Anyone non-STEM bros ever try to read a medical article?
| sienna dysfunction | 10/16/14 | | Racy foreskin | 10/16/14 | | cocky corner factory reset button | 10/16/14 | | Obsidian hospital | 10/16/14 | | cocky corner factory reset button | 10/16/14 | | sienna dysfunction | 10/16/14 | | yellow affirmative action | 10/16/14 | | cocky corner factory reset button | 10/16/14 | | sienna dysfunction | 10/16/14 | | marvelous field | 10/16/14 | | sienna dysfunction | 10/16/14 | | ebony hairy legs | 10/16/14 | | sienna dysfunction | 10/16/14 | | Saffron appetizing office | 10/16/14 |
Poast new message in this thread
|
Date: October 16th, 2014 4:29 PM Author: cocky corner factory reset button
because quite a few of them have been retracted because they were factually incorrect.
you seem to be confusing adherence to science journal publishing format with some kind of superhuman erudition or cognitive ability. that's wrong; it's a formula.
phrasing things in the manner of a medical journal article is no assurance that the claims being made are any good. often, they are not.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2701606&forum_id=2#26529160) |
|
|