Scholars should refrain from being activists; scholarship is TOO
| out-of-control point | 09/16/14 | | out-of-control point | 09/16/14 | | Shimmering dilemma nowag | 09/16/14 | | out-of-control point | 09/17/14 | | Dashing headpube | 09/17/14 | | Dashing headpube | 09/17/14 | | Deep office reading party | 09/17/14 | | Dashing headpube | 09/17/14 | | mauve concupiscible shrine masturbator | 09/17/14 | | Dashing headpube | 09/17/14 | | Dashing headpube | 09/18/14 | | Lascivious senate national security agency | 09/18/14 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: September 16th, 2014 6:29 AM Author: out-of-control point
fucking important.
The argument hereof — http://chroniclevitae.com/news/703-after-ferguson-some-black-academics-wonder-does-pursuing-a-ph-d-matter — is that scholars, PhDs, and PhD students should, as a result of Ferguson, become more like activists: vehemently "fighting" the perils of racism, prejudice, and ignorance thereof.
But the work of a scholar ought to be objective. Their role in this world is very specific, but one of the most important: seeking knowledge through research. One is unlikely to accomplish that with an activist mindset.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2675954&forum_id=2#26338026)
|
|
|