\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Would Biglaw be sooo cr if no loans and LS stipend/full scholly?

...
appetizing coiffed hell
  01/21/15
no
Electric Tank
  01/21/15
Yeah, do 3 years in biglaw and save 300K. Then move on, you...
Razzle-dazzle new version
  01/21/15
lower v100 firms were literally doing this for ee/cs bros wh...
Rusted Infuriating Half-breed
  01/21/15
There was some crazy high demand for ee/cs for a while. Tap...
Razzle-dazzle new version
  01/21/15
No. Fatal biglaw flaws are: 1) big lawyers aren't trained a...
green travel guidebook
  01/21/15
TITCR. In addition, biglaw is a pure example of "shi...
Disturbing Exhilarant Gas Station Elastic Band
  01/21/15
...
appetizing coiffed hell
  01/21/15
No because you'd quit in less than a year. The only thing t...
spectacular sadistic school
  01/21/15
...
Olive candlestick maker
  01/21/15
Only because you could immediately quit
marvelous smoky whorehouse laser beams
  01/21/15
Potentially. If you had a full scholarship to a good school ...
Vigorous Church Building
  01/21/15


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: January 21st, 2015 9:55 AM
Author: appetizing coiffed hell



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2787934&forum_id=2#27157319)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 21st, 2015 9:56 AM
Author: Electric Tank

no

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2787934&forum_id=2#27157325)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 21st, 2015 9:58 AM
Author: Razzle-dazzle new version

Yeah, do 3 years in biglaw and save 300K. Then move on, your time is done.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2787934&forum_id=2#27157328)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 21st, 2015 10:01 AM
Author: Rusted Infuriating Half-breed

lower v100 firms were literally doing this for ee/cs bros who were ip lit paralegals. sending them to literal TTTTs

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2787934&forum_id=2#27157334)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 21st, 2015 10:02 AM
Author: Razzle-dazzle new version

There was some crazy high demand for ee/cs for a while. Tapered off a little now.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2787934&forum_id=2#27157336)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 21st, 2015 10:14 AM
Author: green travel guidebook

No. Fatal biglaw flaws are: 1) big lawyers aren't trained as managers and don't view their new hires as long term investments, so actually learning the technical fine points of practicing law (as opposed to billing for stuff like doc review or plowing diligence) in biglaw requires a lot of luck, 2) insane business model of essentially shareholder direct management that relied on now-eroded professional mores and dignity to sustain itself, and 3) the value of legal work, by its nature, is hard to quantify and measure, which makes it harder to justify premium prices in the current business climate when clients require more specific proof of the value that corresponds to the premium you attach.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2787934&forum_id=2#27157379)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 21st, 2015 10:47 AM
Author: Disturbing Exhilarant Gas Station Elastic Band

TITCR.

In addition, biglaw is a pure example of "shit only rolls downhill"-- every biglaw bro has had the experience of a partner setting a tight deadline, working over the weekend to get it done, and then getting a call/email from the partner a week or so later that is some variant of, "Did you ever do <x>?" or "I know you sent <x>, but I never had a chance to review it and can't find it... can you resend?" Then turning his comments on the next version of x have a tight deadline, and the associate may even get criticism for "not following up." Indignities like this are tolerable occasionally, but in biglaw it's constant.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2787934&forum_id=2#27157446)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 21st, 2015 2:59 PM
Author: appetizing coiffed hell



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2787934&forum_id=2#27158887)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 21st, 2015 10:24 AM
Author: spectacular sadistic school

No because you'd quit in less than a year. The only thing that keeps the vast majority of associates from getting up from their desks and walking out is the massive debt shackle they wear.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2787934&forum_id=2#27157397)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 21st, 2015 12:25 PM
Author: Olive candlestick maker



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2787934&forum_id=2#27157859)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 21st, 2015 10:30 AM
Author: marvelous smoky whorehouse laser beams

Only because you could immediately quit

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2787934&forum_id=2#27157409)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 21st, 2015 4:18 PM
Author: Vigorous Church Building

Potentially. If you had a full scholarship to a good school and did well, you could probably clerk for two years, then work at a firm for three years, then become an AUSA. This works best if you grew up in or around a secondary market and got your clerkships and firm job there. That said, I understand some people wouldn't consider the leading firms in secondary markets to be "biglaw."

I think the IP example above is a decent option too, if you're okay with doing patent prosecution and related work for a living. You would again be setting yourself to leave the firm in a few years, but in this case to go in house or to one of the many IP pros boutiques.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2787934&forum_id=2#27159346)