Are REVENGE PORN laws constitutional?
| Provocative locale | 12/02/14 | | Glittery theater stage nowag | 12/02/14 | | big field | 12/02/14 | | Provocative locale | 12/02/14 | | fiercely-loyal school friendly grandma | 12/02/14 | | Glittery theater stage nowag | 12/02/14 | | swollen space mother | 12/02/14 | | Provocative locale | 12/02/14 | | brilliant domesticated hunting ground round eye | 12/02/14 | | twisted azn indian lodge | 12/02/14 | | Provocative locale | 12/02/14 | | sable home | 01/06/15 | | Provocative locale | 01/06/15 | | Vigorous legal warrant | 01/06/15 | | dun soul-stirring roast beef | 01/06/15 | | carnelian hell | 04/06/15 | | Salmon ceo | 11/23/17 | | Orange Skinny Woman | 11/23/17 | | irradiated drunken gas station | 04/06/15 | | Hyperventilating voyeur | 04/06/15 | | gold feces | 11/23/17 | | gold feces | 11/23/17 | | Orange Skinny Woman | 11/23/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: December 2nd, 2014 12:27 PM Author: Provocative locale
That it's a photograph in question, legally obtained and owned, should be no different than the legality of relaying a true story that happened ("my GF is a slut") or other material. In a free society, it is our right to distribute this kind of information at will, should it not cross the line to harassment or fraudulence. Ethically it sucks, but shouldn't be criminalized.
Criminalizing photography or sharing of photography is absolutely fucked. People need to know that if you let someone photograph you that those photo belong to that person. This applies in every other case so distorting the law to reflect people's dislike of revenge porn is nothing more than stupid legislation.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2744877&forum_id=2#26842028) |
|
|