\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Would Biglaw be sooo cr if no loans and LS stipend/full scholly?

...
tripping supple indian lodge preventive strike
  01/21/15
no
peach fighting mother
  01/21/15
Yeah, do 3 years in biglaw and save 300K. Then move on, you...
topaz public bath sweet tailpipe
  01/21/15
lower v100 firms were literally doing this for ee/cs bros wh...
bull headed stage
  01/21/15
There was some crazy high demand for ee/cs for a while. Tap...
topaz public bath sweet tailpipe
  01/21/15
No. Fatal biglaw flaws are: 1) big lawyers aren't trained a...
histrionic mad-dog skullcap hospital
  01/21/15
TITCR. In addition, biglaw is a pure example of "shi...
flatulent crackhouse puppy
  01/21/15
...
tripping supple indian lodge preventive strike
  01/21/15
No because you'd quit in less than a year. The only thing t...
Nofapping Slap-happy Parlor Indirect Expression
  01/21/15
...
rough-skinned insane persian
  01/21/15
Only because you could immediately quit
buck-toothed mauve boistinker
  01/21/15
Potentially. If you had a full scholarship to a good school ...
startled pit
  01/21/15


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: January 21st, 2015 9:55 AM
Author: tripping supple indian lodge preventive strike



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2787934&forum_id=2#27157319)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 21st, 2015 9:56 AM
Author: peach fighting mother

no

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2787934&forum_id=2#27157325)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 21st, 2015 9:58 AM
Author: topaz public bath sweet tailpipe

Yeah, do 3 years in biglaw and save 300K. Then move on, your time is done.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2787934&forum_id=2#27157328)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 21st, 2015 10:01 AM
Author: bull headed stage

lower v100 firms were literally doing this for ee/cs bros who were ip lit paralegals. sending them to literal TTTTs

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2787934&forum_id=2#27157334)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 21st, 2015 10:02 AM
Author: topaz public bath sweet tailpipe

There was some crazy high demand for ee/cs for a while. Tapered off a little now.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2787934&forum_id=2#27157336)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 21st, 2015 10:14 AM
Author: histrionic mad-dog skullcap hospital

No. Fatal biglaw flaws are: 1) big lawyers aren't trained as managers and don't view their new hires as long term investments, so actually learning the technical fine points of practicing law (as opposed to billing for stuff like doc review or plowing diligence) in biglaw requires a lot of luck, 2) insane business model of essentially shareholder direct management that relied on now-eroded professional mores and dignity to sustain itself, and 3) the value of legal work, by its nature, is hard to quantify and measure, which makes it harder to justify premium prices in the current business climate when clients require more specific proof of the value that corresponds to the premium you attach.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2787934&forum_id=2#27157379)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 21st, 2015 10:47 AM
Author: flatulent crackhouse puppy

TITCR.

In addition, biglaw is a pure example of "shit only rolls downhill"-- every biglaw bro has had the experience of a partner setting a tight deadline, working over the weekend to get it done, and then getting a call/email from the partner a week or so later that is some variant of, "Did you ever do <x>?" or "I know you sent <x>, but I never had a chance to review it and can't find it... can you resend?" Then turning his comments on the next version of x have a tight deadline, and the associate may even get criticism for "not following up." Indignities like this are tolerable occasionally, but in biglaw it's constant.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2787934&forum_id=2#27157446)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 21st, 2015 2:59 PM
Author: tripping supple indian lodge preventive strike



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2787934&forum_id=2#27158887)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 21st, 2015 10:24 AM
Author: Nofapping Slap-happy Parlor Indirect Expression

No because you'd quit in less than a year. The only thing that keeps the vast majority of associates from getting up from their desks and walking out is the massive debt shackle they wear.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2787934&forum_id=2#27157397)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 21st, 2015 12:25 PM
Author: rough-skinned insane persian



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2787934&forum_id=2#27157859)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 21st, 2015 10:30 AM
Author: buck-toothed mauve boistinker

Only because you could immediately quit

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2787934&forum_id=2#27157409)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 21st, 2015 4:18 PM
Author: startled pit

Potentially. If you had a full scholarship to a good school and did well, you could probably clerk for two years, then work at a firm for three years, then become an AUSA. This works best if you grew up in or around a secondary market and got your clerkships and firm job there. That said, I understand some people wouldn't consider the leading firms in secondary markets to be "biglaw."

I think the IP example above is a decent option too, if you're okay with doing patent prosecution and related work for a living. You would again be setting yourself to leave the firm in a few years, but in this case to go in house or to one of the many IP pros boutiques.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2787934&forum_id=2#27159346)