CONS: If you oppose further financial regulation,
| Light fragrant depressive cuck | 03/23/15 | | adventurous dark faggot firefighter field | 03/23/15 | | irradiated prole | 03/23/15 | | Light fragrant depressive cuck | 03/23/15 | | primrose lettuce sound barrier | 03/23/15 | | Light fragrant depressive cuck | 03/23/15 | | maize spot halford | 03/23/15 | | Light fragrant depressive cuck | 03/23/15 | | irradiated prole | 03/23/15 | | Light fragrant depressive cuck | 03/23/15 | | Khaki boiling water | 03/23/15 | | irradiated prole | 03/23/15 | | puce impertinent tattoo private investor | 03/23/15 |
Poast new message in this thread
|
Date: March 23rd, 2015 10:48 AM Author: Light fragrant depressive cuck
It depends on what you mean by "investors," but I would argue that the people who usually pay are depositors at banks (although FDIC should help this, but again, we shouldn't need it with the almighty "free market"), employees who own pensions, etc. My point is, all the information about which individuals, banks, etc. have perpetrated fraud in the past is available online. Just look it up and don't do business with them anymore. No reason to lock them up, it isn't a violent crime.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2836874&forum_id=2#27540241) |
|
|