Are REVENGE PORN laws constitutional?
| navy trump supporter | 12/02/14 | | curious feces | 12/02/14 | | Geriatric senate | 12/02/14 | | navy trump supporter | 12/02/14 | | low-t stage | 12/02/14 | | curious feces | 12/02/14 | | Fragrant alcoholic kitchen milk | 12/02/14 | | navy trump supporter | 12/02/14 | | Rough-skinned Cuck Cruise Ship | 12/02/14 | | Offensive vigorous trailer park | 12/02/14 | | navy trump supporter | 12/02/14 | | iridescent irradiated french chef | 01/06/15 | | navy trump supporter | 01/06/15 | | rose cuckoldry shrine | 01/06/15 | | Big Elite Theater Pisswyrm | 01/06/15 | | Shimmering Titillating Psychic | 04/06/15 | | bright base | 11/23/17 | | Adventurous demanding dilemma | 11/23/17 | | magenta menage karate | 04/06/15 | | drab fortuitous meteor whorehouse | 04/06/15 | | excitant circlehead trust fund | 11/23/17 | | excitant circlehead trust fund | 11/23/17 | | Adventurous demanding dilemma | 11/23/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: December 2nd, 2014 12:27 PM Author: navy trump supporter
That it's a photograph in question, legally obtained and owned, should be no different than the legality of relaying a true story that happened ("my GF is a slut") or other material. In a free society, it is our right to distribute this kind of information at will, should it not cross the line to harassment or fraudulence. Ethically it sucks, but shouldn't be criminalized.
Criminalizing photography or sharing of photography is absolutely fucked. People need to know that if you let someone photograph you that those photo belong to that person. This applies in every other case so distorting the law to reflect people's dislike of revenge porn is nothing more than stupid legislation.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2744877&forum_id=2#26842028) |
|
|