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25144412) |
|
Date: March 6th, 2014 7:12 PM Author: Light curious selfie "Plaintiff hereby prays for any additional relief this Court deems just and appropriate." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25143506) |
|
Date: March 6th, 2014 7:34 PM Author: red supple mental disorder kitty P E R S O N S:
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that defendant BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., by and through the undersigned, being counsel of record for the above-named party, will move this Honorable Court for an Order to Show Cause . . . |
|
Date: March 6th, 2014 9:27 PM Author: boyish area dopamine devastating. legal profession is done here. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25144312) |
|
Date: March 6th, 2014 9:38 PM Author: at-the-ready talented base national security agency for me, this always invokes an image of the party literally ejaculating. Like you are announcing to the court that you are cumming, oh and and on another note you are also submitting this motion. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25144428) |
|
Date: March 6th, 2014 9:39 PM Author: boyish area dopamine porn and its consequences (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25144439) |
|
Date: March 7th, 2014 3:28 AM Author: arousing dead whorehouse http://i.imgur.com/Zl3aXh6.gif (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25146232) |
|
Date: April 24th, 2014 10:08 AM Author: big free-loading sweet tailpipe (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25437636) |
|
Date: April 24th, 2014 9:20 AM Author: bateful associate tanning salon (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25437433) |
|
Date: March 24th, 2015 8:32 PM Author: rough-skinned locale multi-billionaire (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#27549159) |