The New York Times vehemently defends the study of philosophy
| Soul-stirring primrose whorehouse gay wizard | 10/21/14 | | carnelian box office newt | 10/21/14 | | Excitant big-titted liquid oxygen rigor | 10/21/14 | | Soul-stirring primrose whorehouse gay wizard | 10/22/14 | | glittery fortuitous meteor stag film | 10/21/14 | | opaque halford spot | 10/21/14 |
Poast new message in this thread
|
Date: October 21st, 2014 10:47 AM Author: carnelian box office newt
"Rawls suggests imagining that we all gather to agree on a social contract, but from an “original position” so that we don’t know if we will be rich or poor, smart or dumb, diligent or lazy, American or Bangladeshi. If we don’t know whether we’ll be born in a wealthy suburban family or to a single mom in an inner city, we’ll be more inclined to favor measures that protect those at the bottom.
Or, in the context of today’s news, we may be less likely to deport Honduran children back to the desolate conditions from which they have fled."
We need philosophy to support insane open borders ideology. (shitlib)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2705693&forum_id=2#26558853) |
|
|