\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Justice Scalia calls "flame" on Restatements.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015...
navy library blood rage
  02/25/15
170
Aquamarine personal credit line mental disorder
  02/25/15
ALI is done here.
Haunting coffee pot
  02/25/15
Scalia hates common law, news at 11
fragrant puppy
  02/25/15
I don't think that's accurate.
navy library blood rage
  02/25/15
he wants statutes written by the rich and for the benefit of...
fragrant puppy
  02/25/15
...
Curious sound barrier hissy fit
  02/25/15
Get this lazy cultural tribalism out of here.
navy library blood rage
  02/25/15
sorry about your tiny pink inability to suss out the transpa...
fragrant puppy
  02/25/15
...
Hateful Hunting Ground
  11/21/15
and he'll play up the fox news "everyman" bullshit...
Hateful Hunting Ground
  11/21/15
ty
fragrant puppy
  05/28/16
It's literally the opposite.
rose useless brakes
  02/25/15
...
abusive hell
  02/25/15
...
Deep whorehouse boiling water
  02/25/15
Cr The quality of legal education has plummeted due to re...
Startled trip stage
  11/21/15
...
Ruddy domesticated background story
  11/21/15
...
Impertinent meetinghouse gaping
  11/21/15
you are retarded, as is and everyone who bumped this
fragrant puppy
  05/28/16
...
rose useless brakes
  05/07/21
(Does not read too good)
Orchid Internet-worthy Office Sneaky Criminal
  02/26/15
...
sapphire kitchen codepig
  11/21/15
180
rebellious chest-beating casino
  02/25/15
The next time you drop that cite in your brief, I want you t...
navy library blood rage
  02/25/15
LJL @ trial courts paying attention to what this blowhard sa...
fragrant puppy
  02/25/15
Isn't their an obvious fallacy in this? Clearly the restatem...
Curious sound barrier hissy fit
  02/25/15
No.
cheese-eating striped hyena business firm
  02/25/15
...
Curious sound barrier hissy fit
  02/25/15
but even if that is the case, the 'more weight' derives from...
Aquamarine personal credit line mental disorder
  02/25/15
Point retracted, you guys are right.
Curious sound barrier hissy fit
  02/25/15
holy shit, never seen this on xo
Cerise thriller site half-breed
  02/25/15
Haha I try to own reading comp screwups
Curious sound barrier hissy fit
  02/25/15
(faggot)
Flirting Incel
  02/25/15
I'mmmm white [collapses]
Curious sound barrier hissy fit
  02/26/15
...
White dog poop
  02/25/15
Do people really drop cites to this stuff in their briefs? T...
Jet Fighting Abode Alpha
  02/25/15
You would probably read them if you were a shitigator.
Haunting coffee pot
  02/25/15
You must be corporate. Restatements are frequently cited.
navy library blood rage
  02/25/15
in contract and torts defense cases--all the time. partner ...
Aquamarine personal credit line mental disorder
  02/25/15
Unless you use it to find persuasive case this sounds like a...
Jet Fighting Abode Alpha
  02/25/15
Jurisdictions adopt Restatement sections all the time. If i...
Haunting coffee pot
  02/25/15
Yes. "to the extent there is no statutory authority ...
navy library blood rage
  02/25/15
Ty looked into this a little also and see what you mean.
Jet Fighting Abode Alpha
  02/25/15
You must not be biglaw, otherwise this would read: I do l...
Alcoholic Elite Parlor
  02/26/15
well, in the quote cited above, he said the other justices d...
Alcoholic Elite Parlor
  11/21/15
Do you know what a straw man is? How is this a straw man?
Impertinent meetinghouse gaping
  11/21/15
Can you imagine having enough time on your hands to write ab...
electric theater stage
  02/25/15
titcq
Apoplectic marvelous filthpig
  02/25/15
...
sepia school
  11/21/15
looks like Thomas made the same point in one sentence.
snowy stain resort
  02/25/15
*Thomas's clerk
fragrant puppy
  02/25/15
He uses a bit more than that: "This Court, however, ...
navy library blood rage
  02/25/15
Kind of LOLing at both thomas and Scalia citing to law revie...
insecure zombie-like range fanboi
  02/25/15
"Loyola (LA) L. Rev." is that bluebook conventi...
rebellious chest-beating casino
  02/25/15
(moron)
Flirting Incel
  02/25/15
...
rose useless brakes
  02/25/15
I read this as said "calls flame on restaurants."
Laughsome Friendly Grandma
  02/25/15
That ain't happening
Curious sound barrier hissy fit
  02/25/15
...
fragrant puppy
  02/25/15
...
magenta sweet tailpipe
  02/26/15
...
sapphire kitchen codepig
  11/21/15
180 moniker
Amber Excitant Home
  02/25/15
Same
Razzle main people base
  02/26/15
tcr
shimmering liquid oxygen goyim
  01/26/16
(Shitlaw steve bringing § 90 action against ALI b/c he ...
carnelian state
  02/25/15
...
navy library blood rage
  01/26/16
"flame"
glittery painfully honest elastic band
  02/26/15
...
Haunting coffee pot
  11/21/15
"I’m a damn good poker player." -Scalia
Mint lay
  11/21/15
Progressive libs run the restatement racket
Racy party of the first part crackhouse
  11/21/15
*invents new form of tort so that a class of corporations th...
Spectacular medicated tattoo national
  11/21/15
...
Haunting coffee pot
  11/21/15
...
Impertinent meetinghouse gaping
  11/21/15
Actually a modest statement from Scalia re weight of authori...
Boyish Shivering Dilemma Pocket Flask
  11/21/15
(it is 1989)
Demanding Blathering Theater
  11/21/15
...
Haunting coffee pot
  01/26/16


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:16 PM
Author: navy library blood rage

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/02/25/scalia-questions-the-value-of-modern-restatements/

I write separately to note that modern Restatements — such as the Restatement (Third) of Restitution and Unjust Enrichment (2010), which both opinions address in their discussions of the disgorgement remedy — are of questionable value, and must be used with caution. The object of the original Restatements was “to present an orderly statement of the general common law.” Restatement of Conflict of Laws, Introduction, p. viii (1934). Over time, the Restatements’ authors have abandoned the mission of describing the law, and have chosen instead to set forth their aspirations for what the law ought to be. Keyes, The Restatement (Second): Its Misleading Quality and a Proposal for Its Amelioration, 13 Pepp. L. Rev. 23, 24–25 (1985). Section 39 of the Third Restatement of Restitution and Unjust Enrichment is illustrative; as JUSTICE THOMAS notes, post, at 8 (opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part), it constitutes a “‘novel extension’” of the law that finds little if any support in case law. Restatement sections such as that should be given no weight whatever as to the current state of the law, and no more weight regarding what the law ought to be than the recommendations of any respected lawyer or scholar. And it cannot safely be assumed, without further inquiry, that a Restatement provision describes rather than revises current law.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390464)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:17 PM
Author: Aquamarine personal credit line mental disorder

170

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390473)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:17 PM
Author: Haunting coffee pot

ALI is done here.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390472)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:17 PM
Author: fragrant puppy

Scalia hates common law, news at 11

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390474)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:18 PM
Author: navy library blood rage

I don't think that's accurate.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390484)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:20 PM
Author: fragrant puppy

he wants statutes written by the rich and for the benefit of the rich to be the only recognized authority

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390494)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:22 PM
Author: Curious sound barrier hissy fit



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390505)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:23 PM
Author: navy library blood rage

Get this lazy cultural tribalism out of here.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390513)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:30 PM
Author: fragrant puppy

sorry about your tiny pink inability to suss out the transparent motivations behind this charlatan's fraudlies

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390568)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2015 6:21 PM
Author: Hateful Hunting Ground



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#29226799)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2015 6:21 PM
Author: Hateful Hunting Ground

and he'll play up the fox news "everyman" bullshit while he does it.

Well done quote quote quote quote quote guy.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#29226795)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 28th, 2016 10:57 PM
Author: fragrant puppy

ty

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#30579689)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 6:30 PM
Author: rose useless brakes

It's literally the opposite.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390884)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 9:52 PM
Author: abusive hell



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27392384)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 10:51 PM
Author: Deep whorehouse boiling water



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27392739)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2015 3:28 PM
Author: Startled trip stage

Cr

The quality of legal education has plummeted due to red diaper babies crawling through the institutions. The Restatements are just one casualty.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#29225899)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2015 3:37 PM
Author: Ruddy domesticated background story



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#29225946)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2015 5:22 PM
Author: Impertinent meetinghouse gaping



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#29226451)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 28th, 2016 10:58 PM
Author: fragrant puppy

you are retarded, as is and everyone who bumped this

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#30579694)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 7th, 2021 4:17 PM
Author: rose useless brakes



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#42420619)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 26th, 2015 8:24 AM
Author: Orchid Internet-worthy Office Sneaky Criminal

(Does not read too good)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27394182)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2015 2:42 PM
Author: sapphire kitchen codepig



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#29225685)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:18 PM
Author: rebellious chest-beating casino

180

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390483)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:20 PM
Author: navy library blood rage

The next time you drop that cite in your brief, I want you to mutter thanks to the pumanimals.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390496)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 9:50 PM
Author: fragrant puppy

LJL @ trial courts paying attention to what this blowhard says.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27392368)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:20 PM
Author: Curious sound barrier hissy fit

Isn't their an obvious fallacy in this? Clearly the restatement should have more weight than the work of one "scholar" because (in theory) at least two "scholar[s]" had to agree on something for it to be included in the restatement.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390498)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:22 PM
Author: cheese-eating striped hyena business firm

No.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390508)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:24 PM
Author: Curious sound barrier hissy fit



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390525)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:23 PM
Author: Aquamarine personal credit line mental disorder

but even if that is the case, the 'more weight' derives from a greater consensus of what the law should be, which is persuasive authority--not, as scalia notes, because it is greater evidence of what the law is

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390519)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:25 PM
Author: Curious sound barrier hissy fit

Point retracted, you guys are right.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390530)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 7:13 PM
Author: Cerise thriller site half-breed

holy shit, never seen this on xo

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27391189)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 7:37 PM
Author: Curious sound barrier hissy fit

Haha I try to own reading comp screwups

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27391425)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 11:39 PM
Author: Flirting Incel

(faggot)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27393071)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 26th, 2015 3:10 PM
Author: Curious sound barrier hissy fit

I'mmmm white [collapses]

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27395646)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 10:30 PM
Author: White dog poop



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27392613)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:27 PM
Author: Jet Fighting Abode Alpha

Do people really drop cites to this stuff in their briefs? This seems like a straw man so he can rant.

I haven't seen a restatement reference since ls and I thought they were just used then to kind of briefly overview points like in a CLE review

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390543)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:28 PM
Author: Haunting coffee pot

You would probably read them if you were a shitigator.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390550)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:30 PM
Author: navy library blood rage

You must be corporate.

Restatements are frequently cited.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390570)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:31 PM
Author: Aquamarine personal credit line mental disorder

in contract and torts defense cases--all the time. partner says: shit there must be a case in which the exact same highly unlikely fact pattern occured and where the procedural posture was such that a court could decide the issue exactly in our favor? I do legal research for 20 hours, cut my time in half, then cite the restatement when i cant find said case.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390576)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:39 PM
Author: Jet Fighting Abode Alpha

Unless you use it to find persuasive case this sounds like a waste of time. Are there really judges that feel moved by this kind of research?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390616)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:51 PM
Author: Haunting coffee pot

Jurisdictions adopt Restatement sections all the time. If it sounds as good as the other side's argument, why not get in line with other jurisdictions?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390695)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 6:00 PM
Author: navy library blood rage

Yes.

"to the extent there is no statutory authority or case law to the contrary, we adopt the national common law norms found in the RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF PROPERTY: DONATIVE TRANSFERS (1986) (hereinafter "RESTATEMENT")." Edwards v. Urice, 2004 OK CIV APP 86, ¶ 12, 99 P.3d 256, 259.

"The rules of the common law, as expressed in the restatements of the law approved by the American Law Institute, and to the extent not so expressed, as generally understood and applied in the United States, shall be the rules of decision in the courts of the Virgin Islands in cases to which they apply, in the absence of local laws to the contrary." 1 Virgin Islands Code § 4.

"We have heretofore stated that we will follow the principles set forth in the American Law Institute's Restatement of the Law except in cases where a different rule has been laid down by this Court." Odekirk v. Austin, 90 Ariz. 97, 100, 366 P.2d 80, 81 (1961).

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390723)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 6:29 PM
Author: Jet Fighting Abode Alpha

Ty looked into this a little also and see what you mean.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390875)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 26th, 2015 8:33 AM
Author: Alcoholic Elite Parlor

You must not be biglaw, otherwise this would read:

I do legal research for 10 hours, double my time, then cite the restatement when i cant find said case.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27394199)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2015 3:36 PM
Author: Alcoholic Elite Parlor

well, in the quote cited above, he said the other justices discussed it in their opinions, so I think he's responding to the other justices relying on the restatement

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#29225937)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2015 5:23 PM
Author: Impertinent meetinghouse gaping

Do you know what a straw man is? How is this a straw man?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#29226454)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:27 PM
Author: electric theater stage

Can you imagine having enough time on your hands to write about this shit let alone give a fuck about it?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390544)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 7:03 PM
Author: Apoplectic marvelous filthpig

titcq

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27391113)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2015 2:49 PM
Author: sepia school



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#29225716)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:49 PM
Author: snowy stain resort

looks like Thomas made the same point in one sentence.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390682)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 5:58 PM
Author: fragrant puppy

*Thomas's clerk

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390716)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 6:07 PM
Author: navy library blood rage

He uses a bit more than that:

"This Court, however, has never before relied on §39 nor adopted its proposed theory of disgorgement. And for good reason: It lacks support in the law. One reviewer of §39 has described it as a “novel extension” of restitution principles that “will alter the doctrinal landscape of contract law.” Roberts, Restitutionary Disgorgement for Opportunistic Breach of Contract and Mitigation of Damages, 42 Loyola (LA) L. Rev. 131, 134 (2008). And few courts have ever relied on §39."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390760)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 10:29 PM
Author: insecure zombie-like range fanboi

Kind of LOLing at both thomas and Scalia citing to law review articles to shit on restatements

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27392597)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 10:42 PM
Author: rebellious chest-beating casino

"Loyola (LA) L. Rev."

is that bluebook convention, or just pointing out that it's a random ttt branch of jesus?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27392691)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 11:40 PM
Author: Flirting Incel

(moron)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27393075)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 6:30 PM
Author: rose useless brakes



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390888)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 6:32 PM
Author: Laughsome Friendly Grandma

I read this as said "calls flame on restaurants."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27390900)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 7:00 PM
Author: Curious sound barrier hissy fit

That ain't happening

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27391100)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 10:23 PM
Author: fragrant puppy



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27392570)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 26th, 2015 7:04 AM
Author: magenta sweet tailpipe



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27394096)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2015 2:43 PM
Author: sapphire kitchen codepig



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#29225694)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 10:26 PM
Author: Amber Excitant Home

180 moniker

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27392583)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 26th, 2015 7:12 AM
Author: Razzle main people base

Same

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27394112)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 26th, 2016 5:53 PM
Author: shimmering liquid oxygen goyim

tcr

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#29685853)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2015 11:27 PM
Author: carnelian state

(Shitlaw steve bringing § 90 action against ALI b/c he relied on Restatements in his brief)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27392987)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 26th, 2016 5:52 PM
Author: navy library blood rage



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#29685842)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 26th, 2015 8:53 AM
Author: glittery painfully honest elastic band

"flame"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#27394223)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2015 2:40 PM
Author: Haunting coffee pot



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#29225665)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2015 2:43 PM
Author: Mint lay

"I’m a damn good poker player."

-Scalia

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#29225693)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2015 2:45 PM
Author: Racy party of the first part crackhouse

Progressive libs run the restatement racket

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#29225699)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2015 2:57 PM
Author: Spectacular medicated tattoo national

*invents new form of tort so that a class of corporations that I don't like can be sued*

*gets shitlib professor buddies to write articles praising my new restatement section*

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#29225743)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2015 3:12 PM
Author: Haunting coffee pot



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#29225831)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2015 5:24 PM
Author: Impertinent meetinghouse gaping



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#29226458)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2015 3:48 PM
Author: Boyish Shivering Dilemma Pocket Flask

Actually a modest statement from Scalia re weight of authority. The RSTs aren't law if it's some fart-sniffing professor in a "now let's imagine..." exercise.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#29226009)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2015 4:04 PM
Author: Demanding Blathering Theater

(it is 1989)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#29226097)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 26th, 2016 4:14 PM
Author: Haunting coffee pot



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2817571&forum_id=2#29685150)