\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

No prosecutor? No defense lawyer? No problem

http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/no_prosecutor_no_defe...
slap-happy canary set
  09/18/14
That ought to be criminal.
exhilarant trust fund lay
  09/18/14
rofl
hairraiser mint messiness
  09/18/14
lol. The Judge is right to punish the wicked.
Sable vigorous ape gunner
  09/18/14
...
Spectacular buck-toothed hospital
  09/18/14
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tUltrX-ICew
Gold rambunctious business firm black woman
  09/18/14
Alpha.
Drab whorehouse alpha
  09/18/14
the law school from whence this judge graduated ought to los...
flushed big-titted school preventive strike
  09/18/14
...
Talented seedy heaven antidepressant drug
  09/18/14
"DiLeo then advised the Kirklands of their Fifth Amendm...
Swollen Bronze Pervert
  09/18/14
...
exhilarant trust fund lay
  09/18/14
180
slap-happy canary set
  09/18/14
I helped a friend in a Phoenix traffic court matter a few ye...
Talented seedy heaven antidepressant drug
  09/18/14
...
concupiscible lemon friendly grandma
  09/18/14


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: September 18th, 2014 1:35 PM
Author: slap-happy canary set

http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/no_prosecutor_no_defense_lawyer_judge_allegedly_held_trial_anyway

A judge accused of trying two defendants without a prosecutor or defense lawyers may have shed his immunity to a civil rights suit, a federal appeals court has ruled.

The Philadelphia-based 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against Municipal Judge Louis DiLeo of Linden, New Jersey, who was not reappointed to his post after the incident, the New Jersey Law Journal reports.

A trial judge had denied DiLeo’s motions to dismiss on the grounds of absolute judicial immunity and 11th Amendment immunity, and the 3rd Circuit affirmed. The civil rights plaintiffs—who were convicted in the unusual trial—had made out a plausible claim that DiLeo’s actions “went beyond legal error, such that he was no longer functioning in his judicial capacity,” the appeals court said in the Sept. 10 nonprecedential opinion (PDF). The appeals court also allowed claims against the city of Linden.

DiLeo was accused of trying and convicting Wendell and Anthony Kirkland on charges of theft, possession of burglary tools and marijuana possession, the New Jersey Law Journal says. (Earlier coverage identifies the Kirklands as brothers, while the New Jersey Law Journal says they are cousins.)

The Kirklands say the trial began at 9:13 p.m. on May 12, 2010, and wrapped up in less than an hour. It is undisputed that neither the prosecutor nor defense lawyers were present, according to the trial judge’s opinion in the case. DiLeo allegedly told the defendants on a prior occasion that they had waived their right to a public defender after they earlier said they would retain private counsel.

During the trial, DiLeo questioned the arresting officer and allowed cross-examination by the defendants. After the officer’s testimony, DiLeo asked the Kirklands if they had evidence, and they said they had witnesses but they were not present. DiLeo proceeded anyway, according to the lower court opinion.

DiLeo then advised the Kirklands of their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and allowed them to testify. Both did so, and they were cross-examined by the arresting officer. DiLeo then questioned Anthony Kirkland. At the conclusion of the trial, DiLeo found both defendants guilty. Their convictions were later vacated.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2677687&forum_id=2#26351240)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 18th, 2014 1:48 PM
Author: exhilarant trust fund lay

That ought to be criminal.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2677687&forum_id=2#26351320)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 18th, 2014 1:50 PM
Author: hairraiser mint messiness

rofl

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2677687&forum_id=2#26351328)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 18th, 2014 1:56 PM
Author: Sable vigorous ape gunner

lol. The Judge is right to punish the wicked.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2677687&forum_id=2#26351369)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 18th, 2014 2:07 PM
Author: Spectacular buck-toothed hospital



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2677687&forum_id=2#26351426)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 18th, 2014 2:01 PM
Author: Gold rambunctious business firm black woman

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tUltrX-ICew

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2677687&forum_id=2#26351398)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 18th, 2014 2:04 PM
Author: Drab whorehouse alpha

Alpha.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2677687&forum_id=2#26351412)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 18th, 2014 2:08 PM
Author: flushed big-titted school preventive strike

the law school from whence this judge graduated ought to lose its accreditation

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2677687&forum_id=2#26351435)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 18th, 2014 3:52 PM
Author: Talented seedy heaven antidepressant drug



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2677687&forum_id=2#26352010)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 18th, 2014 2:09 PM
Author: Swollen Bronze Pervert

"DiLeo then advised the Kirklands of their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and allowed them to testify. Both did so, and they were cross-examined by the arresting officer."

That may be the best part.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2677687&forum_id=2#26351439)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 18th, 2014 2:37 PM
Author: exhilarant trust fund lay



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2677687&forum_id=2#26351578)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 18th, 2014 4:40 PM
Author: slap-happy canary set

180

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2677687&forum_id=2#26352211)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 18th, 2014 3:56 PM
Author: Talented seedy heaven antidepressant drug

I helped a friend in a Phoenix traffic court matter a few years ago. The state was not required to be represented by a lawyer and could show up via the cops who wrote the tickets.

The cops could have examined the defendants, but based on the trials I saw that day, the cops never did so.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2677687&forum_id=2#26352026)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 18th, 2014 4:50 PM
Author: concupiscible lemon friendly grandma



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2677687&forum_id=2#26352238)