Biglaw Lit > In-House BD Compliance $180k
| Chestnut milk | 07/30/14 | | vibrant hall tank | 07/30/14 | | Chestnut milk | 07/30/14 | | vibrant hall tank | 07/30/14 | | Chestnut milk | 07/30/14 | | vibrant hall tank | 07/30/14 | | Chestnut milk | 07/30/14 | | vibrant hall tank | 07/30/14 | | Chestnut milk | 07/30/14 | | vibrant hall tank | 07/30/14 | | Mauve aromatic french chef | 07/30/14 | | Dashing ratface | 07/30/14 | | vibrant hall tank | 07/30/14 | | Dashing ratface | 07/30/14 | | vibrant hall tank | 07/30/14 | | Dashing ratface | 07/30/14 | | vibrant hall tank | 07/30/14 | | Dashing ratface | 07/30/14 | | Chestnut milk | 07/30/14 | | talented sound barrier | 07/30/14 | | Chestnut milk | 07/30/14 | | talented sound barrier | 07/30/14 | | Chestnut milk | 07/30/14 | | talented sound barrier | 07/30/14 | | vibrant hall tank | 07/30/14 | | Chestnut milk | 07/30/14 | | vibrant hall tank | 07/30/14 | | Chestnut milk | 07/30/14 | | talented sound barrier | 07/30/14 | | Azure demanding ticket booth indirect expression | 08/06/14 | | Dashing ratface | 07/30/14 | | Chestnut milk | 07/30/14 | | Dashing ratface | 07/30/14 | | Chestnut milk | 07/30/14 | | Chestnut milk | 07/30/14 | | Dashing ratface | 07/30/14 | | Chestnut milk | 07/30/14 | | Dashing ratface | 07/30/14 | | Chestnut milk | 07/30/14 | | Dashing ratface | 07/30/14 | | Chestnut milk | 07/30/14 | | Dashing ratface | 08/05/14 | | Chestnut milk | 08/07/14 | | Dashing ratface | 08/07/14 | | Chestnut milk | 08/07/14 | | Dashing ratface | 08/07/14 | | Chestnut milk | 07/30/14 | | Chestnut milk | 08/04/14 | | vibrant hall tank | 08/05/14 | | Stubborn amethyst psychic | 08/05/14 | | Chestnut milk | 08/07/14 | | Disturbing underhanded twinkling uncleanness | 08/05/14 | | Twisted lodge dog poop | 08/05/14 | | Disturbing underhanded twinkling uncleanness | 08/05/14 | | Twisted lodge dog poop | 08/05/14 | | Disturbing underhanded twinkling uncleanness | 08/05/14 | | Twisted lodge dog poop | 08/06/14 | | talented sound barrier | 08/05/14 | | exhilarant corner skinny woman | 08/05/14 | | Disturbing underhanded twinkling uncleanness | 08/06/14 | | Azure demanding ticket booth indirect expression | 08/06/14 | | talented sound barrier | 08/06/14 | | Disturbing underhanded twinkling uncleanness | 08/07/14 | | talented sound barrier | 08/07/14 | | Stubborn amethyst psychic | 08/07/14 | | Stubborn amethyst psychic | 08/07/14 | | Stubborn amethyst psychic | 08/06/14 | | exhilarant corner skinny woman | 08/06/14 | | Stubborn amethyst psychic | 08/06/14 | | exhilarant corner skinny woman | 08/06/14 | | Chestnut milk | 08/07/14 | | Curious Brindle Stead | 08/06/14 | | Disturbing underhanded twinkling uncleanness | 08/07/14 | | Twisted lodge dog poop | 08/07/14 | | Stubborn amethyst psychic | 08/07/14 | | talented sound barrier | 08/07/14 | | Stubborn amethyst psychic | 08/07/14 | | talented sound barrier | 08/07/14 | | Stubborn amethyst psychic | 08/07/14 | | Stubborn amethyst psychic | 08/07/14 | | Saffron love of her life hell | 08/07/14 | | vibrant hall tank | 08/06/14 | | Curious Brindle Stead | 08/06/14 | | vibrant hall tank | 08/06/14 | | Stubborn amethyst psychic | 08/06/14 | | Azure demanding ticket booth indirect expression | 08/07/14 | | Dashing ratface | 08/07/14 | | vibrant hall tank | 08/07/14 | | Dashing ratface | 08/07/14 | | Chestnut milk | 08/07/14 | | talented sound barrier | 08/06/14 | | vibrant hall tank | 08/06/14 | | talented sound barrier | 08/06/14 | | vibrant hall tank | 08/07/14 | | talented sound barrier | 08/07/14 | | Disturbing underhanded twinkling uncleanness | 08/07/14 | | talented sound barrier | 08/07/14 | | Chestnut milk | 08/07/14 | | vibrant hall tank | 08/07/14 | | Chestnut milk | 08/07/14 | | vibrant hall tank | 08/07/14 | | vibrant hall tank | 08/08/14 | | Obsidian Soul-stirring Quadroon Weed Whacker | 08/07/14 | | passionate bawdyhouse cuckold | 07/03/20 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 30th, 2014 5:45 PM Author: Chestnut milk Subject: Worth it?
Dood I went to LS with is talking about it. I think he's a fourth year. Could be lying about comp.
Is this credited or a bad idea?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2632164&forum_id=2#26030350) |
Date: July 30th, 2014 6:49 PM Author: Dashing ratface
It is a pretty chill job. Dealing with regulatory inquiries, drafting compliance manuals, issuing regulatory updates, etc. $180K seems about right for a senior dude. I know some peeps that do this at JPMS and they make about that much as senior regulatory/compliance dudes.
Edit: Sometimes these guys make a jump to legal. So, he has that going for him.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2632164&forum_id=2#26030718) |
|
Date: July 30th, 2014 7:30 PM Author: talented sound barrier
i'm not sure, but i would assume not that difficult?
i mean, we're already talking about niche spaces to begin with and if you're limiting yourself to only candidates from RIAs (v. HFs, FCMs, BDs, etc etc), you're prob not going to have many people come through the door.
i think the person getting the job likely has a connection though, regardless of what field they are in. that's how i see most of the back office jobs being filled here.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2632164&forum_id=2#26030913) |
|
Date: July 30th, 2014 6:54 PM Author: Dashing ratface
He will still be doing legal work, except it is regulatory compliance. There are firms that have practices dedicated to just this. About 1/3 of my legal work comes from compliance bros.
I almost jumped ship to compliance. I was 1 stage away from doing compliance work for a Scandanavian entity. FMA. I would have spent half the year in Scandinavai.
Edit: He can leverage his experience to get back into law later on. He will learn
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2632164&forum_id=2#26030739) |
|
Date: July 30th, 2014 7:29 PM Author: Dashing ratface
Really? Bro just told me about both agencies needing trial attys. Perhaps, it was just hallway chatter. CFTC wants to stop being the red headed step child. Also, i agree with USAjobs being flame.
Edit: I enjoy my work place. It gets frustrating at times, but I get to do fund formation. That is something I always wanted to do.
U involved in dat MFG mess?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2632164&forum_id=2#26030910) |
Date: August 5th, 2014 6:56 PM Author: Stubborn amethyst psychic
Given how many "thoughts" you want on this, I'd say your friend is you.
I worked in a dep't like this pre-LS and think about going back. I'll answer Qs.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2632164&forum_id=2#26068605) |
|
Date: August 7th, 2014 5:28 PM Author: Chestnut milk
Thanks for posting. I used to be more active on here years ago and it can be confirmed that my career path is a bit different than this guy.
So does the comp make sense? Like I said, I'm not sure how true it is.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2632164&forum_id=2#26082264)
|
Date: August 5th, 2014 9:12 PM Author: Disturbing underhanded twinkling uncleanness
Compliance sucks. Don't know what to tell you. Would avoid if possible. I get that CCO of Blackstone or whatever makes a lot of money, but that's not your track if you start off at a junior level.
180k is nice and if you are on the verge of quitting, ok. But I would hold out for a legal position if you think that is possible in a few years.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2632164&forum_id=2#26069386) |
|
Date: August 5th, 2014 10:50 PM Author: talented sound barrier
i agree that compliance sucks as a general matter and the work is mind-numbing but i think this is a decent option for the "friend" b/c:
1) he is a shitttigator and has very little chance of getting in-house legal as a general matter, particularly at that high level of pay. $180k is definitely not an entry-level position, which is more in the $80-100k range after bonus.
2) i don't think it'd be that difficult to move from compliance to legal once he's got his foot in the door b/c he'd be in a relatively niche industry and he'd have a leg up on most attorneys coming from big firms, 95% of whom are just general corporate attys with no specialized knowledge of the industry, just like he was when he went in-house.
3) he likely won't become cco at morgan stanley, but he can jump to smaller places later on in his career where he can be cco. he's not going to be making millions, but $400-500k as cco at a smaller boutique which is very common when it's a reputable place is nothing to scoff at.
4) i think for mid-level biglaw associates, they need to start thinking of just getting your foot in the door in the first place. embarking on a specific industry path is a lot more beneficial than continuing to be a generalist. that's one of the problems w/ being in biglaw that most associates rarely specialize in any particular industry so they're not a particularly attractive candidate for any particular company. you might be doing debt financing, but that doesn't mean you do it for film studios, for instance. he may never have an opportunity in this particular industry again due to his background. but once you're in the field and have your foot in, you have a leg up and the options open up b/c there are so few people actually competing with you. and this particular field happens to be one of the more lucrative ones.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2632164&forum_id=2#26070052) |
|
Date: August 6th, 2014 12:13 PM Author: Disturbing underhanded twinkling uncleanness
180k is nice and if this job is the best you can do, there is no shame in it.
I think dreams of being CCO at a hedge fund making 400k are pretty unlikely, TBH. Those jobs are rare and generally require a lot of experience and often are also mixed in with the GC role. Even if you do make it to CCO and make a lot of money, you are getting paid to do really, really horrible, boring shit that makes law seem like an intellectual paradise. Your $ per hour (CCOs work a lot) compared to law or business is very poor. Compliance is not a legal job - you don't need a JD to do compliance. that's the way you need to think about it.
I really would not hold out much hope of moving from compliance to legal. I'm sure it happens, but I haven't seen it happen. If anything, the reverse is more likely - moving from legal to compliance. I've known a couple lawyers who have had to quit large banks after threatened with a move to compliance - its a type of layoff. Compliance is busy and hard to staff because it is so meaningless and there is so little upward mobility, so they won't want to give up the "friend" once the "friend" is there.
Listen, life is what you make it and I am sure there are fact patterns where this could lead to a great legal career. My own view is that you shouldn't go into Career X (in this case compliance) in order to get to Career Y (legal or business), but you should try to go directly even if it requires a paycut or waiting a few more years.
But, if that is not possible and you think your other options will lead to working in claims at an insurance company or something similarly horrible, $180k is a ton of cash so it totally makes sense. You just need to balance your other options.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2632164&forum_id=2#26073172) |
|
Date: August 6th, 2014 11:16 PM Author: talented sound barrier
most of this post is wrong.
first, i don't know where you get that get that compliance folks work hard. they work 40-45 hrs/week at most places, which is a normal job. there are rarely any fire drills and very rarely any real issues. the work is mostly routine on a set schedule and if anything gets escalated where you're actually interacting w/ the SEC or FINRA, legal generally takes over. i did remember interviewing for a goldman sachs compliance job when i was in biglaw where they worked 7:30-8pm everyday and that is definitely one exception to the rule. it's GS, so of course it is more intense.
as for getting stuck in a compliance track...assuming that's true, so what? it is not the death knell. there are tons of lucrative compliance jobs outside of being CCO. as an example, i got a recruiter call for guggenheim partners regarding a compliance officer position which was only recruiting existing in-house legal or compliance folks, not big firm associates. this is a VP position paying around $250-300k. they preferred a compliance and not legal in-house person for this position. positions like these are dime a dozen and open to anybody who is already in a somewhat senior compliance role, which $180k would be. they are not open to big firm attorneys. if you told your average biglaw associate that they may make $150-200k for 5 years and then they can make $250-300k for 25 years working 40-45 hours/week until retirement, it sounds like an awesome career outcome.
as for moving from in-house compliance to legal, the reason you don't see it happening is b/c you see a extremely tiny slice of the entire universe of in-house legal and compliance jobs from people you know. my firm works with over a hundred 100 broker dealers, fund administrators, custodians, and other service providers for mutual funds, hedge funds, etc. i've gotten to know some compliance folks very well at some of these place, a bunch of them have JDs, and if a legal job opens up, these people will have a leg up on any big firm associate without question.
once you're actually in the industry, you start realizing exactly how many positions there are and how few people are actually competitive. if you're a compliance guy w/ a JD and a biglaw resume with all the bells and whistles, you may be beat out by an in-house legal guy w/ the same resume, but there's frankly not enough competition from in-house legal folks to shut you out completely. either way, you have an undisputed leg up on every big firm associate, unless you're actually an associate at the firm servicing the fund.
breaking into the industry and establishing the connections is a lot more effective than waiting around on the outside for the in-house legal job to open up.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2632164&forum_id=2#26077449) |
|
Date: August 7th, 2014 4:07 PM Author: Disturbing underhanded twinkling uncleanness
BB compliance people work hard. If he's getting paid 180k, he'll probably have to work hard. Could be an exception, but I wouldn't count on it.
I agree that these positions are a dime a dozen. There is a reason why they are that way. There is very little upside here and the job is boring as shit. I'm not saying 180k or 250k tops is bad or anything, but the job sucks. I can't believe you are arguing this with me. and, again, you probably aren't making 250k at guggenheim and working 40 hrs a week. That's not how it works at a large institution. And 250k kinda sucks for a JD at a large financial institution.
the compliance people may or may not have a "leg up" at a legal job opening. A compliance job is a "JD preferred" job. You are not really a lawyer. Yes, you might be able to move up at your current shop if you perform, but its risky, and it will be very hard to go into a legal job at some other shop. And, if you want a legal job anyway, why do compliance? It's not a legal job.
inhouse jobs are hard to find and extremely competitive. I don't know what you are smoking. Some guy with compliance on his resume might have a leg up at another job that also involves some compliance, but you are kidding yourself if you don't think there are literally thousands of asset management biglaw resumes floating around out there. also i really do think someone whose spent 7 years doing corporate law at a big firm is indisputably in a much better position to get an inhouse legal job than someone who did 3 years at a firm and then 4 years doing compliance.
i would hold out, but that's just me. I also did corporate from the start. It sounds like this person will have a litigation law firm background and then a compliance in house background. Could that lead to a corporate in house job some day? Maybe, but it's an uphill battle and there is a real risk that you stay in compliance forever, and you will want to kill yourself.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2632164&forum_id=2#26081724)
|
|
Date: August 7th, 2014 7:20 PM Author: talented sound barrier
i think the issue here is that you don't really know what exactly legal and compliance jobs mean in the asset management industry. you seem to think that legal and compliance are 2 completely different tracks and being in legal means you're doing "sophisticated" legal work running "deals" while in compliance, you're writing compliance manuals and running a credit risk analysis.
the reality is that a lawyer in asset management will be, at a minimum, doing at least 25-30% compliance-related work. there are no "deals" in the biglaw sense of the word. you negotiate agreements with clients and service providers which are standard forms for the most part. that is the only purely legal work. everything else that legal does entails supporting other groups - compliance, IR, S&T, etc. it really isn't legal work.
because so much of in-house legal isn't actually legal work, a 7 year corporate law associate isn't the best candidate for the job. corporate law skills are completely irrelevant for the job. they would absolutely pick the guy w/ 3 years corporate and then 4 years compliance over the guy who spent 7 years at a big firm. there is much more overlap btwn compliance and legal than you think.
and no, there are not "thousands" of asset management biglaw resumes floating around. there are about 3-5 firms with strong asset management practices and they're all v50-100 type firms with more reasonable rates. it's not a particularly lucrative practice area for big firms b/c there isn't much high stakes work coming out of it. your average V20 candiate will not have any experience that appeals to your average asset management firm.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2632164&forum_id=2#26082947) |
|
Date: August 6th, 2014 7:03 PM Author: Stubborn amethyst psychic
Bro, have you ever worked in legal or compliance at a bank? Because I have and your advice ITT is totally wrong in nearly every respect.
First, your resume is not "stained" with compliance in a broker-dealer context -- I worked at a B/D before LS and the guy I reported to was in compliance. He had previously been biglawyer and occupied various in-house roles both in legal and compliance, moving back and forth between them easily. I worked with a guy whose career trajectory was V3 -> BD legal > BD business > BD compliance > BD legal.
The 180k compliance jobs you get out of biglaw are not the shitty ones they offer to entry level people (like me, out of college). They are hardly distinguishable from legal, and your pay is more based on seniority/perceived competence/bootlicking (HEAVY emphasis on the last) than whether you are legal or compliance.
Second, assuming -- the the sake of argument -- that it's even slightly easier to get a job going in-house legal to in-house legal than in-house compliance to in-house legal, it is 100X easier to go in-house compliance to in-house legal than lawfirm midlevel to either. Banks are ALL about who you know and your reputation as a worker/asskisser. Your faceless v10 resume is literally a shitstain compared to knowing people inside, and having worked with them.
I'm working on going in-house right now and every bit of traction I get is my connections in the industry. If you have law firm experience and a 180k compliance job you are FAR better positioned to move to legal than being at a law firm.
This whole post is proceeding on the premise that in-house legal is far better than compliance and something everyone wants to shift to, which is also false. There are very high-profile and high paid compliance positions at banks (well below CCO level) that are better than many legal positions.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2632164&forum_id=2#26075729) |
|
Date: August 7th, 2014 4:17 PM Author: Disturbing underhanded twinkling uncleanness
honestly don't disagree with anything in your poast and don't how it at all conflicts with my poast. well, except that your resume is "stained" with compliance, like it or not.
I literally get 3 calls a day from headhunters about compliance jobs. These jobs are so hard to fill because they suck so much, they are literally desperate. Getting a true legal inhouse job is much more difficult and requires leveraging your network, like you say.
I didn't say that it is impossible to get a decent job out of compliance. Obviously bootlicking is key and you can move your way up. I'm just saying its not the best first entry point for someone coming from a top firm - unless you are talking about one of those legal jobs where they call the entire legal department "legal and compliance."
The question I always ask people is - what do you want to do? Do you want to review marketing materials and write compliance policies? Or do you want to do deal work? The people who do deal work are on a better track than the people who write compliance policies. In particular, if you someday want to move over to the business side, compliance is a step in the wrong direction.
"There are very high-profile and high paid compliance positions at banks (well below CCO level) that are better than many legal positions."
Of course there are. What's your point? There are also many janitors in the city of NY that get paid more than junior investment bankers. So what?
Perhaps part of our disconnect is that I'm coming from a V5. I could see how if you were at a mediocre law firm, perhaps you should just take whatever in into the bank you can get. At a top tier firm, though, going into a compliance role would be viewed as a bad exit option.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2632164&forum_id=2#26081796) |
|
Date: August 7th, 2014 7:04 PM Author: Stubborn amethyst psychic
I don't really know how to help you except that not all compliance jobs are created equal and you don't seem to know the difference. You have absolutely no insight into how B/D compliance jobs work, or how BD/s work in general, and so your only basis for disagreeing with me are bald assertions such as "your resume is "stained" with compliance, like it or not." having watched tons of people first hand go back and forth between legal and compliance, you can imagine how compelling this "argument" is to me.
You are literally talking in generalities about "deal work" versus compliance policies to people who have actually worked with legal and compliance people at at a broker-dealer. By the way, broker-dealer lawyers are not "deal lawyers" -- they support sales & trading, not the M&A function of the bank. But don't let your complete lack of familiarity with investment banks stop you from giving people advice or anything. (What do you do at your v5, btw, labor and employment?)
The point is that the the compliance roles better than legal roles at banks aren't only super senior janitors compared to super junior lawyers.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2632164&forum_id=2#26082838) |
|
Date: August 6th, 2014 11:55 PM Author: talented sound barrier
yes, $170. i receive an annual bonus so i don't see any extra money until then.
they told me bonus is typically it's 50-75% but last year was an exceptional year for the market, hence 100% bonuses.
this year is an exceptional year in that AUM has skyrocketed b/c everybody's dumping their money into equities, but the market itself is not doing so great.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2632164&forum_id=2#26077772) |
|
|