The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Why are law professors fighting back against "campus rape crisis
| cyan wonderful set wagecucks | 03/04/15 |
| Red boyish halford | 03/04/15 |
| comical lavender rehab | 03/04/15 |
| Claret laser beams generalized bond | 03/04/15 |
| alcoholic navy spot | 03/04/15 |
| Supple gaping ticket booth | 04/21/15 |
| adventurous flirting institution volcanic crater | 03/04/15 |
| cyan wonderful set wagecucks | 03/04/15 |
| cyan wonderful set wagecucks | 03/04/15 |
| cyan wonderful set wagecucks | 03/04/15 |
| opaque aggressive lay | 03/04/15 |
| Thirsty legal warrant giraffe | 03/04/15 |
| crimson church nibblets | 03/04/15 |
| cyan wonderful set wagecucks | 03/04/15 |
| Vivacious cheese-eating box office | 04/21/15 |
| Aqua Soul-stirring Headpube Library | 04/21/15 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: March 4th, 2015 2:11 AM Author: cyan wonderful set wagecucks Penn law professors are now voicing criticism against the lack of due process in hearings. www.thedp.com:8080/article/2015/02/penn-law-professors-respond-to-sexual-violence-investigative-procedures
Just a few months ago, Harvard law profs demanded that the accused be given due process. http://www.npr.org/2014/10/15/356424999/harvard-law-professors-say-new-sexual-assault-policy-is-one-sided
When the duke lacrosse "rape" allegations appeared in the limelight, duke law professors were the only faculty at duke to unanimously remain silent about the situation, going so far as to be the only department to not sign the group of 88 petition https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2006/05/01/johnson
Real talk: as much as we hate LOL school and LOL professors, they seem to be the only ones doing any thinking |
 |
Date: March 4th, 2015 2:20 AM Author: Red boyish halford A group of 18 economics faculty signed a petition which stated "the Group of 88 does not speak for all Duke faculty."[14]
also, I'm pretty sure the vast majority of people who signed it came from super shitlib disciplines. there probably were at most a handful of STEM profs (<5% of the total) to sign
most people in non-shitlib disciplines just don't give a fuck. lawyers are contrarian turds who will do anything as an excuse for some sparkling SCHOLARSHIP |
Date: March 4th, 2015 6:58 AM Author: comical lavender rehab Some of these law profs are even notorious Shitlibs in other contexts. They are all heroic as fuck, and in this sociopolitical climate, their speaking out exposes them to real professional risks. I give them a lot of credit for doing the right thing. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2822089&forum_id=2#27426763) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2015 6:32 PM Author: Claret laser beams generalized bond (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2822089&forum_id=2#27429767) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2015 10:09 PM Author: alcoholic navy spot (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2822089&forum_id=2#27431129) |
|
Date: April 21st, 2015 12:11 PM Author: Supple gaping ticket booth (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2822089&forum_id=2#27729968) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2015 7:01 AM Author: adventurous flirting institution volcanic crater probably because, despite the undeniable fact that law ISN'T SCHOLARSHIP, they're well-placed to understand the actual stakes involved in a degradation of due process, as well as the normal standards of evidence in sexual assault cases in non-campus contexts. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2822089&forum_id=2#27426764) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2015 4:59 PM Author: cyan wonderful set wagecucks (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2822089&forum_id=2#27429280) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2015 6:20 PM Author: cyan wonderful set wagecucks (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2822089&forum_id=2#27429703) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2015 8:07 PM Author: cyan wonderful set wagecucks (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2822089&forum_id=2#27430307) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2015 8:09 PM Author: opaque aggressive lay give shitlib profs credit where credit is due (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2822089&forum_id=2#27430321) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2015 10:02 PM Author: Thirsty legal warrant giraffe (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2822089&forum_id=2#27431063) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2015 10:08 PM Author: crimson church nibblets (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2822089&forum_id=2#27431123) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2015 10:58 PM Author: cyan wonderful set wagecucks (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2822089&forum_id=2#27431482) |
|
Date: April 21st, 2015 12:14 PM Author: Vivacious cheese-eating box office (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2822089&forum_id=2#27730003) |
|
Date: April 21st, 2015 12:20 PM Author: Aqua Soul-stirring Headpube Library because 'preponderance of evidence' makes a mockery of teh law. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2822089&forum_id=2#27730043) |