\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

COMES NOW PLAINTIFF . . .

Do any of you idiots start your motions like that?
Rough-skinned masturbator
  03/06/14
I have to. Shitlaw firm.
Misunderstood idiot dog poop
  03/06/14
Why would you do that? Do you feel dirty?
Rough-skinned masturbator
  03/06/14
I gave up a long time ago trying to civilize the idiots at t...
Misunderstood idiot dog poop
  03/06/14
(brian garner)
Lascivious blathering cruise ship
  03/06/14
I enjoy some of his work but he's dead wrong about footnote ...
Misunderstood idiot dog poop
  03/06/14
i think he's 100% right about that. nothing more distracting...
Lascivious blathering cruise ship
  03/06/14
stringcites are not at all distracting. anyone who reads a l...
Misunderstood idiot dog poop
  03/06/14
text shouldn't be in footnotes. garner said it's shitty writ...
Lascivious blathering cruise ship
  03/06/14
the cites themselves can often be important. in general i th...
Misunderstood idiot dog poop
  03/06/14
This. In most situations, especially at the trial court leav...
Cobalt Patrolman Halford
  03/06/14
His footnote recommendation is inconsistent with the trend o...
Rough-skinned masturbator
  03/06/14
they should be ignored. if it's important enough, put it in ...
Lascivious blathering cruise ship
  03/06/14
You just said that's banned. WTF sort of nonsense are you...
Rough-skinned masturbator
  03/06/14
banned?
Lascivious blathering cruise ship
  03/06/14
You: "i think he's 100% right about that."
Rough-skinned masturbator
  03/06/14
huh? what're you saying. i agree with garner that citations ...
Lascivious blathering cruise ship
  03/06/14
You edited.
Rough-skinned masturbator
  03/06/14
This is the opinion of someone who is either too in love wit...
Cobalt Patrolman Halford
  03/06/14
what? he's exactly right. it's much better to say "x...
stirring senate striped hyena
  03/07/14
Except in your shitty footnote style the judge doesn't know ...
learning disabled rose potus
  03/24/15
Is it "by and through undersigned counsel"?
Rough-skinned masturbator
  03/06/14
is it before "this Honorable Court"?
Lascivious blathering cruise ship
  03/06/14
Likely.
Rough-skinned masturbator
  03/06/14
COMES NOW THE DEFENDANT, Big Bank MegaCorp Conglomerate LLC ...
learning disabled rose potus
  03/06/14
180 use of "it's" if intentional
Lascivious blathering cruise ship
  03/06/14
This is gonna be good. I'm already excited.
Rough-skinned masturbator
  03/06/14
WHEREAS, NOW THEREFORE
sepia hideous church
  03/06/14
I'd RESPECTFULLY SUBMIT that.
Rough-skinned masturbator
  03/06/14
COMES NOW THE STATE OF
Startled know-it-all doctorate faggotry
  03/06/14
...
filthy black rehab quadroon
  03/06/14
Once or twice a year some tool starts off with, "May it...
Judgmental indigo fanboi milk
  03/06/14
pretty much every appellate argument begins that way. it's f...
Lascivious blathering cruise ship
  03/06/14
cr. For appeals, it's tradition and isn't really subject to ...
racy ultramarine turdskin set
  03/06/14
"Plaintiff hereby prays for any additional relief this ...
charismatic maniacal chapel mexican
  03/06/14
P E R S O N S: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that defendant BANK OF ...
Maize crackhouse sound barrier
  03/06/14
devastating. legal profession is done here.
Misunderstood idiot dog poop
  03/06/14
for me, this always invokes an image of the party literally ...
racy ultramarine turdskin set
  03/06/14
porn and its consequences
Misunderstood idiot dog poop
  03/06/14
http://i.imgur.com/Zl3aXh6.gif
Rough-skinned masturbator
  03/07/14
...
fighting therapy
  04/24/14
...
brindle locale
  04/24/14
...
Lascivious blathering cruise ship
  03/24/15


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: March 6th, 2014 5:58 PM
Author: Rough-skinned masturbator

Do any of you idiots start your motions like that?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25143047)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 6th, 2014 5:58 PM
Author: Misunderstood idiot dog poop

I have to. Shitlaw firm.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25143051)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 6th, 2014 6:07 PM
Author: Rough-skinned masturbator

Why would you do that?

Do you feel dirty?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25143111)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 6th, 2014 7:16 PM
Author: Misunderstood idiot dog poop

I gave up a long time ago trying to civilize the idiots at this firm. If I ever change any of their shitlaw language they immediately are like "where's the COMES NOW?" and "not enough thereafters, whereafters, etc." They ruin every brief with that shitlaw garbage. It's like they can't handle just a nice simple brief. Gotta muck it up.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25143522)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 6th, 2014 7:19 PM
Author: Lascivious blathering cruise ship

(brian garner)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25143542)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 6th, 2014 7:20 PM
Author: Misunderstood idiot dog poop

I enjoy some of his work but he's dead wrong about footnote citations. That would be garbage.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25143546)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 6th, 2014 7:22 PM
Author: Lascivious blathering cruise ship

i think he's 100% right about that. nothing more distracting than a stringcite. and it's hard to tell where sentences begin with parentheticals.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25143555)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 6th, 2014 7:30 PM
Author: Misunderstood idiot dog poop

stringcites are not at all distracting. anyone who reads a lot of briefs knows instinctively when to glance & skip over string cites and when it might be useful. what WOULD be distracting is having to fucking look down at the bottom of the page to look at a footnote just to see whether there's anything except a cite, and to see what is cited, etc. it would ruin the whole flow of reading.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25143612)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 6th, 2014 9:28 PM
Author: Lascivious blathering cruise ship

text shouldn't be in footnotes. garner said it's shitty writing to put substantive text in footnotes.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25144324)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 6th, 2014 9:32 PM
Author: Misunderstood idiot dog poop

the cites themselves can often be important. in general i think anyone who is inquisitive is going to want to look down to see what is in the footnote. that's my point. having to look to a separate part of the page is more distracting than having to skip over a cite.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25144362)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 6th, 2014 9:46 PM
Author: Cobalt Patrolman Halford

This. In most situations, especially at the trial court leave

, the cite following a sentence is often more important than the sentence itself. Forcing the reader to go to the bottom of the page would be bad form.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25144532)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 6th, 2014 7:31 PM
Author: Rough-skinned masturbator

His footnote recommendation is inconsistent with the trend of old judges reading briefs on screens. They usually don't use a full-page view. They scroll down continuously. Footnotes are either a pain in the ass or they're ignored.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25143615)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 6th, 2014 9:29 PM
Author: Lascivious blathering cruise ship

they should be ignored. if it's important enough, put it in the body. a footnote should be there for backup only. there's no reason a reporter cite needs to be in the main line. and case names are only important for cases that people know.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25144331)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 6th, 2014 9:30 PM
Author: Rough-skinned masturbator

You just said that's banned.

WTF sort of nonsense are you spewing?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25144345)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 6th, 2014 9:31 PM
Author: Lascivious blathering cruise ship

banned?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25144354)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 6th, 2014 9:31 PM
Author: Rough-skinned masturbator

You: "i think he's 100% right about that."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25144360)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 6th, 2014 9:34 PM
Author: Lascivious blathering cruise ship

huh? what're you saying. i agree with garner that citations should be in footnotes and anything important enough in the citation should be placed in a textual sentence.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25144390)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 6th, 2014 9:36 PM
Author: Rough-skinned masturbator

You edited.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25144404)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 6th, 2014 9:51 PM
Author: Cobalt Patrolman Halford

This is the opinion of someone who is either too in love with their own writing or doesn't know a god damn thing about practicing law. Here's a hint: trial court judges don't give a fuck about what you have to say about the law. They care what the court of appeals will do and that's it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25144573)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 7th, 2014 5:31 AM
Author: stirring senate striped hyena

what? he's exactly right.

it's much better to say "x informed y and thus y avoids liability; in smith mr z avoided the sec (1), in johnson mr. d avoided conviction (2), and likewise in gomez mr. f escaped waiving privilege (3)."

that's far better than stringcites, and only eschewed if your argument is sps.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25146328)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 24th, 2015 8:41 PM
Author: learning disabled rose potus

Except in your shitty footnote style the judge doesn't know whether those three cases were decided by the dumbfuck magistrate in Shitsville or SCOTUS, unless he looks at the footnote. He doesn't know if they were recent cases or from the 1920s. He doesn't know if they're published or not, and thus precedential or not. And trying to cram all that info into the text is ridiculous. Citation formats exist precisely because they can convey a large amount of information in a succinct way. To hide that from the decisionmaker (unless he is willing to break reading to scroll down) is terrible form and preferred mostly by academics who care more about what they have to say than what any authority says.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#27549223)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 6th, 2014 6:13 PM
Author: Rough-skinned masturbator

Is it "by and through undersigned counsel"?



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25143148)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 6th, 2014 6:15 PM
Author: Lascivious blathering cruise ship

is it before "this Honorable Court"?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25143161)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 6th, 2014 6:45 PM
Author: Rough-skinned masturbator

Likely.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25143331)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 6th, 2014 6:15 PM
Author: learning disabled rose potus

COMES NOW THE DEFENDANT, Big Bank MegaCorp Conglomerate LLC (hereinafter "Big Bank" or "Defendant") and files this, it's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Plaintiff's TILA Section 1463(a)(4) Claims, and would show the Court as follows.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25143167)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 6th, 2014 6:16 PM
Author: Lascivious blathering cruise ship

180 use of "it's" if intentional

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25143173)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 6th, 2014 6:17 PM
Author: Rough-skinned masturbator

This is gonna be good. I'm already excited.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25143182)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 6th, 2014 6:22 PM
Author: sepia hideous church

WHEREAS, NOW THEREFORE

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25143205)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 6th, 2014 6:23 PM
Author: Rough-skinned masturbator

I'd RESPECTFULLY SUBMIT that.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25143211)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 6th, 2014 6:52 PM
Author: Startled know-it-all doctorate faggotry

COMES NOW THE STATE OF

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25143377)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 6th, 2014 9:29 PM
Author: filthy black rehab quadroon



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25144333)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 6th, 2014 6:53 PM
Author: Judgmental indigo fanboi milk

Once or twice a year some tool starts off with, "May it please the court . . . ". Stop being a douche and just say, "Good morning, your Honor," FFS.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25143381)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 6th, 2014 6:55 PM
Author: Lascivious blathering cruise ship

pretty much every appellate argument begins that way. it's fine for appeals. not some shitty motion.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25143397)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 6th, 2014 9:37 PM
Author: racy ultramarine turdskin set

cr. For appeals, it's tradition and isn't really subject to debate. If someone starts an argument that way on a motion before a trial court, they are a massive, massive tool.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25144412)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 6th, 2014 7:12 PM
Author: charismatic maniacal chapel mexican

"Plaintiff hereby prays for any additional relief this Court deems just and appropriate."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25143506)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 6th, 2014 7:34 PM
Author: Maize crackhouse sound barrier

P E R S O N S:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that defendant BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., by and through the undersigned, being counsel of record for the above-named party, will move this Honorable Court for an Order to Show Cause . . .

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25143628)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 6th, 2014 9:27 PM
Author: Misunderstood idiot dog poop

devastating. legal profession is done here.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25144312)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 6th, 2014 9:38 PM
Author: racy ultramarine turdskin set

for me, this always invokes an image of the party literally ejaculating. Like you are announcing to the court that you are cumming, oh and and on another note you are also submitting this motion.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25144428)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 6th, 2014 9:39 PM
Author: Misunderstood idiot dog poop

porn and its consequences

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25144439)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 7th, 2014 3:28 AM
Author: Rough-skinned masturbator

http://i.imgur.com/Zl3aXh6.gif

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25146232)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 24th, 2014 10:08 AM
Author: fighting therapy



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25437636)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 24th, 2014 9:20 AM
Author: brindle locale



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#25437433)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 24th, 2015 8:32 PM
Author: Lascivious blathering cruise ship



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2511484&forum_id=2#27549159)