The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
The FEDS are neutral, they don't judge you (jack frost)
| vivacious center | 04/15/14 |
| flickering theater stage | 04/15/14 |
| vivacious center | 04/15/14 |
| flickering theater stage | 04/15/14 |
| vivacious center | 04/15/14 |
| flickering theater stage | 04/15/14 |
| vivacious center | 04/15/14 |
| Primrose faggotry | 04/15/14 |
| vivacious center | 04/15/14 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: April 15th, 2014 1:19 PM Author: vivacious center Thanks for the lulz, jackass! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2543990&forum_id=2#25387009) |
Date: April 15th, 2014 1:20 PM Author: flickering theater stage I wasn't talking about the federal government, I was talking about the idea of a neutral government. In our case the federal government does make all sorts of judgements about how we live our private lives, but it is still less judgmental than the social institutions that conservatives would like to see take over its role. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2543990&forum_id=2#25387016) |
 |
Date: April 15th, 2014 1:24 PM Author: vivacious center Please cite some examples (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2543990&forum_id=2#25387033) |
|
Date: April 15th, 2014 1:28 PM Author: flickering theater stage The example of the family is perfect. If you are financially dependent on your familial relationships and will face true destitution if you want to leave your spouse or offend their parents then you are not as "free" as you would be in a situation where that isn't the case. Or maybe you want to be gay but know that all the heavily Christian employers in your area will refuse to hire you-the state corrects for this by controlling business relationships and making discrimination impossible, which makes it easier for each individual person to live as they see fit in their private life. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2543990&forum_id=2#25387049) |
|
Date: April 15th, 2014 1:29 PM Author: vivacious center However, the state will judge you for not liking gays because of your belief system. So now you are just as un-free. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2543990&forum_id=2#25387057) |
|
Date: April 15th, 2014 1:33 PM Author: flickering theater stage You would still be free to dislike gays in your private life though, and I think that is a relevant point. When the state forces neutrality in the economy it greatly increases the personal liberty of the average person by making it impossible for private beliefs about how people live to be used to threaten them with economic ruin.
I supported Eich being forced out of Mozilla because we live in a world in which workers have few protections, gays can't marry, and conservatives are using private means to advance their cause. That is also how we had to fight virulent racism in the 60s. That doesn't mean that is the best way to handle this sort of thing though. In my ideal society it would be legally impossible to fire anyone personal behavior or views, and such behavior couldn't become truly political because campaign contributions would be limited. |
|
Date: April 15th, 2014 1:36 PM Author: vivacious center Sorry bro, I just remembered that tussling with idiots isn't good for you. Take care. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2543990&forum_id=2#25387089) |
|
Date: April 15th, 2014 1:43 PM Author: Primrose faggotry I'm financially dependent on my familial relationships! SAVE ME GOVERNMENT! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2543990&forum_id=2#25387120) |
|
Date: April 15th, 2014 1:44 PM Author: vivacious center "Don't worry, we won't judge you! Please BE and DO whatever you PLEASE!!!" -Government (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2543990&forum_id=2#25387123) |