\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

CONS: If you oppose further financial regulation,

why do we need laws prohibiting embezzlement or fraud? Clear...
Light fragrant depressive cuck
  03/23/15
um, what?
adventurous dark faggot firefighter field
  03/23/15
don't play stupid shitcon
irradiated prole
  03/23/15
...
Light fragrant depressive cuck
  03/23/15
Investors aren't always the ones being defrauded/embezzled f...
primrose lettuce sound barrier
  03/23/15
It depends on what you mean by "investors," but I ...
Light fragrant depressive cuck
  03/23/15
Since when are cons against embezzlement or fraud laws? Cons...
maize spot halford
  03/23/15
I'm saying they're against financial regulation, which makes...
Light fragrant depressive cuck
  03/23/15
Why do conturds making 40k a year buy into the anti regulati...
irradiated prole
  03/23/15
Political Genius: Impose burdensome regulations on small bus...
Light fragrant depressive cuck
  03/23/15
because they are motivated by the mindset of a rugged indivi...
Khaki boiling water
  03/23/15
what about prison guards in the middle of nowhere?
irradiated prole
  03/23/15
They also buy into the American mythology.
puce impertinent tattoo private investor
  03/23/15


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: March 23rd, 2015 10:37 AM
Author: Light fragrant depressive cuck

why do we need laws prohibiting embezzlement or fraud? Clearly, if you defraud your investors, the "free market" would presumably prefer not to work with you anymore. The only way to justify the laws if is you agree that transparency and prohibitions can actually help ordinary people beyond what the market itself would do. (I understand there's the issue of state v. criminal instead of victim v. criminal, but I don't think it's really relevant. The whole reason to prosecute is to protect the public).

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2836874&forum_id=2#27540194)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 23rd, 2015 10:40 AM
Author: adventurous dark faggot firefighter field

um, what?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2836874&forum_id=2#27540205)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 23rd, 2015 10:44 AM
Author: irradiated prole

don't play stupid shitcon

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2836874&forum_id=2#27540219)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 23rd, 2015 10:47 AM
Author: Light fragrant depressive cuck



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2836874&forum_id=2#27540231)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 23rd, 2015 10:41 AM
Author: primrose lettuce sound barrier

Investors aren't always the ones being defrauded/embezzled from. Probably not even in most cases.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2836874&forum_id=2#27540211)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 23rd, 2015 10:48 AM
Author: Light fragrant depressive cuck

It depends on what you mean by "investors," but I would argue that the people who usually pay are depositors at banks (although FDIC should help this, but again, we shouldn't need it with the almighty "free market"), employees who own pensions, etc. My point is, all the information about which individuals, banks, etc. have perpetrated fraud in the past is available online. Just look it up and don't do business with them anymore. No reason to lock them up, it isn't a violent crime.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2836874&forum_id=2#27540241)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 23rd, 2015 10:51 AM
Author: maize spot halford

Since when are cons against embezzlement or fraud laws? Cons are typically against insider trading laws, which when you think about it are typically hard to justify except in the case of actual fraud/sinking ship scenarios.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2836874&forum_id=2#27540248)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 23rd, 2015 10:54 AM
Author: Light fragrant depressive cuck

I'm saying they're against financial regulation, which makes more sense to me than embezzlement or fraud laws.

I agree with you though that, yes, in the cons world the free market should contradict any ability to make "insider" trades. This is also why expanding through M&A is so difficult to do profitably.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2836874&forum_id=2#27540256)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 23rd, 2015 10:55 AM
Author: irradiated prole

Why do conturds making 40k a year buy into the anti regulation message?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2836874&forum_id=2#27540260)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 23rd, 2015 11:00 AM
Author: Light fragrant depressive cuck

Political Genius: Impose burdensome regulations on small businesses, remove regulations on big business, get pissed off little guys to vote for you to remove the regulations

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2836874&forum_id=2#27540285)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 23rd, 2015 11:12 AM
Author: Khaki boiling water

because they are motivated by the mindset of a rugged individualist; of course, if they're a farmer getting 50K of subsidies a year, they use mental gymnastics to justify their kickbacks

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2836874&forum_id=2#27540337)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 23rd, 2015 11:13 AM
Author: irradiated prole

what about prison guards in the middle of nowhere?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2836874&forum_id=2#27540340)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 23rd, 2015 11:15 AM
Author: puce impertinent tattoo private investor

They also buy into the American mythology.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2836874&forum_id=2#27540355)