CONS: If you oppose further financial regulation,
| Vibrant Set | 03/23/15 | | Awkward jap address | 03/23/15 | | mauve thirsty pit | 03/23/15 | | Vibrant Set | 03/23/15 | | stimulating candlestick maker tanning salon | 03/23/15 | | Vibrant Set | 03/23/15 | | trip range | 03/23/15 | | Vibrant Set | 03/23/15 | | mauve thirsty pit | 03/23/15 | | Vibrant Set | 03/23/15 | | cracking state | 03/23/15 | | mauve thirsty pit | 03/23/15 | | twinkling razzle police squad | 03/23/15 |
Poast new message in this thread
|
Date: March 23rd, 2015 10:48 AM Author: Vibrant Set
It depends on what you mean by "investors," but I would argue that the people who usually pay are depositors at banks (although FDIC should help this, but again, we shouldn't need it with the almighty "free market"), employees who own pensions, etc. My point is, all the information about which individuals, banks, etc. have perpetrated fraud in the past is available online. Just look it up and don't do business with them anymore. No reason to lock them up, it isn't a violent crime.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2836874&forum_id=2#27540241) |
|
|