The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Answer these 2 questions from pre-1991 LSAT
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 4th, 2014 10:55 PM Author: pearly gaming laptop library Passage and Question #62 http://i.imgur.com/VeAS0rx.png
Question #61
Note: I will post the answers after a few of you have posted your reponses. This section was called "Best Argument" section that was administered during the early 80s and 70s. |
Date: June 4th, 2014 10:56 PM Author: pearly gaming laptop library (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689521) |
 |
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:06 PM Author: Maniacal Halford Ceo 62-1
61-3
these didnt seem very hard |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:09 PM Author: Curious hominid main people I got the same for 61 but how'd you get the answer for 62? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689669) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:13 PM Author: Maniacal Halford Ceo bond did what goodfellow wanted him to do. can't hold a nigga at fault for dat. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689708) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:14 PM Author: Curious hominid main people how is 2 not the credited response? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689723) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:19 PM Author: Maniacal Halford Ceo irrelevant. how is it bonds fault he risked his whole position on it anyway. Even if bond DID know he was going to risk the whole position on it, he would have been giving him advice he believed to be good.
I could be wrong here bro, but tahts the way i see it. |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:25 PM Author: Federal Duck-like Personal Credit Line its not his job to safeguard his interests. he wanted investment advice, he got it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689842) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:26 PM Author: Maniacal Halford Ceo yny (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689849) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:32 PM Author: Federal Duck-like Personal Credit Line 61 is a shit question.
3 is only sort of true because he heard offhand from a famous financier and then said "it's the best stock I know, I heard it from a reliable source". so yeah the source is arguably reliable but he makes it sound like he did research instead of just randomly hearing it.
...but it's still the best answer. 4 (like some people are saying) isn't true because it's not his job to tell him how much to invest. Goodfellow just wanted to know what to invest in, and Bond (to the best of his knowledge) gave him this. |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:33 PM Author: Maniacal Halford Ceo yea bro seems like a clear case of misrepresentation (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689897) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:35 PM Author: Federal Duck-like Personal Credit Line it's still a shit question though. it would be more clear if he like...heard off-hand from a friend who claimed to know about stocks and then was like "oh it was a reliable source". A famous financier I would think is somewhat reliable but....not as reliable as he painted it out to be. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689910) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:40 PM Author: Maniacal Halford Ceo yea then it would be an easy question (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689947) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:32 PM Author: Deep House Weed Whacker it's because it doesn't matter that he is a friend he is a broker that's why #4 is the answer |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:35 PM Author: Maniacal Halford Ceo no. If 4 is true here, then 4 would also be true if bond had given him advice he knew to be sps. Bond's DID have an OBLIGATION to give him investment advice, which he did to the best of his ability. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689904) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:38 PM Author: Deep House Weed Whacker no dipshit because then you would have a different reason. be sure we are talking about the same question |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:40 PM Author: Curious hominid main people lol you sound dumb (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689942) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:42 PM Author: Deep House Weed Whacker what supports the accusation one in good faith, one not yeah, no difference there |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:40 PM Author: Maniacal Halford Ceo he FULFILLED his OBLIGATION. 4 is irrelevant because it has nothing to do w bond's obligation (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689944) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:42 PM Author: burgundy bull headed location (Guy who doesn't realize that stockbrokers should be held to a higher standard than retards when giving investment advice) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689961) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:45 PM Author: Maniacal Halford Ceo 1. this is not a series 7.
2. goodfellow is an old friend and bond is not acting as fiduciary |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:47 PM Author: burgundy bull headed location (Guy who didn't read the instructions or thinks a lay person would know or care what a fiduciary is) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25690002) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:49 PM Author: Maniacal Halford Ceo u just stated the concept of fiduciary duty u dumb asshole.
and if someone doesn't care they wouldnt care that hes a stockbroker. |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:50 PM Author: burgundy bull headed location (Guy who enjoyed the shit out of dat WUSTL) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25690037) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:52 PM Author: Maniacal Halford Ceo never made it past the 16th grade, bruh (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25690051) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:57 PM Author: Maniacal Halford Ceo also, LOL @ u reading the instructions... just lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25690099) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:58 PM Author: burgundy bull headed location (Guy who is not a biglawyer) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25690109) |
|
Date: July 3rd, 2014 11:57 PM Author: misanthropic liquid oxygen What's a fiduciary? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25867558) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:00 PM Author: pearly gaming laptop library (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689566) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:02 PM Author: Judgmental swashbuckling hissy fit the first one - is the answer 1? these are fucked (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689591) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:04 PM Author: pearly gaming laptop library They aren't fucked. See http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED469242.pdf (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689616) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:03 PM Author: Thriller chocolate internal respiration love of her life omg i looked at that and couldn't even think about summoning the will to read it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689610) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:04 PM Author: pearly gaming laptop library are you stupid? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689618) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:04 PM Author: fantasy-prone theater stage 2 is 3? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689615) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:05 PM Author: pearly gaming laptop library The answer for #62 is not 3 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689625) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:05 PM Author: fantasy-prone theater stage I mean 61 the 2nd Q didn't look at the #s at first (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689633) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:08 PM Author: Outnumbered spot Speculator assumes responsibility --> not bond's fault (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689660) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:13 PM Author: pearly gaming laptop library ? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689712) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:15 PM Author: Outnumbered spot I'm saying 62 is 4 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689726) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:16 PM Author: Twinkling Cerebral School Clown (guy who scored 155 on the actual LSAT) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689735) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:17 PM Author: Outnumbered spot 177 actually. But could be wrong here (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689747) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:17 PM Author: Twinkling Cerebral School Clown lol you did NOT score a 177 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689756) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:18 PM Author: Outnumbered spot Afraid so. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689765) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:33 PM Author: burgundy bull headed location Titcr (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689899) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:11 PM Author: Outnumbered spot 61 has got to be 3 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689697) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:21 PM Author: Maniacal Halford Ceo what are the answers (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689805) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:21 PM Author: startled queen of the night pretty easy. 61 is 3 and 62 is 1. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689806) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:22 PM Author: Maniacal Halford Ceo did you take a real lsat? score? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689810) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:22 PM Author: startled queen of the night how the christ did you respond to me so fast, kike? i edited bc i didnt realize they were pastedout of order (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689817) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:26 PM Author: Maniacal Halford Ceo prob clicked link right as u edited? I'm asking because im about to start studying for lsat and i got the same answers.
you seem paranoid as fuck bro |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:29 PM Author: startled queen of the night did you get the same answers as my pre-edit or post-edit? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689863) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:29 PM Author: Maniacal Halford Ceo post i posted them like 5 minutes ago up top (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689870) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:24 PM Author: startled queen of the night i would have totally missed these questions when i was first studying for the lsat. but after 7 years of scholarly RIGOR impsoed on my by law school and DAT biglaw these were easy as fuck to hone in on. you can immediately discard the irrelevant answers. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689828) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:34 PM Author: Twinkling Cerebral School Clown how did LS and BIGLAW make you see the irrelevant answers (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689903) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:25 PM Author: passionate massive temple giraffe what do these questions even mean seem stupid |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:27 PM Author: Maniacal Halford Ceo (dumb) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689850) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:28 PM Author: passionate massive temple giraffe good luck sinking 150k into LS, smart ass (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689862) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:30 PM Author: Twinkling Cerebral School Clown (low IQ'd faggot MAF he can't understand standardized tests) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689871) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:31 PM Author: passionate massive temple giraffe i get the answers, i just think it's kind of moronic. re: 61-3, who's to say he's misrepresenting anything? to him, the financier was a reliable source |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:32 PM Author: Maniacal Halford Ceo math is dumb (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689888) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:42 PM Author: Carmine plaza math? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689967) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:30 PM Author: Maniacal Halford Ceo DAT gi-bill (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689874) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:33 PM Author: Flesh Mind-boggling Piazza Is Ted Cruz posting on two or three different pumos ITT? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689892) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:34 PM Author: Boyish azn senate Three (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689900) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:41 PM Author: Flesh Mind-boggling Piazza Ty (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689957) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:43 PM Author: Floppy Indirect Expression Garrison (ted cruz tp) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689974) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:34 PM Author: Hateful laughsome theatre 62 = 1, obv (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689902) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:36 PM Author: Maniacal Halford Ceo LSAT? you went to H, right? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689911) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:36 PM Author: Hateful laughsome theatre 174 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689915) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:46 PM Author: burgundy bull headed location It's 4 dog. It would be 1 if Bond wasn't a stockbroker. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689995) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:35 PM Author: Hateful laughsome theatre 61 =3 obv
what's difficult, seriously? |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:45 PM Author: Electric adulterous nowag friendly grandma ya srsly, these qs are likely easier than actual LSAT (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689986) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:45 PM Author: Deep House Weed Whacker how does his advice misrepresent his knowledge of the situation? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25689989) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:47 PM Author: Electric adulterous nowag friendly grandma he made a recommendation as a stock broker without presumably doing any due diligence into his recommendation. it is assumed stock brokers when offering advice are offering informed opinions. this situation is analogous to a lawyer that offers legal advice without performing due diligence and then fucks over a dude that follows bad advice (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25690005) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:49 PM Author: Deep House Weed Whacker famous financiers don't become famous by being wrong 'that I know of' was technically correct he just should have warned him not to go too crazy investing in it |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:49 PM Author: passionate massive temple giraffe i guess it's the 'best' answer, but it's pretty vague and shitty how is a nonlawyer taking the LSAT supposed to know anything about 'due diligence'? the broker clearly had no mens rea |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:57 PM Author: Twinkling Cerebral School Clown look faggot, one need not know obscure legal concepts to answer these questions. These questions are all about reasoning. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25690098) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:50 PM Author: Maniacal Halford Ceo has nothing to do w the fact that he's a broker. MDH's explanation below is tcr (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25690032) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:47 PM Author: Hateful laughsome theatre that it's reliable since for all he knows that famous finance dude was like "the following is something i thought of while high" but bond only heard the part AFTER that. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25690012) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:49 PM Author: Electric adulterous nowag friendly grandma yep (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25690018) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:51 PM Author: Deep House Weed Whacker the source is reliable the source is a famous financier |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:52 PM Author: Electric adulterous nowag friendly grandma famous financiers are incapable of talking out of their asses? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25690052) |
|
Date: June 5th, 2014 12:02 AM Author: Deep House Weed Whacker so what? it's still a reliable source of information, presuming that a famous financier is famous because of having good information and making lots of money because of it. that's consistent with the directions for the questions. |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:53 PM Author: Hateful laughsome theatre it's reliable if the guy told bond directly; it's not reliable when you have zero context. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25690058) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:54 PM Author: Deep House Weed Whacker that's the information itself, not the source that's why 4 is the answer. bond should have just cautioned him not to go crazy 3 and 4 are similar so whatever. |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:56 PM Author: Maniacal Halford Ceo lol u are 0 for 2 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25690089) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:56 PM Author: burgundy bull headed location (WUSTL grad who thinks the "source" of information is limited to the person who speaks it) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25690095) |
|
Date: June 5th, 2014 12:00 AM Author: Deep House Weed Whacker read the directions bitch and tell me what the source of the information is if it's not the financier? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25690127) |
|
Date: June 5th, 2014 12:07 AM Author: hyperventilating stage The answer choice says "misrepresented his knowledge of the situation." That's what he did. Acted like he had done research on this stock when all he did was overhear someone else talking about it.
4 also doesn't fit the fact pattern. |
|
Date: June 5th, 2014 12:15 AM Author: Hateful laughsome theatre yeah (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25690264) |
|
Date: June 5th, 2014 12:42 AM Author: Deep House Weed Whacker research from some broker is worth fuckall overhearing someone presumably better than you is worth lots 4 is exactly the fact pattern the best information is x, but be careful because I don't know why it's a good investment that's another way of saying 3, but the advice didn't cause his downfall, his failure to be cautious did. his failure to be cautious was bond's fault |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:56 PM Author: Deep House Weed Whacker even if he had been told directly, it wouldn't change the answer on this one. it's still just one guy's opinion. it's worth something, but you should still caution the advisee not to be stupid and invested too much (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25690085) |
|
Date: June 5th, 2014 12:05 AM Author: Hateful laughsome theatre no that's an argument but not the main one. the main one is because he never had the context or knew wtf the guy was talking about the advice wasn't really advice from the famous guy. it's like if you hear some great lawyer say "i'll nail them on a rule 11 they're finished" and you start telling your client "we'll get them on a rule 11" even though you have zero context.
if the financier said "bond, i got a great tip" then why not invest all your money? it's not about the amount he told him to invest it's that he did nothing to decide why the financier said that statement aloud. |
|
Date: June 5th, 2014 12:07 AM Author: Carmine plaza 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25690179) |
|
Date: November 3rd, 2015 8:05 AM Author: Exciting rebellious stag film (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#29100057) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2014 11:44 PM Author: Electric adulterous nowag friendly grandma 62. 1 61. 3 |
|
Date: June 5th, 2014 12:03 AM Author: Maniacal Halford Ceo lol FUCK THE OP for not giving the answers (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25690156) |
|
Date: June 5th, 2014 12:03 AM Author: Lavender cruise ship 61: i'm pretty certain that it's 3. seems pretty cut and dry.
62: this is a nasty one, because of how the premise of the question is really anachronistic. in modern times, it's common knowledge (well, at least in the set that takes the LSAT) that listening to financial talking heads, even successful ones, is a terrible investing strategy. you don't have to subscribe to the EMH to know this. but maybe in pre-90's times, this was good advice to the layperson.
given that, i'm going with 1 as tcr, though if this were on a modern day exam i'd be very tempted to go with 2. |
|
Date: June 5th, 2014 12:07 AM Author: Federal Duck-like Personal Credit Line 62 is clearly 1
the whole point of this situation is that it's not his job to tell him how much to invest. Goodfellow asked him for something to invest in and Bond told him. |
|
Date: June 5th, 2014 12:34 AM Author: Chartreuse Dead Dragon Market 1 is clearly the correct answer to 62, but knowing why depends on understanding the instructions and the question. Instructions are to assume an intelligent lay arbitrator decides the question, and the question asks what is the best justification for Bond's actions. 4 would be a good answer to excuse Bond of legal culpability for Goodfellow's losses in court, but not for the question asked.
Seems to me that this format is one of those that measures your ability to take a test, which everyone complains about but isn't a completely worthless metric for law school. |
|
Date: June 5th, 2014 12:10 AM Author: Ruby idiot 61 - 3 62 - 4 (2nd choice would be 1)
178 LSAT, but that was a long time ago |
|
Date: June 5th, 2014 12:13 AM Author: Federal Duck-like Personal Credit Line how is 62 4? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25690235) |
|
Date: June 5th, 2014 12:14 AM Author: Maniacal Halford Ceo for 62: 4 without 1 is useless. 1 is the main thing (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25690250) |
|
Date: June 5th, 2014 12:16 AM Author: Ruby idiot what if he knew he was incapable of assessing whether advice was appropriate?
I actually think 1 without 4 is useless. |
|
Date: June 5th, 2014 12:17 AM Author: Maniacal Halford Ceo then he shouldnt have given advice (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25690275) |
|
Date: June 5th, 2014 12:37 AM Author: Chartreuse Dead Dragon Market The fact that speculation in the stock market inherently involves the risk of losing your investment doesn't justify Bond giving advice; if anything, it's an argument against his actions. The question isn't "why isn't Bond responsible for Goodfellow's loss?" it's "why isn't Bond a complete asshole?" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25690464) |
|
Date: June 5th, 2014 12:15 AM Author: Maniacal Halford Ceo http://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585143&mc=2&forum_id=2 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25690261) |
|
Date: June 5th, 2014 12:27 AM Author: Balding Yarmulke Business Firm this is such horseshit. math is so much more difficult it makes me want to sepukku given how hard it is for me to understand math and how easy this is. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25690368) |
|
Date: June 5th, 2014 8:49 AM Author: razzle persian goyim On number 62, I see why a lot of people want to say 4, but here's the thing. 4 only helps if you assume Bond acted in good faith - if Bond intentionally gave him shit advice, 4 should not protect him. Answer 1 gives you that prerequisite - Bond gave him advice in good faith, and that argument can stand alone without any other assumptions.
61 was easy and I don't see how anyone is confused. |
|
Date: June 6th, 2014 4:23 AM Author: Twinkling Cerebral School Clown summon: twist (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25698775) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2014 4:10 AM Author: Curious hominid main people (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25789024) |
|
Date: July 4th, 2014 12:12 AM Author: Appetizing stubborn candlestick maker faggotry not really sure to be honest. 61 seems to be 3 or 4, 62 seems to be 1 or 2 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25867659) |
|
Date: June 6th, 2014 6:24 AM Author: Twinkling Cerebral School Clown (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25698947) |
|
Date: July 3rd, 2014 7:36 PM Author: charismatic wine rehab coffee pot (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#25866158) |
|
Date: July 4th, 2014 12:07 AM Author: Amethyst gas station travel guidebook 62 - 1
61 - 3 |
|
Date: August 15th, 2014 10:04 PM Author: Curious hominid main people (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#26137946) |
|
Date: August 17th, 2014 2:40 PM Author: Exciting rebellious stag film (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#26147026) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2015 11:50 AM Author: Twinkling Cerebral School Clown (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#27227488) |
|
Date: February 7th, 2015 11:32 AM Author: elite stock car (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#27267706) |
|
Date: May 18th, 2015 4:57 PM Author: Glittery free-loading codepig preventive strike (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#27916091) |
|
Date: November 3rd, 2015 6:47 AM Author: Exciting rebellious stag film (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#29099984) |
|
Date: November 3rd, 2015 8:14 AM Author: Salmon stimulating range 1, 3 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2585052&forum_id=2#29100078) |