The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
lol at delusional brian williams thinking he'll get his job back
Poast new message in this thread
Date: April 24th, 2015 11:44 PM Author: Outnumbered Chocolate National http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/25/business/media/nbc-inquiry-said-to-find-that-brian-williams-embellished.html (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2863183&forum_id=2#27755049) |
Date: April 24th, 2015 11:45 PM Author: hairless den telephone lol brian williams is such a TTT queer (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2863183&forum_id=2#27755057) |
 |
Date: April 25th, 2015 12:28 AM Author: duck-like talented corner mother (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2863183&forum_id=2#27755412) |
|
Date: April 25th, 2015 3:36 AM Author: trip transparent water buffalo It's weird. A lot of these bros in news grew up worshiping legit alpha newsmen. Now TV news (and really newsmen in general) are pointless. Legit subject matter experts have taken over the role that news bros used to have with blogs/articles/columns and dedicated newsmen are just worthless self aggrandizing know nothing morons. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2863183&forum_id=2#27756011) |
|
Date: April 25th, 2015 3:46 AM Author: Razzle Public Bath Round Eye can you point out legit subject matter experts? 90% of US news media useless TTT and total circle jerk. Just look at the topics they chose to cover and how they cover it (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2863183&forum_id=2#27756026) |
|
Date: April 25th, 2015 3:47 AM Author: lavender stimulating nursing home private investor rush limbaugh - MFE on shitlibbery and its consequences to the human race (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2863183&forum_id=2#27756030) |
|
Date: April 25th, 2015 3:50 AM Author: Razzle Public Bath Round Eye he is another TTT on the other side.I cant think of one single good columnist,opinion writer who is consistently good. The entire NYT/WP columnist group is utter shit (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2863183&forum_id=2#27756034) |
|
Date: April 25th, 2015 3:51 AM Author: lavender stimulating nursing home private investor ann coulter and pat buchanan are spot on (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2863183&forum_id=2#27756036) |
|
Date: April 25th, 2015 3:56 AM Author: Razzle Public Bath Round Eye you serious? i not a shitlib but they mostly write click-bait articles even if on "some" of the issues they are on the correct side (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2863183&forum_id=2#27756045) |
|
Date: April 25th, 2015 3:58 AM Author: lavender stimulating nursing home private investor ann coulter and pat buchanan's schticks have been around long before click-bait was in the english language
|
|
Date: April 25th, 2015 8:05 AM Author: anal psychic Steve Sailer, John Derbyshire (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2863183&forum_id=2#27756320) |
|
Date: April 25th, 2015 3:51 AM Author: trip transparent water buffalo For any domestic issue there's experts in academia or relevant industry who will chime in via their blogs or dedicated column. For econ there's shit like Krugman or marginal revolution or DeLong or whatever. For legal issues there's Volokh for con law shit or hls business blog or tax blogs and shit. All stuff people used to go to general news for (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2863183&forum_id=2#27756035) |
|
Date: April 25th, 2015 3:53 AM Author: lavender stimulating nursing home private investor volokh or scotusblog are barely readable to a college educated person who isnt a lawyer or poli sci shithead. you need some mainstream media coverage of this shit (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2863183&forum_id=2#27756039) |
|
Date: April 25th, 2015 3:55 AM Author: trip transparent water buffalo To me it's mainstream stuff that isn't readable (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2863183&forum_id=2#27756042) |
|
Date: April 25th, 2015 3:57 AM Author: lavender stimulating nursing home private investor i can skim a wsj article on almost anything and get the gist. if i want to know wtf is going on in crimea, i can read the latest wsj news article about that shit. i dont need some wonky russian military blog that reads like an are reptile poast. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2863183&forum_id=2#27756047) |
|
Date: April 25th, 2015 3:58 AM Author: Razzle Public Bath Round Eye WSJ is generally CR. some of the new yorker articles as long as it is not SJW type topic are OK too. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2863183&forum_id=2#27756052) |
|
Date: April 25th, 2015 4:00 AM Author: trip transparent water buffalo (not a scholar)
I fucking hate the term wonky. Don't you just mean in depth and actually accurate instead of superficial to the point of being meaningless |
|
Date: April 25th, 2015 4:04 AM Author: lavender stimulating nursing home private investor there are two types of in-depth. there is in-depth that has no "[X issue] 101" background info and is written for people with a baseline level of knowledge in the field, and there is in-depth that is for the general public in some long-ass article. i can read some 20,000 word new yorker article on the crimea conflict, yes. but no, i cant read some MFE blog about it that is filled w are reptile level acronyms and jargon. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2863183&forum_id=2#27756059) |
|
Date: April 25th, 2015 3:55 AM Author: Razzle Public Bath Round Eye volokh is CR. Krugman is liberal shithead. so basically we have volokh who is probably not accessible to most ppl in this country (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2863183&forum_id=2#27756043) |
|
Date: April 25th, 2015 3:58 AM Author: trip transparent water buffalo Lol I disagree with most of Krugmans ideas but I still find reading him to be valuable. A lot more valuable than reading some know nothing morons summary of shit that's way over his head (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2863183&forum_id=2#27756053) |
|
Date: April 25th, 2015 4:00 AM Author: Razzle Public Bath Round Eye the problem is Krugman is not open minded. If I know the topic I know what Krugman is going to say in general without even reading the article. That is never good for an opinion writer. he is like RBG in the supreme court. for 95% of cases once I read the issue summary I know which way she will vote even before oral arguments (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2863183&forum_id=2#27756057) |
|
Date: April 25th, 2015 4:05 AM Author: trip transparent water buffalo I generally know whether he'll be for something sure but it's interesting and informative reading the exact why a lot of time. Sometimes he is obtuse and it makes my blood boil but others I've reconsidered my thoughts (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2863183&forum_id=2#27756060) |
|
Date: April 25th, 2015 3:45 AM Author: Razzle Public Bath Round Eye he is done at NBC (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2863183&forum_id=2#27756025) |
|
Date: April 25th, 2015 8:01 AM Author: magical preventive strike Remember Hillary's sniper fire story?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8BfNqhV5hg4 |
|
Date: April 25th, 2015 8:50 AM Author: Flickering disrespectful school mood Dude is done here in journalism, he's damaged goods.
Enjoy your adjunct professorship at Bowdoin, Brian! |