\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Justice Scalia calls "flame" on Restatements.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015...
Vigorous confused brunch place of business
  02/25/15
170
Nubile gaped gas station karate
  02/25/15
ALI is done here.
wild pozpig
  02/25/15
Scalia hates common law, news at 11
House-broken Dragon
  02/25/15
I don't think that's accurate.
Vigorous confused brunch place of business
  02/25/15
he wants statutes written by the rich and for the benefit of...
House-broken Dragon
  02/25/15
...
fiercely-loyal laser beams
  02/25/15
Get this lazy cultural tribalism out of here.
Vigorous confused brunch place of business
  02/25/15
sorry about your tiny pink inability to suss out the transpa...
House-broken Dragon
  02/25/15
...
aromatic coiffed dilemma
  11/21/15
and he'll play up the fox news "everyman" bullshit...
aromatic coiffed dilemma
  11/21/15
ty
House-broken Dragon
  05/28/16
It's literally the opposite.
red multi-colored resort
  02/25/15
...
Smoky state
  02/25/15
...
self-absorbed casino love of her life
  02/25/15
Cr The quality of legal education has plummeted due to re...
nofapping boltzmann pit
  11/21/15
...
razzmatazz tattoo market
  11/21/15
...
Mischievous Public Bath
  11/21/15
you are retarded, as is and everyone who bumped this
House-broken Dragon
  05/28/16
...
red multi-colored resort
  05/07/21
(Does not read too good)
Aphrodisiac Crotch Half-breed
  02/26/15
...
Obsidian box office faggot firefighter
  11/21/15
180
180 death wish
  02/25/15
The next time you drop that cite in your brief, I want you t...
Vigorous confused brunch place of business
  02/25/15
LJL @ trial courts paying attention to what this blowhard sa...
House-broken Dragon
  02/25/15
Isn't their an obvious fallacy in this? Clearly the restatem...
fiercely-loyal laser beams
  02/25/15
No.
buck-toothed high-end old irish cottage useless brakes
  02/25/15
...
fiercely-loyal laser beams
  02/25/15
but even if that is the case, the 'more weight' derives from...
Nubile gaped gas station karate
  02/25/15
Point retracted, you guys are right.
fiercely-loyal laser beams
  02/25/15
holy shit, never seen this on xo
blue mewling stead headpube
  02/25/15
Haha I try to own reading comp screwups
fiercely-loyal laser beams
  02/25/15
(faggot)
exhilarant parlour
  02/25/15
I'mmmm white [collapses]
fiercely-loyal laser beams
  02/26/15
...
Soul-stirring international law enforcement agency
  02/25/15
Do people really drop cites to this stuff in their briefs? T...
Green Mental Disorder Prole
  02/25/15
You would probably read them if you were a shitigator.
wild pozpig
  02/25/15
You must be corporate. Restatements are frequently cited.
Vigorous confused brunch place of business
  02/25/15
in contract and torts defense cases--all the time. partner ...
Nubile gaped gas station karate
  02/25/15
Unless you use it to find persuasive case this sounds like a...
Green Mental Disorder Prole
  02/25/15
Jurisdictions adopt Restatement sections all the time. If i...
wild pozpig
  02/25/15
Yes. "to the extent there is no statutory authority ...
Vigorous confused brunch place of business
  02/25/15
Ty looked into this a little also and see what you mean.
Green Mental Disorder Prole
  02/25/15
You must not be biglaw, otherwise this would read: I do l...
Motley locale
  02/26/15
well, in the quote cited above, he said the other justices d...
Motley locale
  11/21/15
Do you know what a straw man is? How is this a straw man?
Mischievous Public Bath
  11/21/15
Can you imagine having enough time on your hands to write ab...
amber field bbw
  02/25/15
titcq
costumed yarmulke
  02/25/15
...
mentally impaired nighttime school sound barrier
  11/21/15
looks like Thomas made the same point in one sentence.
plum hospital
  02/25/15
*Thomas's clerk
House-broken Dragon
  02/25/15
He uses a bit more than that: "This Court, however, ...
Vigorous confused brunch place of business
  02/25/15
Kind of LOLing at both thomas and Scalia citing to law revie...
clear bipolar piazza cuckold
  02/25/15
"Loyola (LA) L. Rev." is that bluebook conventi...
180 death wish
  02/25/15
(moron)
exhilarant parlour
  02/25/15
...
red multi-colored resort
  02/25/15
I read this as said "calls flame on restaurants."
Bat Shit Crazy Pink Forum Mexican
  02/25/15
That ain't happening
fiercely-loyal laser beams
  02/25/15
...
House-broken Dragon
  02/25/15
...
bateful walnut hell
  02/26/15
...
Obsidian box office faggot firefighter
  11/21/15
180 moniker
flesh overrated site
  02/25/15
Same
Abnormal sepia range ape
  02/26/15
tcr
Concupiscible ebony meetinghouse
  01/26/16
(Shitlaw steve bringing § 90 action against ALI b/c he ...
Glassy ceo ticket booth
  02/25/15
...
Vigorous confused brunch place of business
  01/26/16
"flame"
Curious Naked Stain Dysfunction
  02/26/15
...
wild pozpig
  11/21/15
"I’m a damn good poker player." -Scalia
Rebellious stag film
  11/21/15
Progressive libs run the restatement racket
Arousing sanctuary mother
  11/21/15
*invents new form of tort so that a class of corporations th...
Maize Marvelous House Doctorate
  11/21/15
...
wild pozpig
  11/21/15
...
Mischievous Public Bath
  11/21/15
Actually a modest statement from Scalia re weight of authori...
Frum Weed Whacker
  11/21/15
(it is 1989)
swashbuckling theatre coffee pot
  11/21/15
...
wild pozpig
  01/26/16


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:16 PM
Author: Vigorous confused brunch place of business

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/02/25/scalia-questions-the-value-of-modern-restatements/

I write separately to note that modern Restatements — such as the Restatement (Third) of Restitution and Unjust Enrichment (2010), which both opinions address in their discussions of the disgorgement remedy — are of questionable value, and must be used with caution. The object of the original Restatements was “to present an orderly statement of the general common law.” Restatement of Conflict of Laws, Introduction, p. viii (1934). Over time, the Restatements’ authors have abandoned the mission of describing the law, and have chosen instead to set forth their aspirations for what the law ought to be. Keyes, The Restatement (Second): Its Misleading Quality and a Proposal for Its Amelioration, 13 Pepp. L. Rev. 23, 24–25 (1985). Section 39 of the Third Restatement of Restitution and Unjust Enrichment is illustrative; as JUSTICE THOMAS notes, post, at 8 (opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part), it constitutes a “‘novel extension’” of the law that finds little if any support in case law. Restatement sections such as that should be given no weight whatever as to the current state of the law, and no more weight regarding what the law ought to be than the recommendations of any respected lawyer or scholar. And it cannot safely be assumed, without further inquiry, that a Restatement provision describes rather than revises current law.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390464)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:17 PM
Author: Nubile gaped gas station karate

170

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390473)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:17 PM
Author: wild pozpig

ALI is done here.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390472)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:17 PM
Author: House-broken Dragon

Scalia hates common law, news at 11

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390474)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:18 PM
Author: Vigorous confused brunch place of business

I don't think that's accurate.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390484)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:20 PM
Author: House-broken Dragon

he wants statutes written by the rich and for the benefit of the rich to be the only recognized authority

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390494)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:22 PM
Author: fiercely-loyal laser beams



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390505)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:23 PM
Author: Vigorous confused brunch place of business

Get this lazy cultural tribalism out of here.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390513)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:30 PM
Author: House-broken Dragon

sorry about your tiny pink inability to suss out the transparent motivations behind this charlatan's fraudlies

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390568)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2015 6:21 PM
Author: aromatic coiffed dilemma



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#29226799)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2015 6:21 PM
Author: aromatic coiffed dilemma

and he'll play up the fox news "everyman" bullshit while he does it.

Well done quote quote quote quote quote guy.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#29226795)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 28th, 2016 10:57 PM
Author: House-broken Dragon

ty

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#30579689)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 6:30 PM
Author: red multi-colored resort

It's literally the opposite.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390884)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 9:52 PM
Author: Smoky state



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27392384)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 10:51 PM
Author: self-absorbed casino love of her life



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27392739)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2015 3:28 PM
Author: nofapping boltzmann pit

Cr

The quality of legal education has plummeted due to red diaper babies crawling through the institutions. The Restatements are just one casualty.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#29225899)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2015 3:37 PM
Author: razzmatazz tattoo market



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#29225946)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2015 5:22 PM
Author: Mischievous Public Bath



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#29226451)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 28th, 2016 10:58 PM
Author: House-broken Dragon

you are retarded, as is and everyone who bumped this

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#30579694)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 7th, 2021 4:17 PM
Author: red multi-colored resort



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#42420619)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 26th, 2015 8:24 AM
Author: Aphrodisiac Crotch Half-breed

(Does not read too good)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27394182)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2015 2:42 PM
Author: Obsidian box office faggot firefighter



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#29225685)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:18 PM
Author: 180 death wish

180

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390483)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:20 PM
Author: Vigorous confused brunch place of business

The next time you drop that cite in your brief, I want you to mutter thanks to the pumanimals.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390496)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 9:50 PM
Author: House-broken Dragon

LJL @ trial courts paying attention to what this blowhard says.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27392368)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:20 PM
Author: fiercely-loyal laser beams

Isn't their an obvious fallacy in this? Clearly the restatement should have more weight than the work of one "scholar" because (in theory) at least two "scholar[s]" had to agree on something for it to be included in the restatement.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390498)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:22 PM
Author: buck-toothed high-end old irish cottage useless brakes

No.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390508)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:24 PM
Author: fiercely-loyal laser beams



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390525)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:23 PM
Author: Nubile gaped gas station karate

but even if that is the case, the 'more weight' derives from a greater consensus of what the law should be, which is persuasive authority--not, as scalia notes, because it is greater evidence of what the law is

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390519)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:25 PM
Author: fiercely-loyal laser beams

Point retracted, you guys are right.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390530)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 7:13 PM
Author: blue mewling stead headpube

holy shit, never seen this on xo

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27391189)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 7:37 PM
Author: fiercely-loyal laser beams

Haha I try to own reading comp screwups

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27391425)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 11:39 PM
Author: exhilarant parlour

(faggot)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27393071)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 26th, 2015 3:10 PM
Author: fiercely-loyal laser beams

I'mmmm white [collapses]

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27395646)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 10:30 PM
Author: Soul-stirring international law enforcement agency



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27392613)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:27 PM
Author: Green Mental Disorder Prole

Do people really drop cites to this stuff in their briefs? This seems like a straw man so he can rant.

I haven't seen a restatement reference since ls and I thought they were just used then to kind of briefly overview points like in a CLE review

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390543)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:28 PM
Author: wild pozpig

You would probably read them if you were a shitigator.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390550)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:30 PM
Author: Vigorous confused brunch place of business

You must be corporate.

Restatements are frequently cited.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390570)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:31 PM
Author: Nubile gaped gas station karate

in contract and torts defense cases--all the time. partner says: shit there must be a case in which the exact same highly unlikely fact pattern occured and where the procedural posture was such that a court could decide the issue exactly in our favor? I do legal research for 20 hours, cut my time in half, then cite the restatement when i cant find said case.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390576)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:39 PM
Author: Green Mental Disorder Prole

Unless you use it to find persuasive case this sounds like a waste of time. Are there really judges that feel moved by this kind of research?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390616)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:51 PM
Author: wild pozpig

Jurisdictions adopt Restatement sections all the time. If it sounds as good as the other side's argument, why not get in line with other jurisdictions?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390695)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 6:00 PM
Author: Vigorous confused brunch place of business

Yes.

"to the extent there is no statutory authority or case law to the contrary, we adopt the national common law norms found in the RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF PROPERTY: DONATIVE TRANSFERS (1986) (hereinafter "RESTATEMENT")." Edwards v. Urice, 2004 OK CIV APP 86, ¶ 12, 99 P.3d 256, 259.

"The rules of the common law, as expressed in the restatements of the law approved by the American Law Institute, and to the extent not so expressed, as generally understood and applied in the United States, shall be the rules of decision in the courts of the Virgin Islands in cases to which they apply, in the absence of local laws to the contrary." 1 Virgin Islands Code § 4.

"We have heretofore stated that we will follow the principles set forth in the American Law Institute's Restatement of the Law except in cases where a different rule has been laid down by this Court." Odekirk v. Austin, 90 Ariz. 97, 100, 366 P.2d 80, 81 (1961).

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390723)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 6:29 PM
Author: Green Mental Disorder Prole

Ty looked into this a little also and see what you mean.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390875)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 26th, 2015 8:33 AM
Author: Motley locale

You must not be biglaw, otherwise this would read:

I do legal research for 10 hours, double my time, then cite the restatement when i cant find said case.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27394199)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2015 3:36 PM
Author: Motley locale

well, in the quote cited above, he said the other justices discussed it in their opinions, so I think he's responding to the other justices relying on the restatement

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#29225937)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2015 5:23 PM
Author: Mischievous Public Bath

Do you know what a straw man is? How is this a straw man?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#29226454)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:27 PM
Author: amber field bbw

Can you imagine having enough time on your hands to write about this shit let alone give a fuck about it?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390544)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 7:03 PM
Author: costumed yarmulke

titcq

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27391113)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2015 2:49 PM
Author: mentally impaired nighttime school sound barrier



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#29225716)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:49 PM
Author: plum hospital

looks like Thomas made the same point in one sentence.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390682)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:58 PM
Author: House-broken Dragon

*Thomas's clerk

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390716)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 6:07 PM
Author: Vigorous confused brunch place of business

He uses a bit more than that:

"This Court, however, has never before relied on §39 nor adopted its proposed theory of disgorgement. And for good reason: It lacks support in the law. One reviewer of §39 has described it as a “novel extension” of restitution principles that “will alter the doctrinal landscape of contract law.” Roberts, Restitutionary Disgorgement for Opportunistic Breach of Contract and Mitigation of Damages, 42 Loyola (LA) L. Rev. 131, 134 (2008). And few courts have ever relied on §39."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390760)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 10:29 PM
Author: clear bipolar piazza cuckold

Kind of LOLing at both thomas and Scalia citing to law review articles to shit on restatements

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27392597)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 10:42 PM
Author: 180 death wish

"Loyola (LA) L. Rev."

is that bluebook convention, or just pointing out that it's a random ttt branch of jesus?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27392691)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 11:40 PM
Author: exhilarant parlour

(moron)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27393075)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 6:30 PM
Author: red multi-colored resort



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390888)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 6:32 PM
Author: Bat Shit Crazy Pink Forum Mexican

I read this as said "calls flame on restaurants."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390900)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 7:00 PM
Author: fiercely-loyal laser beams

That ain't happening

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27391100)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 10:23 PM
Author: House-broken Dragon



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27392570)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 26th, 2015 7:04 AM
Author: bateful walnut hell



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27394096)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2015 2:43 PM
Author: Obsidian box office faggot firefighter



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#29225694)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 10:26 PM
Author: flesh overrated site

180 moniker

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27392583)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 26th, 2015 7:12 AM
Author: Abnormal sepia range ape

Same

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27394112)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 26th, 2016 5:53 PM
Author: Concupiscible ebony meetinghouse

tcr

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#29685853)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 11:27 PM
Author: Glassy ceo ticket booth

(Shitlaw steve bringing § 90 action against ALI b/c he relied on Restatements in his brief)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27392987)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 26th, 2016 5:52 PM
Author: Vigorous confused brunch place of business



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#29685842)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 26th, 2015 8:53 AM
Author: Curious Naked Stain Dysfunction

"flame"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27394223)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2015 2:40 PM
Author: wild pozpig



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#29225665)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2015 2:43 PM
Author: Rebellious stag film

"I’m a damn good poker player."

-Scalia

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#29225693)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2015 2:45 PM
Author: Arousing sanctuary mother

Progressive libs run the restatement racket

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#29225699)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2015 2:57 PM
Author: Maize Marvelous House Doctorate

*invents new form of tort so that a class of corporations that I don't like can be sued*

*gets shitlib professor buddies to write articles praising my new restatement section*

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#29225743)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2015 3:12 PM
Author: wild pozpig



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#29225831)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2015 5:24 PM
Author: Mischievous Public Bath



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#29226458)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2015 3:48 PM
Author: Frum Weed Whacker

Actually a modest statement from Scalia re weight of authority. The RSTs aren't law if it's some fart-sniffing professor in a "now let's imagine..." exercise.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#29226009)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2015 4:04 PM
Author: swashbuckling theatre coffee pot

(it is 1989)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#29226097)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 26th, 2016 4:14 PM
Author: wild pozpig



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#29685150)