bar bros - q re family law and jdx
| sickened associate kitty cat | 07/22/14 | | silver site tattoo | 07/23/14 | | sickened associate kitty cat | 07/23/14 | | silver site tattoo | 07/23/14 | | Concupiscible crackhouse | 07/23/14 | | sickened associate kitty cat | 07/23/14 | | Concupiscible crackhouse | 07/23/14 | | silver site tattoo | 07/23/14 | | sickened associate kitty cat | 07/23/14 | | flirting old irish cottage | 07/23/14 | | Fragrant digit ratio | 07/23/14 | | sickened associate kitty cat | 07/23/14 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 22nd, 2014 11:51 PM Author: sickened associate kitty cat
am i right to say that state courts only require personal jurisdiction?
im on DAT THEMIS and the outlines are dogshit on this point. i seem to recall in the federal jurisdiction lecture the lecturer mentioning that state courts are courts of general jurisdiction and can hear any claim as long as there's personal jurisdiction.
is this right?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2625719&forum_id=2#25984969) |
|
Date: July 23rd, 2014 1:33 AM Author: sickened associate kitty cat
that's right. ty my brother. that's the ex parte divorce doctrine. much appreciated.
im in a state w/90 day residency rqrmt. i imagine there's in rem for if the marriage occurred there, but DAT THEMIS doesn't even cover it.
~_~
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2625719&forum_id=2#25985416) |
Date: July 23rd, 2014 1:20 AM Author: Concupiscible crackhouse
i think that is a cr way of looking at it. family law issues are always state law issues so if there is PJ, then they should be able to entertain it.
i dont think you will ever be faced with a Q that deals with whether the court has smj over a divorce, custody, cp/sp, etc. it will probably be focused more on the pj aspect like if the P has lived in the state long enough to file for divorce in it, whether the property is is in the forum, where the child lives, etc
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2625719&forum_id=2#25985352) |
|
Date: July 23rd, 2014 1:29 AM Author: sickened associate kitty cat
im a dumb man. i didnt realize that the 90 day residency rqrmt was the general basis for smj to grant a divorce. i didnt piece together that that would also apply to distribution, custody, alimony, etc until just this second.
the reason i was confused about the whole thing is bc the uniform child custody jurisdiction and enforcement act has complex rules regarding smj for granting/modifying child custody.
ty for makign me think this through.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2625719&forum_id=2#25985386) |
Date: July 23rd, 2014 1:28 AM Author: Fragrant digit ratio
lol no
bankruptcy
federal antitrust
federal securities
admiralty
patent/copyright
treason
ambassadors
state vs state
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2625719&forum_id=2#25985382) |
|
Date: July 23rd, 2014 1:31 AM Author: sickened associate kitty cat
right.
i was more concerned with the family law matter.
confusing post i guess.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2625719&forum_id=2#25985394) |
|
|