The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Hypo: US U-17 Mens Soccer versus US Womens National Team
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 8th, 2014 1:27 PM Author: frisky aromatic giraffe Assume playing for $5 million prize money so there is motivation to win and dominate, each additional goal is $1 million. Loser gets nothing. Whats the final score?
|
Date: July 8th, 2014 1:28 PM Author: Copper bonkers degenerate school 12-0 Mens U-17 team (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2613191&forum_id=2#25891223) |
 |
Date: July 8th, 2014 2:49 PM Author: bistre trust fund (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2613191&forum_id=2#25891686) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2014 1:38 PM Author: crimson corner dingle berry Mens team dominates the Women.
My high school's boys soccer team dominated a D1 Big 12 womens soccer team once. not flame. |
|
Date: July 8th, 2014 3:04 PM Author: Wonderful rehab affirmative action how does a game like that even come about? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2613191&forum_id=2#25891776) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2014 3:39 PM Author: sepia institution really tough guy just your average xo hs story bro (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2613191&forum_id=2#25891948) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2014 3:42 PM Author: crimson corner dingle berry Select team that all the varsity bros from my hs played on played in a scrimmage against the womens team over the summer. shit like this happens more than you think. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2613191&forum_id=2#25891966) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2014 1:39 PM Author: carmine sneaky criminal menage I remember a documentary on the women's world cup team maybe eight years ago where the women held scrimmages against a (non-championship) college men's team. The entire point of it was that the women couldn't quite deal with the men's speed. The idea was that it would make their female competition feel slow. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2613191&forum_id=2#25891259) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2014 2:46 PM Author: snowy marketing idea USWNT vs a top level 14 or 15 year old boys team should produce a pretty good game. Any older than that and the boys team will absolutely dominate. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2613191&forum_id=2#25891676) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2014 2:50 PM Author: bistre trust fund (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2613191&forum_id=2#25891690) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2014 2:58 PM Author: Stirring Sienna Halford Locus Once the boys were old enough to be taller and faster than the women then I think the women's national team would start to struggle even if they were more skillful individually. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2613191&forum_id=2#25891742) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2014 4:03 PM Author: snowy marketing idea The women wouldn't be more skillful individually. The women's game is a bit lacking in individual skill. The players have too much time on the ball, and the goal is too large for the female keepers to cover adequately. The women's team would be more organized tactically. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2613191&forum_id=2#25892039) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2014 2:49 PM Author: Poppy Provocative Parlour An average high school football team can beat the US women's soccer team in soccer. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2613191&forum_id=2#25891683) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2014 2:50 PM Author: crimson corner dingle berry I doubt that (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2613191&forum_id=2#25891689) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2014 2:52 PM Author: Poppy Provocative Parlour Strength, size and speed alone would carry them to victory. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2613191&forum_id=2#25891697) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2014 2:52 PM Author: crimson corner dingle berry you're talking about an american football team? no. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2613191&forum_id=2#25891702) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2014 2:53 PM Author: Poppy Provocative Parlour American Football players. T.O. Ocho Cinco football. Take them and they would beat the US women's soccer team in soccer. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2613191&forum_id=2#25891709) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2014 2:54 PM Author: crimson corner dingle berry interesting theory but nah brother (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2613191&forum_id=2#25891714) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2014 2:54 PM Author: Poppy Provocative Parlour Guaranteed. And it wouldn't be a game either. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2613191&forum_id=2#25891717) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2014 3:04 PM Author: honey-headed roommate (it is 2007) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2613191&forum_id=2#25891777) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2014 2:51 PM Author: Stirring Sienna Halford Locus The U-17 national team would beat them but not some random HS team. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2613191&forum_id=2#25891695) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2014 2:52 PM Author: Poppy Provocative Parlour Not some random HS team...a random high school FOOTBALL team could. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2613191&forum_id=2#25891701) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2014 2:53 PM Author: Stirring Sienna Halford Locus lolno
|
|
Date: July 8th, 2014 2:53 PM Author: Poppy Provocative Parlour yes. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2613191&forum_id=2#25891713) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2014 2:56 PM Author: Stirring Sienna Halford Locus You're talking about a team of guys who can't dribble, can't kick the ball accurately, can't trap the ball with their feet, can't head the ball, probably can't make a legal throw-in, can't tackle without fouling, don't know anything about positioning or tactics and whose goalkeeper would be hopeless. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2613191&forum_id=2#25891730) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2014 2:56 PM Author: crimson corner dingle berry pretty sure the poster is johnsmeyer so you know... (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2613191&forum_id=2#25891733) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2014 2:59 PM Author: Poppy Provocative Parlour I still believe this. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2613191&forum_id=2#25891748) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2014 3:00 PM Author: crimson corner dingle berry well you're dead wrong brother (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2613191&forum_id=2#25891757) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2014 3:01 PM Author: Poppy Provocative Parlour Nope Im correct. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2613191&forum_id=2#25891768) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2014 2:58 PM Author: Poppy Provocative Parlour Just put your tallest in goal. LOL at all of the other stuff. Do you realize how night and day women are to men wrt sports? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2613191&forum_id=2#25891737) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2014 3:01 PM Author: Stirring Sienna Halford Locus Put your tallest in goal and watch while he stands there cluelessly trying to stop the dozens of free kicks and penalties the women's team would earn.
Men and women are night and day in most sports when they both have the same background in the sport. But you're assuming a team of American footballers, not actual male soccer players. |
|
Date: July 8th, 2014 3:02 PM Author: Poppy Provocative Parlour Just put your kickers in a positing to make the shots on goal and box in the women so they can't take the shots. It's not that hard. You're clueless. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2613191&forum_id=2#25891770) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2014 3:05 PM Author: Stirring Sienna Halford Locus I should have taken the advice to ignore this flame. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2613191&forum_id=2#25891783) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2014 3:40 PM Author: tantric home mad-dog skullcap It's Obama's America. It's likely that at least half of the football team played some form of organized soccer for a lot of their childhood. Average 6A/7A High School football team wins. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2613191&forum_id=2#25891957) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2014 3:44 PM Author: Poppy Provocative Parlour Agreed. Who are these soccer white knights ITT taking the women's side? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2613191&forum_id=2#25891976) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2014 2:57 PM Author: olive cuckold house No, they really wouldn't. Have you ever seen a really good athlete who never touched a soccer ball try to kick one? Kind of looks like a girl trying to throw a football. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2613191&forum_id=2#25891735) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2014 2:59 PM Author: Poppy Provocative Parlour Doesn't matter. The male football player's athleticism will carry him. They're faster and stronger. They can basically have the two kickers making all the shots on goal. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2613191&forum_id=2#25891747) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2014 3:03 PM Author: olive cuckold house According to your logic, then, an African soccer team should win every World Cup. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2613191&forum_id=2#25891774) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2014 3:04 PM Author: Stirring Sienna Halford Locus I'll grant that the kickers can probably kick a stationary soccer ball pretty well. So your male American football team can take goal kicks (and they would get a lot of them) without being humiliated. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2613191&forum_id=2#25891779) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2014 3:07 PM Author: Wonderful rehab affirmative action U-17 boys v. USWNT - boys would win very easily. This seems like a great idea for a televised game, wonder why it hasn't happened yet. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2613191&forum_id=2#25891795) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2014 3:09 PM Author: crimson corner dingle berry because the boys would win easily (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2613191&forum_id=2#25891802) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2014 3:23 PM Author: Excitant confused fortuitous meteor They played this game in approximately 2000, and the U17's won like 6-0 or something.
I trained with members of the 1999 team when I was in High School, and the juniors/senior guys who were college ball ready beat the women easily, even if the women were more technically sound. |
|
Date: July 8th, 2014 3:32 PM Author: olive cuckold house Did you pat Mia's ass in the handshake line at least? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2613191&forum_id=2#25891914) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2014 3:33 PM Author: Excitant confused fortuitous meteor nah it was a GK camp actually so I was playing with Scurry. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2613191&forum_id=2#25891920) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2014 3:25 PM Author: Excitant confused fortuitous meteor Here is a summary of a more recent scrimmage:
I recently got back from two scrimmage games over the weekend at the Home Depot Center; the U.S. woman's national team vs. ODP B92, and a second game vs. ODP B93. The Scrimmage was set up in two games of ninety minutes, with three thirty minute periods for each game. The USWNT was divided into two equal teams of 12 or so players. The first group played the early game vs. a full side of eighteen 92 boys. The second group of players played the 93 boys an hour later after conclusion of the first match.
USWNT vs. ODP B92
Verses the ODP B92 the USWNT was soundly beaten 5-1. It very well could have been much worse, the US keeper came up with brilliant point blank save, after save.
The good & bad:
USWNT was tactical superior, and had long stretches of crisp possession in the middle attacking third of the field. The U.S. also demonstrated a quality first touch and driven balls were surprisingly accurate and well timed. ODP 92 where much faster and explosive to the ball and were able to take advantage of this by out pacing the U.S. back line on through balls played into space. Vice versa the superiority in flat out speed also force the USWNT to play in front of the boys back four, hamstringing their two forwards. Although the USWNT had the majority of the possession the ODP 92's had the lion's share of quality chances.
USWNT vs. ODP B93
Against the ODP B93 the USWNT looked much better. The speed of the players was on par with the younger boys. Although I could not stay to see the game to its conclusion, through the first 60 minutes the B93's were up 2-0.
The good & bad:
Against the B93 the game was much more balanced, both sides played a fast pace game and the speed on the field was very much equal. An enjoyable game to watch. Although the boys were ahead after 60 minutes the score line could have very well been 2-0 in favor of the ladies.
Side Note:
I suspect that all the teams that were involved were asked to ratchet down the physicality as not to injure anyone. This undoubtedly was a good thing because in the handful of collisions that did occur the women more then not got the worst of it."
http://forums.bigsoccer.com/threads/uswnt-vs-so-cal-boys-odp.929075/
BTW: This game was against a Southern California select team, not even the full national team |
|
Date: July 8th, 2014 4:01 PM Author: multi-colored property I remember that post on bigsoccer and was about to reference it here. Just to make clear, that was in 2009 so the '92 boys were 17 and the '93 boys 16. You'd have to get to a U-14 national team before the USWNT would have a clear advantage. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2613191&forum_id=2#25892032) |